Tuesday 3 April 2018

Mahir Pari's Assignment on " Literary Term :- " Eco - Criticism "

 To evaluate my assignment click here



       SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


   Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
   Roll no :- 21
   Topic name :-  Literary Term :- " Eco - Criticism "
   Submitted to :- Department of English
   Paper name :- Literary Theory & Criticism: The 20th Western & Indian Poetics – 2:
   E - mail :- goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com
   Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021


                  Definition of postcolonial

---------> colonialism: The imperialist expansion of Europe into the rest of the world during the last four hundred years in which a dominant imperium or center carried on a relationship of control and influence over its margins or colonies. This relationship tended to extend to social, pedagogical, economic, political, and broadly culturally exchanges often with a hierarchical European settler class and local, educated (compractor) elite class forming layers between the European "mother" nation and the various indigenous peoples who were controlled. Such a system carried within it inherent notions of racial inferiority and exotic otherness.

post-colonialism: Broadly a study of the effects of colonialism on cultures and societies. It is concerned with both how European nations conquered and controlled "Third World" cultures and how these groups have since responded to and resisted those encroachments. Post-colonialism, as both a body of theory and a study of political and cultural change, has gone and continues to go through three broad stages:

an initial awareness of the social, psychological, and cultural inferiority enforced by being in a colonized state
the struggle for ethnic, cultural, and political autonomy
a growing awareness of cultural overlap and hybridity

             According to M h a Ibrahim

---------->.  


Postcolonial Studies. The critical analysis of the history, culture, litera-

ture, and modes of discourse that are specific to the former colonies of Eng-

land, Spain, France, and other European imperial powers. These studies have

focused especially on the Third World countries in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean

islands, and South America. Some scholars, however, extend the scope of such

analyses also to the discourse and cultural productions of such countries as

Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, which achieved independence much

earlier than the Third World countries. Postcolonial studies sometimes en-

compass also aspects of British literature in the eighteenth and nineteenth

centuries, viewed through a perspective that reveals the extent to which the

social and economic life represented in the literature was tacitly underwritten

by colonial exploitation.

An important text in establishing the theory and practice in this recently

developed field of study was Orientalism (1978) by the Palestinian-American

scholar Edward Said, which applied a revised form of Michel Foucault's his-

toricist critique of discourse (see under new historicism) to analyze what he

called "cultural imperialism." This mode of imperialism imposed its power

not by force, but by the effective means of disseminating in subjugated

colonies a Eurocentric discourse that assumed the normality and preeminence

of everything "occidental," correlatively with its representations of the "ori-

ental" as an exotic and inferior other. Since the 1980s, such analysis has been

supplemented by other theoretical principles and procedures, including Al-

thusser's redefinition of the Marxist theory of ideology and the deconstructive

theory of Derrida. The rapidly expanding field of postcolonial studies, as a re-

sult, is not a unified movement with a distinctive methodology. One can,

however, identify several central and recurrent issues:

(1) The rejection of the master-narrative of Western imperialism—in

which the colonial other is not only subordinated and marginalized,but in effect deleted as a cultural agency—and its replacement by a

counter-narrative in which the colonial cultures fight their way back

into a world history written by Europeans. The influential collection of

essays, The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Litera-

tures (1989), ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffins, stresses

what it terms the hybridization of colonial languages and cultures, in

which imperialist importations are superimposed on indigenous tradi-

tions; it also includes a number of postcolonial countertexts to the

hegemonic texts that present a Eurocentric version of colonial history.

(2) An abiding concern with the formation, within Western discursive

practices, of the colonial and postcolonial "subject," as well as of the

categories by means of which this subject conceives itself and per-

ceives the world within which it lives and acts. (See subject under post-

structuralism.) The subaltern has become a standard way to designate

the colonial subject that has been constructed by European discourse

and internalized by colonial peoples who employ this discourse;

"subaltern" is a British word for someone of inferior rank, and com-

bines the Latin terms for "under" (sub) and "other" (alter). A recurrent

topic of debate is how, and to what extent, a subaltern subject, writ-

ing in a European language, can manage to serve as an agent of resis-

tance against, rather than of compliance with, the very discourse that

has created its subordinate identity. See, e.g., Gayatri Chakravorty

Spivak, "Can the Subaltern Speak?" (1988), reprinted in The Postcolo-

nial Studies Reader, listed below.

(3) A major element in the postcolonial agenda is to disestablish Euro-

centric norms of literary and artistic values, and to expand the liter-

ary canon to include colonial and postcolonial writers. In the United

States and Britain, there is an increasingly successful movement to in-

clude, in the standard academic curricula, the brilliant and innova-

tive novels, poems, and plays by such postcolonial writers in the

English language as the Africans Chinua Achebe and Wole Soyinka,

the Caribbean islanders V. S. Naipaul and Derek Walcott, and the au-

thors from the Indian subcontinent G. V. Desani and Salman

Rushdie. See Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture (1994); and for a

survey of the large and growing body of literature in English by post-

colonial writers throughout the world, see Martin Coyle and others,

Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism (1990), pages 1113-1236.

A comprehensive anthology is The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (1995), ed.

Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. Refer also to Franz Fanon,

The Wretched of the Earth (trans., 1966); Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakravorti

Spivak, Selected Subaltern Studies (1988); Trinh T. Minh-ha, Woman, Native,

Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism (1989); Terry Eagleton, Fredric

Jameson, and Edward W. Said, Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature (1990);

Christopher L. Miller, Theories of Africans: Francophone Literature and Anthro-

pology in Africa (1990); Edward W. Said, Culture and Imperialism (1993).

                   History of postcolonial


------------> Since the 1980s, numerous novelists, dramatists, and poets have been marketed as postcolonial writers. But what is postcolonial literature? In the broadest terms, this category includes works that have a relationship to the subjugating forces of imperialism and colonial expansion. In short, postcolonial literature is that which has arisen primarily since the end of World War II from regions of the world undergoing decolonization. Works from such regions in the 20th and 21st centuries, such as the Indian subcontinent, Nigeria, South Africa, and numerous parts of the Caribbean, for example, might be described as postcolonial.


           The rise of postcolonial theory

----------> In order to understand the rising attention to postcolonial fiction, a basic understanding of postcolonial theory is necessary. Keep in mind, this is a very short history and is by no means all-inclusive! If you’re interested in postcolonial theory, you might start with some of the writers we’re about to discuss before moving onto your own explorations of the topic.

In 1961, Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth was published in French. Arising out of the Algerian struggle for independence from France, the text examined possibilities for anti-colonial violence in the region and elsewhere. Fanon was a Martinique-born intellectual who was also a member of the Algerian National Liberation Front, and his writings have inspired numerous people across the globe in struggles for freedom from oppression and racially motivated violence. If you’re particularly interested in Fanon as a collector, you might seek out first editions of Fanon’s work. Grove Press published the first U.S. edition of The Wretched of the Earth in 1963, with a translated forward by Jean-Paul Sartre.

By 1979, Edward Said had written Orientalism, a text examining the relationship between those in the West and the “Other” in the East. This work has become a staple in postcolonial courses, and it helped to expand the field over the last few decades. Said was a Palestinian-American scholar who taught at Columbia University for the majority of his academic career. Other important early thinkers in postcolonial theory, just to name a couple, include Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Homi Bhabha.


