Wednesday 4 April 2018

Mathew Arnold :- Thinking Activity



1 write about the one idea of Mathew Arnold which you find interesting and relevant in our time.

Answer : 'A study of poetry ' is a critical essay by Mathew Arnold.
 In this he criticises upon Art of poetry and Art of Criticism.
 He gives definition of poetry that " Poetry is the criticism of life " .
It is true that poet is critic of life and after criticising the life he became a poet .
 So this thing is also relevant and true that poet is critic of life .
    He also discussed the idea of disinterested or detachment.
It is interesting also relevant in our time. Mathew Arnold says about the first principle of criticism is the Disinterested and Detachment .
Disinterested on the part of the critic :- 1) implies freedom from all the prejudice, personal and historical.
2.)  work of literature , criticise or judged , independent work , considering its effects on author or the reader,
3.)  It should be free from all the prejudice either it historical or personal. It is very important thing for the fair judgement for the critic.

That's why its relevant our time and we can apply also in our modern literature and this theory will give amazing and new or different look towards to the our literature  and different way to analyse or criticize over literature .

About "Touch stone method "

The Study of Poetry: a shift in position - the touchstone method
Arnold's criticism of Vitet above illustrates his 'touchstone method'; his theory that in order to judge a poet's work properly, a critic should compare it to passages taken from works of great masters of poetry, and that these passages should be applied as touchstones to other poetry. Even a single line or selected quotation will serve the purpose.
From this we see that he has shifted his position from that expressed in the preface to his Poems of 1853. In
The Study of Poetry he no longer uses the acid test of action and architectonics. He became an advocate of 'touchstones'. 'Short passages even single lines,' he said, 'will serve our turn quite sufficiently'.
Some of Arnold's touchstone passages are: Helen's words about her wounded brother, Zeus addressing the horses of Peleus, suppliant Achilles' words to Priam, and from Dante; Ugolino's brave words, and Beatrice's loving words to Virgil.
From non-Classical writers he selects from Henry IV Part II (III, i), Henry's expostulation with sleep - 'Wilt thou upon the high and giddy mast . . . '. From Hamlet (V, ii) 'Absent thee from felicity awhile . . . '. From Milton's
Paradise Lost Book 1, 'Care sat on his faded cheek . . .', and 'What is else not to be overcome . . . '


2 ) writer about one idea of Mathew Arnold which you find out of date and irrelevant in our time.

Answer :  Mathew Arnold 's idea about " Touch - Stone  Method "  is out of date and irrelevant in our time. Because it providing comparison and analysis as the two primary tools for judging individual poet by comparing with the old authors . It is not fair thing because of the time and situations are keep changing on. May be the literature written in the old times is  right according to the situation and the time of that era but now it is not appropriate to comparison with the current literature or literary writer with the old literature or writer. Because the situation is changed. You not passing judgement on the bases of comparison with others.In the other way you ignored or not give much importance to their individual talents. It is not appropriate way to give any judgement which is based on the comparison with others.



Tuesday 3 April 2018

Mahir Pari 's assignment on Paul Virilio and " Hypermodernism "


To evaluate my assignment click here

        SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


      Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
      Roll no :- 21
      Topic name :- Paul Virilio and
                    Hypermodernsim
      Submitted to :- Department of
                      English
      Paper name :- Culture Studies
 
 E-mail:-goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com
      Enrollmentno:- 20691084201180021



Paul Virilio is one of the  most signifi cant French cultural theor ists writing today Increas ingly hailed as the inventor of conce pts such as 'drom ology' the "science" of speed Virilio is renowned for his declara-tion that the logic of accel- eration lies at the hear t of the orga nization and transfor mation of the mode rn worldd  However Virili o's tho ught rema ins much misunde rstood by many postm odern cultu ral theorists In this article l and supporting the ground-breaking work of Arthur and Marilouise Kroker
 I shall evaluate the contribution of Virilio"s writ ings by suggggesting that they exist beyond the terms of postm odernism and that they shou ld be conc eived of as a contri bution to the emerging debate over

" hypermodernism " Conseq-uently the article deta ils Virilio''s biogr aphy and the theore tical context of his work be fore outli ning the essential contributions Virilio has made to contempo orary cultural theory. In later sections an appraisal of Virilio's "hypermodernism" tog -ether with a short evalu ation of the controversies surrounding Virilio's work, will be provided before the concl usion.

