Monday 13 November 2017

Mahir pari's assignment on Robinson Crusoe as a myth

To evaluate my assignment click here


Name  :- Goswami mahirpari

Class.   :- M.A.sem - 1
Topic.    :- Robinson Crusoe as a
            Myth
Paper no.  :- 2
Enrollment :- 2069108420180021
Number
Yer.       :- 2017 - 19
E mail  goswamimahirpari786@gmail
Submitted.  :- S.B.Garedi English         
             Department
       About writer :-
         ( . Daniel Defoe )
   
Born        Daniel Foe
             1659–1660
            London England.
Died       24 April 1731
            (aged 70–72)
            London England.
Occupati Writer
journalist,   merchant
Genre Adventure  
Origin of the myth  : -
                    An origin myth is a myth that purports to describe the origin of some feature of the natural or social world. One type of origin myth is the cosmogonic myth , which describes the creation of the world. However, many cultures have stories set after the cosmogonic myth, which describe the origin of natural phenomena and human institutions within a preexisting universe.
In Western classical scholarship , the terms
etiological myth and aition (from the Ancient Greek αἴτιον, "cause") are sometimes used for a myth that explains an origin, particularly how an object or custom came into existence.
Definition of the myth  :-
                      myth
mɪθ/
noun
1.
a traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.
"ancient Celtic myths"
    traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.  ‘ancient Celtic myths’
[mass noun] ‘the heroes of Greek myth’
      