         Early Postcolonial writer's of Imaginative literature

--------> While the field of postcolonial studies only began taking shape in the late 1970s and early 1980s, numerous fiction writers began publishing works in the decades immediately following World War II. One of the most significant postcolonial novels to emerge in this period was Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart (1958). This novel now graces many Anglophone fiction course syllabi, which isn’t a surprise given its enormous popularity and importance when it first was published.

Published in the late 1950s, Achebe wrote the book at the end of the British colonial period in Nigeria but depicted an earlier moment in Nigerian history. The novel tells the story of Okonkwo, an Igbo village leader in the late 19th century who must witness the tragic demise of his culture at the hands of colonialism. Nigeria remained a British colony until 1960. If you’re interested in adding one of Achebe’s works to your collection, you might look for a first U.K. edition of Things Fall Apart, published by William Heinemann Ltd. in 1958, or a first American edition published a year later in New York by McDowell Obolensky.


Even before Chinua Achebe published Things Fall Apart, Nadine Gordimer had already written one book and several short-story collections, and she was in the process of publishing her second novel. A South African writer of Eastern European origin, Gordimer didn’t personally experience the racial discrimination and violence that arose from decolonization and the institution of apartheid, but she nonetheless spent her career advocating for equal rights in her country. Some of her most notable works that deal with postcolonial politics and the stark harms of apartheid include The Conservationist (1974), Burger’s Daughter (1979), and July’s People (1981). A signed copy of one of Gordimer’s works would make a fantastic edition to any postcolonial literature collection.

Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North (1966) is another significant and early work of postcolonial fiction. A bildungsroman of sorts, Salih’s novel follows an unnamed protagonist as he returns to his Sudanese village after years of education abroad in England only to learn of the devastating effects of imperialism. The novel was originally written in Arabic, and it was published in English for the first time in 1969.

When it comes to plays, Derek Walcott’s Dream on Monkey Mountain (1970) helped to set the world stage for postcolonial dramatists. A writer from Saint Lucia, Walcott’s works frequently depict the colonial harms of the West Indies. Indeed, his plays, as well as his poems, encourage his readers to question the history and politics of the Caribbean, and its role as a postcolonial site through which we might renegotiate remedies for imperialism.

Stay tuned for Part II of our brief history of postcolonial literatue, in which we'll explore contemporary writers who detail the postcolonial condition.


               Critical approaches

--------> Amongst prominent theorists are Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, Frantz Fanon, Bill Ashcroft, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o, Chinua Achebe, Leela Gandhi, Gareth Griffiths, Abiola Irele, John McLeod, Hamid Dabashi, Helen Tiffin, Khal Torabully, and Robert Young. Another important theorist is Harvard University professor Homi K Bhabha, (1949 – ). He is one of the most important figures in contemporary post-colonial studies, and has developed a number of the field's neologisms and key concepts, such as hybridity, mimicry, difference, and ambivalence.

Frantz Omar Fanon (1925 – 1961) was a Martinique-born Afro-Caribbean psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and writer whose works are influential in the fields of post-colonial studies, critical theory, and Marxism.[3] As an intellectual, Fanon was a political radical, Pan-Africanist, and a Marxist humanist concerned with the psychopathology of colonization,[4] and the human, social, and cultural consequences of decolonization.

Post-colonial literary theory re-examines colonial literature, especially concentrating upon the social discourse, between the colonizer and the colonized, that shaped and produced the literature. In Orientalism (1978), Edward Saïd analyzed the fiction of Honoré de Balzac, Charles Baudelaire, and Lautréamont (Isidore-Lucien Ducasse), and explored how they were influenced, and how they helped to shape the societal fantasy of European racial superiority. Post-colonial fiction writers deal with the traditional colonial discourse, either by modifying or by subverting it, or both.

The “anti-conquest narrative” recasts the indigenous inhabitants of colonized countries as victims rather than foes of the colonisers.[8] This depicts the colonised people in a more human light but risks absolving colonisers of responsibility for addressing the effects of colonisation by assuming that native inhabitants were "doomed" to their fate.

Mary Pratt, however, proposes a completely different theorization of "anti-conquest" than the ideas discussed here, that can be traced to Edward Said. Instead of referring to how natives resist colonization or are victims of it, Pratt analyzes European literatures in which a European narrates their adventures and struggles to survive in the land of the non-European Other.[9] The anti-conquest is a function of how the narrator writes him or her self out of being responsible for or an agent, direct or indirect, of colonization and colonialism. This different notion of anti-conquest is used to analyze the ways in which colonialism and colonization are legitimized nonetheless through entertaining stories of survival and adventure. Pratt created this unique notion in association with concepts of contact zone and transculturation, which have been very well received in Latin America social and human science circles.[citation needed] Négritude is a literary and ideological philosophy, developed by francophone African intellectuals, writers, and politicians in France during the 1930s. Its initiators included Martinican poet Aimé Césaire, Léopold Sédar Senghor (a future President of Senegal), and Léon Damas of French Guiana. Négritude intellectuals disapproved of French colonialism and claimed that the best strategy to oppose it was to encourage a common racial identity for native Africans worldwide.

                  Back to Africa movement
--------> Marcus Mosiah Garvey, Jr. (1887 – 1940),[10] was a Jamaican political leader, publisher, journalist, entrepreneur, and orator who was a proponent of the Pan-Africanism movement, to which end he founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League (UNIA-ACL).He also founded the Black Star Line, a shipping and passenger line which promoted the return of the African diaspora to their ancestral lands.

Prior to the 20th century, leaders such as Prince Hall, Martin Delany, Edward Wilmot Blyden, and Henry Highland Garnet advocated the involvement of the African diaspora in African affairs. Garvey was unique in advancing a Pan-African philosophy to inspire a global mass movement and economic empowerment focusing on Africa known as Garveyism.Promoted by the UNIA as a movement of African Redemption, Garveyism would eventually inspire others, ranging from the Nation of Islam to the Rastafari movement (some sects of which proclaim Garvey as a prophet).


                    Postcolonial feminist literature

--------->Postcolonial feminism is a form of feminism that developed as a response to the fact that feminism seemed to focus solely on the experiences of women in Western cultures. Postcolonial feminism seeks to account for the way that racism and the long-lasting political, economic, and cultural effects of colonialism affect non-white, non-Western women in the postcolonial world.

                    South Africa

-------->. Elleke Boehmer (cf. Cullhed, 2006: 79) writes, “Nationalism, like patriarchy, favours singleness—one identity, one growth pattern, one birth and blood for all ... [and] will promote specifically unitary or ‘one-eyed’ forms of consciousness.” The first problem any student of South African literature is confronted with, is the diversity of the literary systems. Gerrit Olivier notes, "While it is not unusual to hear academics and politicians talk about a 'South African literature', the situation at ground level is characterised by diversity and even fragmentation". Robert Mossman adds that "One of the enduring and saddest legacies of the apartheid system may be that no one – White, Black, Coloured (meaning of mixed-race in South Africa), or Asian – can ever speak as a "South African." The problem, however, pre-dates Apartheid significantly, as South Africa is a country made up of communities that have always been linguistically and culturally diverse. These cultures have all retained autonomy to some extent, making a compilation such as the controversial Southern African Literatures by Michael Chapman, difficult. Chapman raises the question:

[W]hose language, culture, or story can be said to have authority in South Africa when the end of apartheid has raised challenging questions as to what it is to be a South African, what it is to live in a new South Africa, whether South Africa is a nation, and, if so, what its mythos is, what requires to be forgotten and what remembered as we scour the past in order to understand the present and seek a path forward into an unknown future.

South Africa has 11 national languages: Afrikaans, English, Zulu, Xhosa, Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, Venda, SiSwati, Tsonga, and Ndebele. Any definitive literary history of South Africa should, it could be argued, discuss literature produced in all eleven languages. But the only literature ever to adopt characteristics that can be said to be "national" is Afrikaans. Olivier argues: "Of all the literatures in South Africa, Afrikaans literature has been the only one to have become a national literature in the sense that it developed a clear image of itself as a separate entity, and that by way of institutional entrenchment through teaching, distribution, a review culture, journals, etc. it could ensure the continuation of that concept." Part of the problem is that English literature has been seen within the greater context of English writing in the world, and has, because of English's global position as lingua franca, not been seen as autonomous or indigenous to South Africa – in Olivier’s words: "English literature in South Africa continues to be a sort of extension of British or international English literature." The African languages, on the other hand, are spoken across the borders of Southern Africa - for example, Tswana is spoken in Botswana, and Tsonga in Zimbabwe, and Sotho in Lesotho. South Africa's borders were drawn up by the British Empire and, as with all other colonies, these borders were drawn without regard for the people living within them. Therefore: in a history of South African literature, do we include all Tswana writers, or only the ones with South African citizenship? Chapman bypasses this problem by including "Southern" African literatures. The second problem with the African languages is accessibility, because since the African languages are regional languages, none of them can claim the readership on a national scale comparable to Afrikaans and English. Sotho, for instance, while transgressing the national borders of the RSA, is on the other hand mainly spoken in the Free State, and bears a great amount of relation to the language of Natal for example, Zulu. So the language cannot claim a national readership, while on the other hand being "international" in the sense that it transgresses the national borders.

Olivier argues that "There is no obvious reason why it should be unhealthy or abnormal for different literatures to co-exist in one country, each possessing its own infrastructure and allowing theoreticians to develop impressive theories about polysystems". Yet political idealism proposing a unified "South Africa" (a remnant of the colonial British approach) has seeped into literary discourse and demands a unified national literature, which does not exist and has to be fabricated. It is unrealistic to ever think of South Africa and South African literature as homogenous, now or in the near or distant future, since the only reason it is a country at all is the interference of European colonial powers. This is not a racial issue, but rather has to do with culture, heritage and tradition (and indeed the constitution celebrates diversity). Rather, it seems more sensible to discuss South African literature as literature produced within the national borders by the different cultures and language groups inhabiting these borders. Otherwise the danger is emphasising one literary system at the expense of another, and more often than not, the beneficiary is English, with the African languages being ignored. The distinction "black" and "white" literature is further a remnant of colonialism that should be replaced by drawing distinctions between literary systems based on language affiliation rather than race.


---------> The first texts produced by black authors were often inspired by missionaries and frequently deal with African history, in particular the history of kings such as Chaka. Modern South African writing in the African languages tends to play at writing realistically, at providing a mirror to society, and depicts the conflicts between rural and urban settings, between traditional and modern norms, racial conflicts and most recently, the problem of AIDS.

In the first half of the 20th century, epics largely dominated black writing: historical novels, such as Sol T. Plaatje’s Mhudi: An Epic of South African Native Life a Hundred Years Ago (1930), Thomas Mofolo’s Chaka (trans. 1925), and epic plays including those of H. I. E. Dhlomo, or heroic epic poetry such as the work of Mazizi Kunene. These texts “evince black African patriarchy in its traditional form, with men in authority, often as warriors or kings, and women as background figures of dependency, and/or mothers of the nation” (Cullhed, 2006: 21). Female literature in the African languages is severely limited because of the strong influence of patriarchy, but over the last decade or two society has changed much and it can be expected that more female voices will emerge.

The following are notable white South African writers in English: Athol Fugard, Nadine Gordimer, J. M. Coetzee, and Wilbur Smith. André Brink has written in both Afrikaans and English while Breyten Breytenbach writes primarily in Afrikaans, though many of their works have been translated into English. Dalene Matthee's (1938 – 2005) is another Afrikaner, best known for her four Forest Novels, written in and around the Knysna Forest, including Fiela se Kind (1985) (Fiela's Child).[35] Her books have been translated into fourteen languages, including English, French, and German.[36] and over a million copies have been sold worldwide.

                The Americas
                            Caribbean Islands
Maryse Condé (1937 – ) is a French (Guadeloupean) author of historical fiction, best known for her novel Segu (1984–1985).


                      West Indies

---------> An exemplar post-colonial novel is Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) by Jean Rhys (1890 – 1979), a mid-twentieth century novelist who was born and grew up in the Caribbean island of Dominica, though she was mainly resident in England from the age of 16. This novel is based on Jane Eyre (1847), by Charlotte Brontë, re-told from the perspective of a subaltern protagonist, Antoinette Conway. It is the story of Antoinette Cosway, a white Creole heiress, from the time of her youth in Jamaica, to her unhappy marriage to a certain English gentleman—he is never named by the author. He renames her to a prosaic Bertha, declares her mad, and requires her to relocate to England. Caught in an oppressive patriarchal society in which she fully belongs neither to the white Europeans nor the black Jamaicans, Cosway is Rhys' version of Brontë's devilish "madwoman in the attic." As with many postcolonial works, the novel deals with the themes of racial inequality and the harshness of displacement and assimilation. It is also concerned with power relations between men and women



----------> The term "West Indies" first began to achieve wide currency in the 1950s, when writers such as Samuel Selvon, John Hearne, Edgar Mittelholzer, V.S. Naipaul, and George Lamming began to be published in the United Kingdom.[39] A sense of a single literature developing across the islands was also encouraged in the 1940s by the BBC radio programme Caribbean Voices, which featured stories and poems written by West Indian authors, recorded in London under the direction of producer Henry Swanzy, and broadcast back to the islands.[40] Magazines such as Kyk-Over-Al in Guyana, Bim in Barbados, and Focus in Jamaica, which published work by writers from across the region, also encouraged links and helped build an audience.[41]

Many—perhaps most—West Indian writers have found it necessary to leave their home territories and base themselves in the United Kingdom, the United States, or Canada in order to make a living from their work—in some cases spending the greater parts of their careers away from the territories of their birth. Critics in their adopted territories might argue that, for instance, V. S. Naipaul ought to be considered a British writer instead of a Trinidadian writer, or Jamaica Kincaid and Paule Marshall American writers, but most West Indian readers and critics still consider these writers "West Indian".

West Indian literature ranges over subjects and themes as wide as those of any other "national" literature, but in general many West Indian writers share a special concern with questions of identity, ethnicity, and language that rise out of the Caribbean historical experience.