  Robinson Crusoe as a Myth :-
                          Robinson Crusoe may be a novel in it's treat ment of the individually but in respects to its view of colonization's it  certainly idealizes  is the portra yal of the ultimate eighteenth-chentury British fantastic a human shipwrecked on an island not only survi ves but flour ishes popul ating an enti-
e colonylly  in service of God and - country If Robinson Crusoe is the Empires dream then The Mnstone is its nightmar For Defoe the perip -hery is comp lacent or co-operative It is productive Even while on the peripheral island it is Robinson not Friday  who remain's the focuses of the novel though Robinson and Friday certain sha re a questionably -lly intimated relat ionship Moonstone is interested's in boundarie and in the crossings of them both by people's or ad  by thing's It is asks about the Consequence's lly  of a peripheral push back: what if Friday's weren’t complacently? What if the colonies lly were to infiltrated te core on an existentially l evel that ran dee-
per than the funneling of raw materials's
Chapter 1 of the First Period opens with a description of what is to be found “
*** in the first part of Robinson Crusoe at the page one hund red and twenty-nine you will find it thus written ‘Now I saw, thou gh too late the Folly of beginn ing's a Work bef ore we count the Cost and before we jud -
ge righ -tly of our own Stre ngth to go thr ough with it’” ***
Is this a novel we’ve begun or a critical essay?
For Betteredge
Crusoe is much more than a novel ?   it is his san ctuary and adv-
ice guide He consults it by arbitrarily turning's the pages treating the pass ages he finds with religio references borderinged on obsession Betteredge “has worn out six stout Robinson Crusoes with hard work in his services' 
He even goes so far as to say that “such a book as Robinson Crusoe
never was writtened and never will be writtened form  again”  I think we would be remi to take this state ment as only an indica of an old humaan’s madness whetvher or not we trust Betteredge as a or narrator s an entirelyly  different question's
The danger to in the peri phery penetratingly the core is also party mythological te diamond is not only a raw materials but it is cursed is a product of the social relation surrounding's it is  the 3
Brahmins, the Sultan, the Colonel… but because the diamonds is both a product of social relation or a product's of India it is assumes mystic presenceing which haunts the novel The mythology of the diamond escal ates the st stakes of the conflict to the  not only has the periphery insinuates itself into the cor, but the core cannot even firmly articulate's if us as to the curse of the diamonds is simply “a fancifully storyline” or a threat to be taken seriouslylly
The myth of "Robinson Crusoe" is analogous to the bou urgeois myth
Crusoe's story about his twenty eight years life on an island is full of mythic charmsed There is one class of people's  whom the story  "Robinson Crusoe" can assume a timelessness value. That class is the class of bourgeois'eds people The 18 chentury bourgeois people find the perprojection of the assumpions and belief systemsed i Robinson Crusoe's life on a hitherto un inhabited island for twenty eight years
Crusoe worked's hard when he was left in the lurc h on a hith-
erto uninhabited island He believeing is to in the emanci-
patory power of hard work
Work-ethics become the motiv
ating 'sfactor in his lonely life entrapp in the wild of the island Sometimes he used to feel terribly sad's he used to stop working he used to become nervoused in that time he  In the fit of ll extreme sadness he used to interrog ate the divine will He used to contemplate 's on how the divine will operates
At the moment of serious contemplation's he used to console him preordained cause divine cause behind as in his  my entrapped Island-life in loneli-
ness and isolation It is work's or work alone that I can understand ' the mysteryed of the operation of the divine Providence  After thus kind of contemplations Robinson Crusoe used to work
This work-ethics of Crusoe strongly attrac or to  the bourgeois class people. Itlls through hardwork and -rational styles of taking ' precautiov nary measur es that Robinson Crusoe successes in taming this wild islands Behind Crusoe's successful civilizin's-
g mission lies the secret of the rational bent of mind and as a time so the continuous organiz martial powere's gun power The power of reason and the power of gun enabl Robinson Crusoe to assert dominion over all the the island Moreover find it TG hat his protestanted faith of God encouraged him to be loyal to the work-ethnics he clung strictly  These aspects of  robin Crusoe's life on the island bear timeless significance The bourgeois class  human ti and the class of
who undertake the project'd of colonialism have jointly seen the timelessness value and significants in the story of Robinson Crusoe Hence If "The Robinson Crusoe" is the mythcall and or to find it it is the myth of the basically secret of succeed One step ahead it is th-
e myth which is cent ral to th-
e bourgeois s and the s of people who tend to colonize throug-
h conquest
Myth: repetition, contradiction and ideology
The myth then  repeated those event's which are important either from a narrative or isr ideological point of views expressed by the way Indeed a very good these very often coincidence Crusoe’s “masterings of his trau ma throug -
h repetition's”  is less a matter of sychology though it is that than of textual's mythical and hen-
ce ideologically legitimtion Repeatd event include Crusoe’s urge to wandering ostensively an evil but an essentially or  un -resolved drive behind the narrative which is repeated in both large's a or  small formsed through out the story one of Crusoe’s ill-fated boat trips from the island is describes as a dangeroused “ramblings to sea”  Other rep repetitions incv lude the ‘beginn ing mome nt’ of repetitious contradicting in Crusoe’s account's of his first landings upon the island the dream which by to the anticipated the coming's of Friday disc ussed earlier and Friday’s “abandoning of the state of natur-
e for the advantagesed of civilizations”  which repeated with some important difference Crusoe’s  earlier dev develop ment which is the itself also a moveme-
nt from heathenism the is a as symbols of dangeroues individual freeform to Christianity's
Repetition thus occurs of tho-
se narratived event which form point of tension or thus where the power's of the myth as in bearer of ideologues needs to be reinforced but in the same movements the repetition's signals that some -
thing of an ideological nature pperhaps a potential threat or change to the existent social morality is seeking releas-
e Similarlytion  contradiction reveal the rupture where something of the real historically condition can be glimpsed beneath the fabric of the mythcall Both repeti tion and contradictions can be round in the famous episode where Crus-