One unique and pervasive characteristic of Caribbean literature is the use of "dialect" forms of the national language, often termed creole. The various local variations in the language adopted from the colonial powers such as Britain, Spain, Portugal, France and the Netherlands, have been modified over the years within each country and each has developed a blend that is unique to their country. Many Caribbean authors in their writing switch liberally between the local variation - now commonly termed nation language - and the standard form of the language.[42] Two West Indian writers have won the Nobel Prize for Literature: Derek Walcott (1992), born in St. Lucia, resident mostly in Trinidad during the 1960s and '70s, and partly in the United States since then; and V. S. Naipaul, born in Trinidad and resident in the United Kingdom since the 1950. (Saint-John Perse, who won the Nobel Prize in 1960, was born in the French territory of Guadeloupe.)

Other notable names in (anglophone) Caribbean literature have included Earl Lovelace, Austin Clarke, Claude McKay, Orlando Patterson, Andrew Salkey, Edward Kamau Brathwaite (who was born in Barbados and has lived in Ghana and Jamaica), Linton Kwesi Johnson, and Michelle Cliff, to name only a few. In more recent times, a number of literary voices have emerged from the Caribbean as well as the Caribbean diaspora, including Kittitian Caryl Phillips (who has lived in the UK since one month of age), Edwidge Danticat, a Haitian immigrant to the United States; Anthony Kellman from Barbados, who divides his time between Barbados and the United States; Andrea Levy of the United Kingdom, Jamaicans Colin Channer and Marlon James, the author of the Man Booker Prize-winning novel A Brief History of Seven Killings (2014) (as well as John Crow's Devil, The Book of Night Women, the unpublished screenplay "Dead Men", and the short story "Under Cover of Darkness"), Antiguan Marie-Elena John, and Lasana M. Sekou from St. Maarten/St. Martin.

Earl Lovelace (1935 – ) is an award-winning Trinidadian novelist, journalist, playwright, and short story writer. He is particularly recognized for his descriptive, dramatic fiction on Trinidadian culture: "Using Trinidadian dialect patterns and standard English, he probes the paradoxes often inherent in social change as well as the clash between rural and urban cultures."[43] As Bernardine Evaristo notes, "Lovelace is unusual among celebrated Caribbean writers in that he has always lived in Trinidad. Most writers leave to find support for their literary endeavours elsewhere and this, arguably, shapes the literature, especially after long periods of exile. But Lovelace's fiction is deeply embedded in Trinidadian society and is written from the perspective of one whose ties to his homeland have never been broken


                       United States

------------>. American David Henry Hwang's play M. Butterfly addresses the Western perspective on China and the French as well as the American perspectives on Vietnam during the Vietnam War. It was inspired by Giacomo Puccini's opera Madama Butterfly.

Maxine Hong Kingston (1940– ) is a Chinese American author who has written three novels and several works of non-fiction about the experiences of Chinese immigrants living in the United States.

Bharati Mukherjee although of East Indian ancestry has gone on record that she considers herself an American writer, and not an Indian expatriate writer. In a 1989 interview with Amanda Meer, Mukherjee said: "I totally consider myself an American writer, and that has been my big battle: to get to realize that my roots as a writer are no longer, if they ever were, among Indian writers, but that I am writing about the territory about the feelings, of a new kind of pioneer here in America. I’m the first among Asian immigrants to be making this distinction between immigrant writing and expatriate writing. Most Indian writers prior to this, have still thought of themselves as Indians, and their literary inspiration, has come from India. India has been the source, and home. Whereas I’m saying, those are wonderful roots, but now my roots are here and my emotions are here in North America."

Jhumpa Lahiri (1967 –) is an Indian-American author. Lahiri's debut short story collection Interpreter of Maladies (1999) won the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, and her first novel, The Namesake (2003), was adapted into the popular film of the same name.


             African-American literature

------------>. Throughout American history, African Americans have been discriminated against and subject to racist attitudes. This experience inspired some Black writers, at least during the early years of African-American literature, to prove they were the equals of European-American authors. As Henry Louis Gates, Jr, has said, "it is fair to describe the subtext of the history of black letters as this urge to refute the claim that because blacks had no written traditions they were bearers of an inferior culture."

By refuting the claims of the dominant culture, African-American writers were also attempting to subvert the literary and power traditions of the United States. Some scholars assert that writing has traditionally been seen as "something defined by the dominant culture as a white male activity." This means that, in American society, literary acceptance has traditionally been intimately tied in with the very power dynamics which perpetrated such evils as racial discrimination. By borrowing from and incorporating the non-written oral traditions and folk life of the African diaspora, African-American literature broke "the mystique of connection between literary authority and patriarchal power." In producing their own literature, African Americans were able to establish their own literary traditions devoid of the white intellectual filter. This view of African-American literature as a tool in the struggle for Black political and cultural liberation has been stated for decades, perhaps most famously by W. E. B. Du Bois.


                        Native American Renaissance

---------------> Native American Renaissance is a term originally coined by critic Kenneth Lincoln in the 1983 book Native American Renaissance to categorise the significant increase in production of literary works by Native Americans in the United States in the late 1960s onwards. A. Robert Lee and Alan Velie note that the book's title "quickly gained currency as a term to describe the efflorescence on literary works that followed the publication of N. Scott Momaday's House Made of Dawn in 1968". Momaday's novel garnered critical acclaim, including the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1969.

Conclusion

          --------------> here I conclude this literary term postcolonial with his definition and brief history and some colonize Nations and the literature  and their major writers and their works I have written it.

Mahir pari's Assignment on ' Discuss the portrait of woman characters in "Oliver twist"


To evaluate my assignment click here


SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


      Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
      Roll no :- 21
      Topic name :- Discuss the portrait of woman characters in
"Oliver Twist"  
      Submitted to :- Department of English
      Paper name :- The Victorian Literature
      E - mail :- goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com
      Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021



                Brief introduction about author :- Charles Dickens

Charles John Huffam Dickens  was an English writer and social critic. He created some of the world's best-known fictional characters and is regarded by many as the greatest novelist of the Victorian era. His works enjoyed unprecedented popularity during his lifetime, and by the 20th century critics and scholars had recognised him as a literary genius. His novels and short stories enjoy lasting popularity.


Born :-  Charles John Huffam Dickens,7 February 1812Landport, Hampshire, England.
Died:-   9 June 1870 (aged 58)Higham, Kent, England,Resting place.Poets' Corner,
        Westminster Abbey
Occupation :- Writer
Nationality :- British
Notable works :- The Pickwick Papers,
               Oliver Twist,
               Nicholas Nickleby,
               A Christmas Carol,
               David Copperfield,
               Bleak House,
               Little Dorrit,
              A Tale of TwoCities,
               Great Expectations,


  Brief history of novel :-
                Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in 1830s England. His mother, whose name no one knows, is found on the street and dies just after Oliver’s birth. Oliver spends the first nine years of his life in a badly run home for young orphans and then is transferred to a workhouse for adults. After the other boys bully Oliver into asking for more gruel at the end of a meal, Mr. Bumble, the parish beadle, offers five pounds to anyone who will take the boy away from the workhouse. Oliver narrowly escapes being apprenticed to a brutish chimney sweep and is eventually apprenticed to a local undertaker, Mr. Sowerberry. When the undertaker’s other apprentice, Noah Claypole, makes disparaging comments about Oliver’s mother, Oliver attacks him and incurs the Sowerberrys’ wrath. Desperate, Oliver runs away at dawn and travels toward London.
Outside London, Oliver, starved and exhausted, meets Jack Dawkins, a boy his own age. Jack offers him shelter in the London house of his benefactor, Fagin . It turns out that Fagin is a career criminal who trains orphan boys to pick pockets for him. After a few days of training, Oliver is sent on a pickpocketing mission with two other boys. When he sees them swipe a handkerchief from an elderly gentleman, Oliver is horrified and runs off. He is caught but narrowly escapes being convicted of the theft. Mr. Brownlow, the man whose handkerchief was stolen, takes the feverish Oliver to his home and nurses him back to health. Mr. Brownlow is struck by Oliver’s resemblance to a portrait of a young woman that hangs in his house. Oliver thrives in Mr. Brownlow’s home, but two young adults in Fagin’s gang, Bill Sikes and his lover Nancy, capture Oliver and return him to Fagin.
Fagin sends Oliver to assist Sikes in a burglary. Oliver is shot by a servant of the house and, after Sikes escapes, is taken in by the women who live there, Mrs. Maylie and her beautiful adopted niece Rose. They grow fond of Oliver, and he spends an idyllic summer with them in the countryside. But Fagin and a mysterious man named Monks are set on recapturing Oliver. Meanwhile, it is revealed that Oliver’s mother left behind a gold locket when she died. Monks obtains and destroys that locket. When the Maylies come to London, Nancy meets secretly with Rose and informs her of Fagin’s designs, but a member of Fagin’s gang overhears the conversation. When word of Nancy’s disclosure reaches Sikes, he brutally murders Nancy and flees London. Pursued by his guilty conscience and an angry mob, he inadvertently hangs himself while trying to escape.
Mr. Brownlow, with whom the Maylies have reunited Oliver, confronts Monks and wrings the truth about Oliver’s parentage from him. It is revealed that Monks is Oliver’s half brother. Their father, Mr. Leeford, was unhappily married to a wealthy woman and had an affair with Oliver’s mother, Agnes Fleming. Monks has been pursuing Oliver all along in the hopes of ensuring that his half-brother is deprived of his share of the family inheritance. Mr. Brownlow forces Monks to sign over Oliver’s share to Oliver. Moreover, it is discovered that Rose is Agnes’s younger sister, hence Oliver’s aunt. Fagin is hung for his crimes. Finally, Mr. Brownlow adopts Oliver, and they and the Maylies retire to a blissful existence in the countryside.









           Women character in Oliver Twist



1.)  Nancy


2.)  Rose maylie


3.)  Agen's Fleming


4.)  Mrs. Maylie


5.)  Mrs. Corney


6.)  Mrs. Bedwin


7.)  Monkes's mother


8.)  Mrs. Sowerberry


9.)  Mrs.Mann        
       
             



                             Nancy

Nancy is a fictional character in the novel Oliver Twist and its numerous theatre , television and motion picture adaptations. She is a member of Fagin's gang and the lover , and eventual victim, of Bill Sikes .

Though it is never explicitly stated in the novel, it is strongly implied that Nancy is a prostitute as well as a thief. Dickens expressly asserted this in his preface to the novel's 1841 edition ("the boys are pickpockets, and the girl is a prostitute").
Despite her criminality , Nancy is portrayed as a
sympathetic figure, whose concern for Oliver overcomes her loyalty to Sikes and Fagin. By the climax of the novel she is emaciated with sickness and worry, and filled with guilt about the life she is leading.

                            Background
Nancy was tainted and played at a young age by
Fagin , the receiver of stolen goods who persuades downtrodden youths to do his bidding. Her exact age is not mentioned in the book, although she says she has been a thief for 12 years (and began working for Fagin when she was half Oliver's age). From this it can be deduced that she is probably around seventeen. She is typically depicted in her teens or mid 20s in film versions of the novel. She apparently looks older than her years, as she tells Rose Maylie "I am younger than you would think, to look at me, but I am well used to it."
Nancy is one of the members of Fagin's gang that few, if any, know about in central London, since she has recently moved from the suburbs — something referred to by Sikes when he and Fagin, concerned that Oliver might inform on them, are trying to convince her to attend his impending trial after he is mistakenly arrested for pickpocketing ("No one around here knows anything about you"). Her excuse for not attending is that she does not wish anyone to know about her; nevertheless, she winds up attending it, presumably after having been physically threatened by Sikes.


                          Description
In the novel she drinks heavily. She is described thus when she first appears:
“ A couple of young ladies called to see the young gentlemen; one of whom was named Bet, and the other Nancy. They wore a good deal of hair, not very neatly turned up behind, and were rather untidy about the shoes and stockings. They were not exactly pretty, perhaps; but they had a great deal of colour in their faces, and looked quite stout and hearty." ”
In the original illustrations by George Cruikshank , Nancy is depicted as stout and fleshy, with a round, bulbous face.
By the end of the novel Nancy has dramatically lost weight through anxiety. She is described as "so pale and reduced with watching and privation, that there would have been considerable difficulty in recognising her as the same Nancy who has already figured in this tale."
In the preface Dickens says in writing dialogue for Nancy, he deliberately avoided using the crude language that would have been used by a real person like Nancy:
“ No less consulting my own taste, than the manners of the age, I endeavoured, while I painted it in all its fallen and degraded aspect, to banish from the lips of the lowest character I introduced, any expression that could by possibility offend; and rather to lead to the unavoidable inference that its existence was of the most debased and vicious kind, than to prove it elaborately by words and deeds. In the case of the girl, in particular, I kept this intention constantly in view.  ”
Instead Nancy and her friend Bet are introduced using faux-genteel terminology, portrayed as if seen though Oliver's innocent eyes, but recognisably ironic to the reader. Bet's brash refusal to get something for Fagin is described as "a polite and delicate evasion of the request" showing "the young lady to have been possessed of natural good-breeding." [5] Nancy's visit to the magistrates is described in similar language. Only later, when Nancy speaks to Rose, does she explicitly describe herself as degraded and corrupted. Their criminal enterprises are spoken of in euphemisms, creating for the reader a "game of guessing the crime".

                       Relationship to Oliver

Nancy, who is fiercely protective of Oliver and harbors a great deal of motherly affection and pity for him, tries to prevent him from being kidnapped a second time, after Oliver has finally managed to find safety in the household of the Maylie family, whom Sikes tried unsuccessfully to rob. She gives Rose Maylie and Mr. Brownlow , Oliver's benefactor, information about Oliver's evil half-brother Monks , who is in league with Fagin. However, she has managed to keep Bill's name out of it. But Fagin has sent a spy (Noah) out after her, and when the spy reports on what he has heard and seen, Fagin, furious at what she has done, tells Sikes about her actions. However, he twists the story just enough to make it sound as if she informed on him, knowing that this will probably result in her being murdered and thus silenced. It is her murder and the subsequent search for Sikes, her killer, that helps bring down Fagin's gang.
Nancy commits one of the most noble acts of kindness in the story when she ultimately defies Bill, in order to help Oliver to a better life, and she is subsequently martyred for it . Her character represented Dickens' view that a person, however tainted by society, could still retain a sense of good and redeem for past crimes. One of the main reasons Dickens puts Nancy in Oliver Twist is so that she can be contrasted with the pure, gentle Rose Maylie .