oe comes upon a drawertion  full of gold in the shipwrecks This has been analysd by many critics  but only Zelnick notes that the finding of gold is repeatedly later and none comments upon the fact that the whole sequence of shipw reck to the findings an salvation of gold and supplies is repeated in a rema - rkably similar form later in the book when Crusoe observes a ship running onto subm erged rocks-
and his reac tion is to give tha-
nks to God that “of two ships’ companiesedv  who were now cast away upon this part's of the world not one life should be spar but mine”  He then raids this ship and finds a seaman’single chest with “fifty pieces or o is f eight in royals”: “however I lugged this money home to my cave and laid it up”
The hoading of the gold des-
pite its lack of utility is of course a contra diction the gold must initiall-
y be rejects but then admitt since Crusoe is the economic man and reveals the impurity of Crusoe’s State of Nature's At the same time it elliptica point to the major unresolvd contradicon in the text which arises from a historically emer ging desire for yet the inherent dang er of freedom from restriction's in the economically sphere embossed in the mobility and restrictions of the individual the an opposition's of passivity:action and inherent in Crusoe’s prison island run on a laissezfaire economy's
Defoe’s book is crossed by many discoursed religiously normal economics comm ercial or and colonialism These discourses intersect in multiple ways just wanted to look forward  for example commerci an moral disco urses join in Crusoe’s ‘moral bookkeeping’ although here it might be more appro priate to see comme rcial disco urse as colon and hence structuring mo-
ral thought's Here I will argue that three of these discours bearing the weight of ideas of econo-
mics individualism and colonialism respective are treat or to and have histo rically been reading in such a way as to confer a mythical status upon the novel
In all three cases mythcall funct - ions or emer ges in the text in at least three ways. Firstly, myth - serves as a myth of origin wheth-
er in a really chronological sens-
e many ‘primitive’ mythcall an legend's tell o the original of hum-
an and his envir ons, for example or in the sense which gives a priority to a particular elem ent of the book the individual manby  for exampe as an historical or social dete - rminant and hence thought of as in some way ‘prior’ to larger compounds macrocos- 
mic structured To cover bovth these senses  but espe cially the latter I will use the term ‘originary’. Second  myth env tails some sense of unre ality of fals-
ity or uto pian fantasy usu-ally detecte and measurd here against ‘real’, document historical evidenc. As ideology this may involve an ‘essentialisation’ of complexity's in some sense reduction simplifica
or notsoradical separation of the element's’ Thirdly on the level of form and pattern myth w-
orks through the narrative as ‘adventure sto and through repe “the funcion of repetitio is to render the structure of the mythcall apparet”
These three elements of myth not only allow us to detect its strucuring presence but also sign myth as the bearer of ideology and hence at its po ints of tension myth is ruptures by the contradiction that the ideology seeks to smooth over This is to  then that Robinson Crusoe work in these textua specific and sometime-
s  contra dictory or am bivalent ways to embody and prom-ote a certain ideo logy and cons-onant with this to provide a mythical configu ration wh erein such as the structure of the self and other both geographill and psycholog
can be thought.
Cannibaism is a recurrng triple throughout Robinson Crusoe  Crusoe  highl repeti -tious ‘fear of being eaten’ is a mytheme supporting the larger mythic structured Cannibalism defined the white man by negation but it also signal as a pole of the ‘outer limit’ of the man construcng a scale begning with civilised Englishumen aa or  descening through the buffer zone of the Spaniard since they speak the “savage lang-
uage”  through savage through cannibal In this construcion is that which has yet to receive in - corporate the rationale of the nineteenth century’s theories of evolution found in such canoni-
cal wors as Conrad’s Heart of Dark ml ness  there is contaed a common term to be fine in their lives  the man which is potentially the destrucion of the whole representaional system Hulme explains thu “They canniba are not regardd as inh uman because if they were aanimalls their behaviovur would be naturally and could not be not cause the outrage and fear that annibalismas always provoked
*** Generalised Conclusion  *** :-
My discussion of Robinson Crusoe has read against the grain of the book's surfface realism or has suggest that a mythic discourse is  true structur force ‘working through’ the both senses or f the hrase narrative and formal repetition the myth is all the more powerful for its
historically locations prior to economically and literary hey-
day of coloniaism in the 19chentury in in  its con contradddictions and repetition's thought we find that in a sense's  Crusoe is not ‘about’ the colonized at all Hugh Riddley claims that
“the Crusoe storierevealed how little interest lay in the newn of the world to be disovered”  and how
“the strange advent -urelead.. .back to Europe and to the European self” . Any reading of
Crusoe thus bec oms relentless about the bokk's ‘reading back’ to the Europe h is alway already its birth place about the text as part of the “ideologyll of a new' and vast ed hist orical process” Watt
Rise's   dive rgence or conve rgence or  the great preoccupaons of Enlightenment utility and the practically natural law's the State of Nature aod the ‘recent inveb ntion’ of ‘human’ in its many forms's
Robinson's Crusoe ‘ mythical represe ntations of the Other -bifurcate into contr adictor -
y doubles noble savage WS cannibalism savage geography vs. Edenic dominiontion and represe -ntations of the primal encoun -
ter as “** idealised tribute***” vs. “f***ierce hostility”*** under the weighted an expa nsive capitalists ideology which cannot ye-
  t represent those dangerous complexities which consequen escape it yet inevitably return in the text in or  Neither but can show to
For  the ideology nor mythical creature disc ourse that's is it's 'vehicle openly admit that the Other always pro duces the Self despit-
e it's narrative' which develops due -to a search for self a them which prod uces an inf on inite number's of narative's – how many book including The Life and Str-
ange Surprizing Adve oes ntures of Robinson Crusoe  beg in with “I” Myth utopia  projection exist because of the gap be tween represen-
tation and the really and more specifica
n the yearly eiightenth chentury the geographically or metaphys-
ically gap between Europe and its emerging colonies  as Other come to be economics and ideol ogical indis -pensab

Thursday 9 November 2017

Yugpurush

Yugpurush- Mahatma ka mahatma
August 4,2017
Today we was going to see the live play Mahatma ka Mahatma at Yashwant rai Natya Gruh, Bhavnagar.
Yugpurush is the play about the nation father Mahatma Gandhi's Life. This play is talk about where Gandhi inspired to doing SatyaGrah. We know what is importance of guru (teacher) in our life.

Guru is our deity. If guru wants, he/she will change our life. Guru is our destiny. We can see that Gandhi also a guru Jain philosopher Shrimad Rajchandraji. And he changed Gandhiji's life.
The Father of the Indian Nation, Mahatma Gandhi is synonymous with ahimsa and satyagraha. One wonders who the Mahatma's inspiration was. Gandhiji placed Shrimad Rajchandraji as foremost among those he considered to be his guides. Shrimadji's direct interaction with Gandhiji and His letters, both played a pivotal role in shaping Gandhiji's character and kindled in him the novel idea of using ahimsa to attain independence.
The Yugpurush is a heart-touching portrayal of this special bond between Shrimadji and Gandhiji that catapulted him from 'Mohandas' to 'Mahatma'. What began as friendship, progressed to Gandhiji's proclamation of Shrimadji as his spiritual mentor.

Post Truth

We know the definition of Post Truth very well.
According to Oxford Dictionary that
"Relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.
‘in this era of post-truth politics, it's easy to cherry-pick data and come to whatever conclusion you desire'."
It means  the truth has broken by media and another social media like facebook, twitter,whats app,Instagram etc, that the truth has saw as very Pepperded, and the conclusion has desired by whatever they want. Nd some of critic has believed that this era also a 'Post Truth Political Era'.
I would like to give some political examples like a 'Achhe din'.
We know Modiji will have been completed his 5 year as a PM. And we also know that whatever he done and doing and will be do. And we also know he has done work, which is impossible to another government. We can see that our social media network has propagated that Making a image, and also know the 'Vikas'. They make a jokes, commentary to fight with each other. Like a Congress and Bhajapa, Aam aadmi party and another parties.
I would like tell that one news conference I must that is name 'Aapki adalat' which is organised by Rajat Sharma. I seen this conference, Rajat Sharma has given some example Congress party and Bhajapa's party. Here we can see that nowadays Bhajapa Government has ruler so that Rajat Sharma and another News reporter has spoken with Bhajapa. Whenever government will change, they change.
I would like to share here Rajat sharma's These conference link.
I would like to give some more example about post truth. We are habitually watching T.V serial and  film. Here we can see that most of the directer has started old concept story like 'Mahabharat', 'Gita' and other story. Here we can see that the director has changed and make a new story & serial and they conclude as they wants.