                            Role of the character

Dickens was criticized for using a character that was a thief. Dickens, however, defended his decision in the Preface to the story when it appeared in novel-form, explaining that it was his intention to show criminals, however petty, in "all their deformity", and that he had thought that dressing Nancy in anything other than "a cheap shawl" would make her seem more fanciful than real as a character.
Nancy is one of literature's earliest examples of the
stock character of the “ tart with a heart ”—the stereotypical character of a tragic or fallen woman who makes her way through life through crime but is still a good and compassionate person.

                               Rose Maylie

Rose Fleming Maylie is a character in Charles Dickens ' novel Oliver Twist, who is eventually discovered to be Oliver's maternal aunt. Though she plays a significant role in the novel, she is often omitted from dramatisations of the story.

                               Role
Rose is portrayed as pure, innocent and beautiful. Seventeen years old at the time of the novel's events, she is set up as a dramatic foil to Nancy , who is around the same age and sees her own degradation in contrast to Rose.

                               Biography

Rose is an orphan whose original surname was Fleming. She is raised from childhood by Mrs. Maylie, who adopted her from a poor family who were looking after her. She refers to Rose as her niece.  Rose is haunted by the thought that she may be illegitimate, and so she rejects the suit of Mrs. Maylie's son Harry for fear that marriage to her may harm his career in the church.
Bill Sikes and Toby Crackit, two thieves, break into the Maylies' house, accompanied by Oliver, who they use to get access, as he is small enough to climb through a window. Oliver is shot and wounded by Giles, the butler of the Maylies.
Later, Rose learns about Oliver's plight from Nancy. She offers to help Nancy escape from Sikes, but Nancy refuses to leave him. Rose teams up with Mr. Brownlow to rescue Oliver. It is later revealed that she is Oliver's aunt.  Her sister Agnes Fleming was Oliver's mother. Like Oliver, she was a victim of
Monks ' plotting.
Towards the end of the novel Rose becomes seriously ill and is apparently on the point of death. Harry hastens to her side and declares his love for her. She recovers and the couple are married.

                Notable portrayals

Rose Maylie is completely omitted from the musical
Oliver! and the film thereof. She is also missing from the 1948 and 2005 film versions of the novel. Often Rose's familial relationships differ from those of the original novel, with Mr. Brownlow (with whom she had no connection before bonding over their acquaintances with Oliver in the novel) occasionally appearing as her uncle or adopted guardian.

                 Minor character of Oliver Twice
                               Agnes Fleming


Oliver’s mother. After falling in love with and becoming pregnant by Mr. Leeford, she chooses to die anonymously in a workhouse rather than stain her family’s reputation. A retired naval officer’s daughter, she was a beautiful, loving woman. Oliver’s face closely resembles hers.

                                   Mrs. Maylie
A kind, wealthy older woman, the mother of Harry Maylie and adoptive “aunt” of Rose.

                                   Mrs. Corney

The matron of the workhouse where Oliver is born. Mrs. Corney is hypocritical, callous, and materialistic. After she marries Mr. Bumble, she hounds him mercilessly.

                                  Mrs.Bedwin
Mr. Brownlow’s kindhearted housekeeper. Mrs. Bedwin is unwilling to believe Mr. Bumble’s negative report of Oliver’s character.
                             
                             
                                  Monks's mother
An heiress who lived a decadent life and alienated her husband, Mr. Leeford. Monks’s mother destroyed Mr. Leeford’s will, which left part of his property to Oliver. Much of Monks’s nastiness is presumably inherited from her.

                                 Mrs.Sowerberry
Sowerberry’s wife. Mrs. Sowerberry is a mean, judgmental woman who henpecks her husband.

                                 Mrs.Mann
The superintendent of the juvenile workhouse where Oliver is raised. Mrs. Mann physically abuses and half-starves the children in her care.

             Conclusion
                        :- in that way we can see it how the women character are portrait in Oliver Twist and how to play Vital role in this novel.

Mahir pari's Assignment on " Write a not on science versus nature in "Frankenstein"


     

To evaluate my assignment click here

SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


   Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
   Roll no :- 21
   Topic name :-  Write a not on
                  Science Versus    
                  nature in
                  Frankenstein
   Submitted to :- Department of
                   English
   Papername :-The Romantic Literature
   E-mail:-goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com  Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021

                       

                   Nature vs. Science


 Throughout the novel Victor constantly seeks solace through nature immediatel after multiple traumatic deaths of his famiily member The serene beauty of the natural scenery he vesets often diminishes his feeling's of sadness worry and guiilt and proovides him with a somewhat restor
sense of hope in the world This portrayal of nature as a source of comfort recurs commonly in the genre of Romanticism
In contrasted the novel also incorporates Victors immmense fascination:s  with the vast opportunetees that science supplies While studying in Ingolstadt he obsesses over the idea of manipullating life's and isolates himself with his studies to accomplish this feat and expand humanitys power However as bringing the dead back to life goes against the natural flow of nature it is a major Pandoras Box in the field of science Because of this nature rejjjects Victor and punishes him through his creatttion The monster harms ever yone who he cares about and although Victor finds momentary comfort from his woes through nature nature can no longer act as a longlasting source of protection for him Instead the monster often encounters and worries Vicctor during his nature trips and thus slowly destroys his imprreession of nature as a serene place of relaxations By the end of the novel Victor becomes so consumed by hatred for his creation that his solely wishes to hunt down the monster no longer depending on nature nor seeking any serenity from it
Through Victors stor
 Shelley may have wanted to warn us of the dangers of the vast power of scienceed In an era with such rapidly evolving science and technolog the advancements may come sooner than we can prepare our society to deal with the consequences At the end of the novel Walton decides to abandon his ambitious yet dangerous expedition to the North Pol reflecting on Victors disastrous mistake of taking too big a risk for science

The comforting and soothing qualities of nature revitalize the characters This romantic theme is present though out the novel as both Victor and the monster return to nature to be comf orted Nat ure seems to sooth both characters and this is strange because Victor is a man of science and the mon ster is most defiantly unn atural

About this time we retired to our house at Belrive This change was particularly agreeable to me The shutting of the gates regularly at ten oclock and the impossibility of remaining on the lake after that hour had rendered our residence within the walls of Geneva very irksome to me
I was now freee Often after the rest of the family had retired for the night I took the boat and passed many hours upon the water. DoverThrift ed
Call of Duty


There is a sense of duty and responsibilllity in creatting some-thing as importan'st as a life Victor almost as a parent births a creature then fails to take responsibili for the life he has created. He does not realize that his actions of creation have conseqqquences Victor fails in his duty to care for the life he has crreeated Because the monster is not loved or carred for he un-leashes a striing of violent acts on his creator''s family

Victor like a father has a duty to care for the life he created and consssequently he lost all he truly cared for

I expected this reception said the daemon
All men hate the wretched how thenmust I be hated who am miserable beyond all living things Yet you my creator detest and spurn me thy creatur to whom thooou art bound by ties only dissoluble by the annihilation of one of us. You pu rpose to killll me How dare you sport thus with life?!? Do your duty towards me and I will do mine towards you and the rest of mankind If you will comply with my conditions I will leave them and you at peace and lbut if you refuse I will glut the maw of deaths until it be satiated with the blood of your remaining friends.