S . T . Coleridge

Difference between prose & poem.
There are some common things between poem and prose. say for i.e, Language first of all, then pleasure, delight, catharsis and other feelings like that. All the things which can be narrated in poem, it also can be expressed well in prose writing.
Bht how and where it differs is thus -
In comparison with poem, prose have limited addition of meanings whereas poem can be meant in thousands of ways. It is the charm of poetry. There might be less words than prose but it can be interpreted in so many ways.
Now if we glimpse over on Coleridge's statement,then we can say that why prose has elements of truth & poem has pleasure.because as we see above that prose has simple structure containing particular subject matter & that only has aimed to be strict to the truth,while poem has sentimental & emotional journey of poet with full expressions & decorations that should have the aim of delight or please to others only.
2.Difference between poetry and poems:
poem;
A poem is the arrangements of words that contain meaning and musical elements. It is a piece of writing that expresses the writer’s thought and feelings in order to set a mood; it can be happy or sad simple or complex. In just a few words, a poem can say a lot, it can be happy or sad , simple or complex. A poem can either be rhyming or non-rhyming. It uses symbols and has lines and stanzas that have sentences, fragments of sentences or both. It uses metaphor and alliteration, especially in poems for children.
Both poetry and prose are generally creative in nature and are used to express emotion or to tell a story. Although poetry is more structured in terms of the format in which it is written, prose is generally more rigid in terms of grammatical correctness. Prose is typically comprised of complete sentences which convey specific thoughts or feelings. Poetry is often more abstract or vague with words being written as they come and less attention being given to proper grammatical rules.

Hamlet

William Shakespeare was an English poet and playwright who is considered one of the greatest writers to ever use the English language. He is also the most famous playwright in the world, with his plays being translated in over 50 languages and performed across the globe for audiences of all ages. His works span tragedy, comedy, and historical works, both in poetry and prose. And although the man is the most-recognized playwright in the world, very little of his life is actually known. No known autobiographical letters or diaries have survived to modern day, and with no surviving descendants, Shakespeare is a figure both of magnificent genius and mystery. This has led to many interpretations of his life and works, creating a legend out of the commoner from Stratford-upon-Avon who rose to prominence and in the process wrote many of the seminal works that provide the foundation for the current English language. His notable work is
“Hamlet”
“The Taming of the Shrew”
“Henry IV, Part 1”
“The Merry Wives of Windsor”
“A Midsummer Night’s Dream”
“Richard III”
First Folio
“Macbeth”
“King John”
“The Merchant of Venice”etc.
Hamlet is the world famous revenge play. Most of film industries try to making film plot of a Hamlet. Kenneth Branagh is a director, who tried to make film as well as hamlet its full based on William Shakespeare's Hamlet.
The movie is faithful in terms of the soliloquy and the dialogues spoken by the characters in the play. The main incidents like the madness of Ophelia, grave digging scene etc are very well shown in the film as similar to the way it is described in the original play, But there are many things in the movie which is different from the original play in terms of costumes, customs. Even in the film hamlet is portrayed as too old than the real Prince Hamlet in the play who is very young. there are many changes made in this film. The presence of ghost is shown by the movement of the sword of the statue whereas in the play the text is unable to show it dramatic movement.Even the falling of the statue at the end is also indicates a big change. So after watching the film my perception about the play, character and the situation is totally changed.
In the film the players came to enact on stage as per the instructions and some dialogues given by Hamlet.When they are performing the incident which relates to the life of Claudius, Gertrude and King Hamlet, both the husband and wife that is Claudius and Gertrude became fearful and Claudius leaves that place immediately.
Yes, I feel catharsis in the film when Ophelia gone mad. and the scene of Grave yard, hamlet saw Yoric's skull.
Yes the screening of the movie helps me a lot in better understanding of the play. because there were many character i understood to his relationship to another like Fortinbras, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern.

Hamlet

William Shakespeare was an English poet and playwright who is considered one of the greatest writers to ever use the English language. He is also the most famous playwright in the world, with his plays being translated in over 50 languages and performed across the globe for audiences of all ages. His works span tragedy, comedy, and historical works, both in poetry and prose. And although the man is the most-recognized playwright in the world, very little of his life is actually known. No known autobiographical letters or diaries have survived to modern day, and with no surviving descendants, Shakespeare is a figure both of magnificent genius and mystery. This has led to many interpretations of his life and works, creating a legend out of the commoner from Stratford-upon-Avon who rose to prominence and in the process wrote many of the seminal works that provide the foundation for the current English language. His notable work is
“Hamlet”
“The Taming of the Shrew”
“Henry IV, Part 1”
“The Merry Wives of Windsor”
“A Midsummer Night’s Dream”
“Richard III”
First Folio
“Macbeth”
“King John”
“The Merchant of Venice”etc.
Hamlet is the world famous revenge play. Most of film industries try to making film plot of a Hamlet. Kenneth Branagh is a director, who tried to make film as well as hamlet its full based on William Shakespeare's Hamlet.
The movie is faithful in terms of the soliloquy and the dialogues spoken by the characters in the play. The main incidents like the madness of Ophelia, grave digging scene etc are very well shown in the film as similar to the way it is described in the original play, But there are many things in the movie which is different from the original play in terms of costumes, customs. Even in the film hamlet is portrayed as too old than the real Prince Hamlet in the play who is very young. there are many changes made in this film. The presence of ghost is shown by the movement of the sword of the statue whereas in the play the text is unable to show it dramatic movement.Even the falling of the statue at the end is also indicates a big change. So after watching the film my perception about the play, character and the situation is totally changed.
In the film the players came to enact on stage as per the instructions and some dialogues given by Hamlet.When they are performing the incident which relates to the life of Claudius, Gertrude and King Hamlet, both the husband and wife that is Claudius and Gertrude became fearful and Claudius leaves that place immediately.
Yes, I feel catharsis in the film when Ophelia gone mad. and the scene of Grave yard, hamlet saw Yoric's skull.
Yes the screening of the movie helps me a lot in better understanding of the play. because there were many character i understood to his relationship to another like Fortinbras, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern.

Paheredar piya ki

I am support this Serial.
Pehredaar Piya Ki” serial is created by Shashi. Peheredaar piya ki’ Title suggest that pehredaar means protector and we can also found in this serial that Diya marries to Ratan for the sack of his protection The serial Pehredaar Piya Ki on Sony TV shows a 10 year boy married to a woman. who is much older to him.
This show is more controversial in the society because of its story. Storyline of this serial is that the 19 year young girl marry with 9 year little boy after his parents death for protect him towards his own evil family member. And also in this serial child marriage happened but they are not promoting it. society doesn't accept this kind of Marriage but media show this kinds of things and Many people request to ban this serial because of theme of child marriage but it is not first time came these kind of serial but many time came to in show for example " Gulal" , " Balika Vadhu".
So we can't say that it is a good serial or bad because its our entertainment. The Serial and Movies are making for our enjoyment. Of course it should be moral and effective. But some stories like 'Paheredar Piya ki', 'Balika vadhu', 'Kumkum Bhagya' etc making for entertainment and also a Ridiculous custom of Social, our culture. If the director has seen this type of scene in his/her serial, they indicate that this type of man and woman, how to face his/her situation. We can not tumble to it misguide us.

Tuesday 22 August 2017

Rangde Basanti Review

The literal meaning of the title is : "Paint me with the colours of spring".
    In first scene we see Indian youth ,they not at all interest in the serious life of India. We can say they simply just enjoying their life with bad habit like smoking ,drinking,racing .They also criticise the nation or freedom fighters.
    If we proceed further on the film while his friend dies in the plane crash accident but actually it was murder. After the death of his friend they choose the way of violence .They felt that this is the only way to get justice. They all remembers freedom fighters .In the end they all friends dies, but yet they all are happy......

Tuesday 18 July 2017

About my self

hello,
i am mahirpari goswami,
i have done my under greduation in shamaldas arts clg from mkb u..ni,
now i am study in smt.S.B.Gardi department of english.

2.1

  2.1 it's not only words wps office from Goswami Mahirpari