Nature vs. Science
(the natural vs. the unnatural)
Througgghout the novel therte is this constant battle between science and nature that is  the unnatural and the natural
 Victors creation represents science or the unnatural Frankenstein s crea-tion of this mo0nster throws nature into a state of imbal-ance which causes the eventtual destruction of Victor and his entire familyy Also' as this is a frame tale Victors loooss in the batttle betw-een nature and science is shown to be a warning for Walton as he too probes dangerously close to discovering nature's secrets
It's productions and features may be wi-thout exa-mple as the phen00omena of the heavvenly bodies undoubtedly are in those undiscovered solitudes What may not be expected in a country of eternal light!?!? I may there discover the wondrous power which attracts the needle and may reguuulate a thousand celestial observations that require only this voyage to render their seeming eccentricities consistent forever
You seek for know-ledge and wisdom  as I once did and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you as mine has been .


Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus is a famous novel written by Mary Shelley The novel warns about the misuse of science and relates the phenomenal assapect of scientific's  disasssters with the accidentaled creation of a monster named Frankenstein as a result of an un-successful scien-tific experiment The name "Frankenstein" the novel's human proottagonist is often incorrectly used to refer to the monster itself The novel resonates with philosoph-ical and moral ramifications creating a con0flict bet-ween Science and Nature along with the responsibility to cultivate nature themes the good versus evil and the social ambition to dominate against readers  attention and consideration of the most sensitive issues of our time

Frankenstein is one of the most acclaimed and thoought-proovoking stories that warns about scientific research and the “abuse” of scientific processes Shelley'ss novel is a metaphor for technology that can cause mullltiple problems in the modern world The novel mainly revolves around the dangeers asso-ciated with the acquisition of know-ledge and the happpiness of an uninformed or illi terate person who treats his native town as his world  The novel provides hidden praise for a lack of knowl edge that can lead to enjo ying the sim ple pleasures of life, rather than indul ging oneself in destructive acti vit ies with the misuse of knowledge and scientific explanat ions
Science's  is more than facts and prin ciples which have been acce pted on the basis of the knowl edge gained by syste matic studies A scientific process is the common pathway which is the basis for knowledge discovery
 The good or bad consequences resulting from scientific know- ledge are not the main concerns of scientists despite the powerful impact of these implic ations Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein” shows how knowledge discovery may influence the Earth in an adverse manner when a scientist does not consider the aftermath of his actions
In the innovative novel Mary Shelley notifies a grabbing tale of unimaginable happenings in which several dead body components are conveyed to life through one man's obsession with information and science Victor Franke nstein becomes engros sed with the concept of conveying life to an inan imate object but not ever recognizes the obliga tions he will have to the monster
 Altho ugh Victor prim arily dedicates a large piece of his life to conceiving his masterpiece he expe nds more of his life fearing and battling his monst er. Victor seems to disre gard any blame he has for his creation and only feels guilt in unleashing such a monster, other than guilt in leaving behind the monster
Instead of taking liabi lity for the being he has conveyed to life,  Victor wastelands the one-by-one an d obscurely changes the blameless animal into a monster Victor neglects any respon sibilit ies consi dering his creation and by rejec ting him love learning and a companion in humanity Victor keeps the blame for the mons ter's crimes The discovery by Victor was not a fully formed human being rather this experiment produced a deformed and defiled creature resembllling human

In the book Frankenstein we see the juxtaposition of nature and science Does science trump nature or does nature take the crown??? We argue that nature wins out in the end
Dr. Victor's  Frankenstein is a man of sci ence. He creates his monster through his knowledge of science and how to recreate dead body parts In the creation of the monster science wins out Science is what created the monster and gave him life
 but it does not win out in the end
The monster runs awa y and contin ually watches a fam ily live their lives Throu ghout this time the monster is living in nature and living off nature This is where the monster learns He learns to speak he learns how geography and he lea rns about emotions It is no coincidence that Franke nstein’ s monster leearns all of this out side of the lab and in nat ure This is also the place  that the monster has some self-aware ness and figur es out who he is He develops emotions and learns what love and caring isl He is attacked by the family when he tries to talk to them  but he doesne’t fight back even knowing he could tear them apart, because he cares for them  The monster learns about himself and becomes more human outside in nature
On the flip side  Frankenstein himself becomes less happy less human and more miserable without nature
 He is cons umed in his science and turns into a somewhat bad person When he is at home he is depressed and the only time he can gain some semblance of happiness is when he is out in nature.
While we see the creation happ en in a la b  science we see a lot of the intera ction between the two men, Frankenstein and his monster, happening outside, on an ice patch or moun tain nature
There is no doubt a juxtap osition between good and bad happy and sad and nature and science  Science is looked at as trying to harness nature and create it  and while this is tru nature is where the monster grew it is where he became self-aware.l The monster was created in a lab , but he eventually went back to nature and assimilated into nature once againWhile science tries toplay god no matter what happens nature will run its course. The natural order of nature will prevail no matter what Nature is according to Frankenstein a more powerful force than science

Nature versus nurture is a debate of importance of one'’s qualities when born or of their personal experiences leading them to the point where they are today

 “You got your green eyes from your mother and your freckles from your father. But where did you get your thrill-seeking personality and talent for singing?”

 Kimb erly raises a question that has been asked for centu ries, “Do you le arn this gro wing up, or did you genetically inherit these traits??!? One of the themes of Frankens tein is nature versus nurture The author Mary Wollst onecraft Shelly was born and raised in London
 England .l Shelley’s first and most famous novel was Frank enstein. Victor Frankenstein the main character in the novel creates a creature using


it is still a great er evil to me that I am self-e ducated: for the first fourte en years of my life I ran wild on a common and read nothing but our Uncle Thomas' boo ks of voyage”  The nature of every young boy is to be outside and play with their friends Buttt since Walton enjoyed reading his Uncles book s, he spent a lot of time al one and did not have many fri ends This conti nued throughout his life and even up to the point on the ship Also reading about his Uncles voyages gave Walton an ambition to go out and explore his World Yet Waltonno’s father was dying and his guardianl, Walt on’s Uncle, did not let him have an adventu re of his own, "These volumes we re my study day and night, and my familiarity with them increased that r egret which I had f elt, as a child, on learn ing my father's dying injunction had forbidden my uncle to allow me to embark in a seaf ari ng life"  After read ing his Uncles books, Walton wan ted to live a life like his, to go out and make his own advent ures. But since Walton’s fath er was dying, he was held  back from what he truly wa nted. This made his ambi tion for adventure gre ater and grea

ter Once Walton had inherited a large sum of money, it made his dreams poss ible. Walton had listened to his Uncle and been secl uded his entire life but when the oppor tunity arose he was able to go to sea,
"You are well acquainted with my fai lure a nd how heavily I bore the disappoi ntment
 But just at that time I inher ited the fort une of my

Friday 30 March 2018

MARIo VARGS LLOSA

8 issues are discuss in this blog. Here I have try to give my opinion on this debate

1.) Liberal.

2.) Nationalism.

3.) Populism.

4.) Greatest challenge to " Democracy ".

5.) Intellectual honest.

6.)  Literature and morality.

7.) Political correctness and freedom.

8.) Technology .

       These all are the 20th centuries major burning issue or debatable issue  we see it.

1.) Liberals :-

                     Liberalism is connected with Freedom of everything whatever we have in our constitution that's called Liberty but nowadays we find that there is no Liberty .






2.) Nationalism :-
                                Nationalism is one of the philosophy of political but nowadays we find that in democracy if you raise your voice against to the government you became Anti National or terrorist and other thing.
           Now a days people are believe in fake nationality and there try to prove nationalit
By if you believe in government and never ask about that policies and alwaysobey the government then you become good Nationalised.
   





3.) Populism :-
                           Populism is a political philosophy supporting the rights and power of the people in their struggle against a privileged elite.  Critics of populism have described it as a political approach that seeks to disrupt the existing social order by solidifying and mobilizing the animosity of the "commoner " or " the people" against "privileged elites " and the " establishment ". Populists can fall anywhere on the traditional left–right political spectrum of politics and often portray both bourgeois capitalists and
socialist organizers as unfairly dominating the political sphere.                        




So we find that how populism is work how the class discrimination happen in politics we can find it.

4.) Greatest challenge to " Democracy ".
                                                 :- so many problem we see  in our day to day life but in democracy there are so many challenge have to face just like:-
 [1.] unemployment;

[2.] poverty ;

[3.] bad health ;

[4.]  education more to word to the;

 [5.] capitalism and ;

[6.]  other social problem some religion problem also.


5.) Intellectual honesty
                                           :- nowadays v find that people are become more intellectual but not honest just like after getting education they become good human beings but now a days they became more and more Evil rather than illiterate person harmful for society but it's more dangerous to our society.


6.) Literature and morality .
                                                   :- in 20th century we see that literature transform into digitalise world and also its now reflect on television or movie just because nowadays literature  reflected in this all stream and we see that the now upcoming literature Re was not good just because its come with entertainment but not come with moral philosophy.




7.) Political correctness and freedom  :- 20th century we see that all the party those who are in democracy we see that they are trying to prove that what their leader say is always right and their opposition are always wrong we see it .
                            And nowadays we cannot find freedom in politics nowadays people are more become narrow minded egoistic and there is no space for freedomness.


So this image can also explain the political condition and the freedom in 20th century politics.

8.) Technology
                          :- you feel that Technology is for make our life easy but now we see that the technology is consuming our most of time and v not focus on our ambition.
                                  We feel that Technology is our servant but nowadays we find that Technology became master and we became and servant of Technology.
Here I want to give an example :-
                     
                       " Robot Sophia "




Saudi Arabia grants citizenship to robot Sophia
Saudi Arabia claims to be the first country to have granted citizenship to a robot. But the decision has garnered mockery from social media users as the robot may have more rights than human women in the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia granted citizenship to a humanoid robot, it announced at an innovation conference in Riyadh this week. It claims to be the first nation to bestow citizenship upon a robot.


                                At the end I will give only one suggestion that first we have to change then and then our society our nation and the world become peaceful for everyone so good things begin with us so we have to change we have to make change then other can change.





Sunday 4 March 2018

Cultural studies media and power

  Power
======> power is we feel day to day life also in civil society or democracy we find it How power works
         In democracy , people, make power but originally we know the government not power but the corporate world is in power and we find that the government never gives decision but the corporate world behind the government they are the ruler and they are ruling on us

========> " power "  definition <=======

°°°°°°°° is the ability to make other do what you would have them do °°°°°°°°

Where we find power real example just like:-

1). Family .
             




2). Worek please
 



3). Relationship
                       



In this three example we can find it
°°°° first image of family that the head of the family means grandfather isn't centre
Its means always that grandparents are in centre
°°°° in second example we find that the boss is incentre another hour near to sit around the Boss
°°°°° in third example we find that the rose is the centre of the relationship and one more thing that we always find that when we say relationship the image always come in mind that one boy and one girl that is the old mentality of our human beings we cannot accept " third genders relationship" in our society it's our truly bad we believe.

========> source of civi arene or civi power <========
           °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
1). Physical force
                                           











So physical force India has a largest democracy in the all over the world and we find that in J&K is very sensitive part of India and we usually see that the youngster raise their voice against to the police and the Army so and we always find the news in that conflict between young star and Indian army and police so but nobody a debate on that why the
J&K youngster are why come on the street with stone why they are not study nobody Where's debate on this topic.

2). Wealth







So in this image we can find it that if you have wealth then you can control market business and you can control government also and you can make policy on your self improve or get more and more interest by control to the market on government also just be call Wells is now a days become a symbol of power if you have wealth then you can do whatever you want you can buy anything and you can make lo adjust with your own attitude

3). State action
     














So in this two image we find that the naxalite is dangerous for our or society we we we believe that but how the state action or central government  deal with naxalite we have seen day today's newspaper always be find it but the what is the origin of the naxalite we are forgotten why just because our government hide it what is the original motive of there.
       And here in this video we find that the example of election that we elect to the person to make government but after making government they forgotten the people those who are maker.

4). Social norms
             














So in this all three images are describe Indian politics is much more depend on religion and we can find so many other Institute the provoked the democracy and we find it so many time the religion Institute so much powerful then the government.

5). Idea
     

 In few days in India there is a debate behind that ruling parties member said that if youth start make "Pakoda fry " hey are also get employee there's no need for government jobs just because they are so much money after running small that type of shop.

6). Number
           



Show in history we find them number of people come and make a change in patriarchy in Indian history mediaeval India we find an example of a Razia Sultana she was the first a lady king come on to the Delhi thorn and she was elected by the Delhi's people so in history we find the first democracy in our India.

                           =======> How power works<========
                                    °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
1). Power is never static

Its means that always power change the role in society in Science everywhere we can find that power always changing or movable

2). Power just like water
                     Just like we elected two person not elect to the government and after that government make rules and regulation and we have to follow we Happy or not happy with the rule but we still have to follow in this video we find this example .

3). Power is compaund










  *** how to observe ***
     °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
1) .Workplace politics
                   We always find that the in government offices are very lazy to work and they are not interested to obey their duties and discipline leave work

2). Organisation labour
                     All over the world we find that that type of association those who are working for the right for labours after Industrial Revolution we find that the human values are losing and Technology become more and more powerful that's why we may have to make that type of organisation

3). Government suppression
                         I give your current examples then we can understand very well
               




So now I have to nothing to say but we all understood what I am trying to say and people very well understood what I am saying

4). Corporate influence
               






So at the end I am just say that corporate world very influence in 21st century just because corporate world take all our daily routine to politics just because corporate world can do it that's why we can say that the corporate world can influence to up to the bottom people's life.


            ========> what we have to do is <========
                      °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
First to think that I can write it and I can read it and raise your voice against to the government governments wrong policy raise your voice write your voice and make sure two people convince also is measure important thing whenever you raise your voice your voice will be stop by other powerful person but don't afraid and keep climbing keep climbing you can get success and try it with basically to the your neighbourhood start with them they start with your society then your city city to state state two Nation then and then you can change the mentality of the world that's why the one thought can change your life but one return letter can change all over the system.




2.1

  2.1 it's not only words wps office from Goswami Mahirpari