The World According To Paul Virilio

Born in Paris in 1932 to a Breton mother and an Italian Communist father, Virilio was evacuated in 1939 to the port of Nantes, where he was traumatised by the spectacle of Hitler's Blitzkrieg during World War II. After training at the Ecole des Metiers d' Art in Paris, Virilio became an artist in stained glass and worked alongside Matisse in various churches in the French capital. In 1950, he converted to Christianity in the company of 'worker-priests' and, following military conscription into the colonial army during the Algerian war of independence (1954-1962), Virilio studied phenomenology with Merleau-Ponty at the Sorbonne. Captivated by the military, spatial, and organizational features of urban territory, Virilio's early writings began to appear while he was acting as a self-styled 'urbanist', in Architecture Principe (Virilio and Parent, 1996), the group and review of the same name he established with the architect Claude Parent in 1963. Although Virilio produced numerous short pieces and architectural drawings in the 1960s, his first major work was a photographic and philosophical study of the architecture of war entitled Bunker Archeology (1994a [1975]). The creator of concepts such as 'military space', 'dromology', and the 'aesthetics of disappearance', Virilio's phenomenologically grounded and controversial cultural theory draws on the writings of Husserl, Heidegger, and, above all, Merleau Ponty. 2 After participating in the evenements of May 1968 in Paris, Virilio was nominated Professor by the students at the Ecole Speciale d' Architecture, and he later helped Jacques Derrida and others to found the International College of Philosophy. An untrained architect, Virilio has never felt compelled to restrict his concerns to the spatial arts. Indeed, like his philosopher companions, the late Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari and Jean-Francois Lyotard, Virilio, like his current sympathetic adversary, Jean Baudrillard, has written numerous texts on a variety of cultural topics. Commencing with Speed & Politics: An Essay on Dromology 1986 1977
before moving on to The Aesthetics of Disappearance 1991 -  1980

War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception 1989 - 1984
Politics of the Very Worst
1999a 1996 Polar Inertia 1999 1990 The Information Bomb 2000 1998 and  most recently Strategy of Deception 2000b 1999 the power of Virilio's cultural theory has only recently begun to be felt in the Engl ish-speaking world This situation is probably due in no small part to the fact that despite rece iving several intern ational speaking invitations weekly he rarely lea ves Paris and seldom converses in public outside France. Virilio retired from teaching in 1998. He currently devotes himself to writing and working with private orga niza tions concer ned with housing the homeless in Paries.

The importance ofVirilio's theoretical work stems from his central claim that, in a culture dominated by war, the military-industrial complex is of crucial significance in debates over the creation of the city and the spatial organization of cultural life. In Speed & Politics , for example, Virilio offers a credible 'war model' of the growth of the modern city and the development of human society. Thus, according to Virilio, the fortified city of the feudal period was a stationary and generally unassailable 'war machine' coupled to an attempt to modulate the circulation and the momentum of the movements of the urban masses. Therefore, the fortified city was a political space of habitable inertia, the political configuration, and the physical underpinning of the feudal era. Nevertheless, for Virilio, the essential question is why did the fortified city disappear? His rather unconventional answer is that it did so due to the advent of ever increasingly transportable and accelerated weapons systems. For such innovations 'exposed' the fortified city and transformed siege warfare into a war of movement . Additionally, they undermined the efforts of the authorities to govern the flow of the urban citizenry and therefore heralded the arrival of what Virilio (Virilio and Parent, 1996: xv) calls the 'habitable circulation' of the masses. Unlike Marx, then, Virilio postulates that the transition from feudalism to capitalism was not an economic transformation but a military, spatial, political, and technological metamorphosis. Broadly speaking, where Marx wrote of the materialist conception of history, Virilio writes of the military conception of history.

Virilio's Contribution To Cultural Theory

Virilio's early work focused on the oblique function — a proposed new urban order based on 'the end of the vertical as an axis of elevation, the end of the horizontal as permanent plane, in favour of the oblique axis and the inclined plane' (Virilio and Parent, 1996: ). Such writings also foreshadowed Virilio's military and political critiques of deterritorialization and the revolution in information transmission that surfaced in Bunker Archeology , his as yet untranslated L'Insecurite du territoire (1976) and Speed & Politics . Moreover, it is these themes that make Virilio's current writings of interest to contemporary postmodern cultural theorists like Bauman (1999: 0) and 'global information culture' theorists such as Lash (1999: ).

Virilio's doubts about the political economy of wealth are primarily driven by his 'dromocratic' conception of power. Considering Von Clausewitz's On War (1997 [1832) to be outmoded, Virilio is decisively influenced by Sun Tzu's ancient Chinese text, The Art of War (1993). Debating with himself about war, the 'positive' (Fascist) and 'negative' (anti-Fascist) aspects of Marinetti's artistic theory of Futurism, Virilio suggests that political economy cannot be subsumed under the political economy of wealth, with a comprehension of the management of the economy of the state being its general aim. Indeed, for him, the histories of socio-political institutions such as the military and artistic movements like Futurism show that war and the need for speed, rather than commerce and the urge for wealth, were the foundations of human society. It is important to state that Virilio is not arguing that the political economy of wealth has been superseded by the political economy of speed, rather, he suggests that 'in addition to the political economy of wealth, there has to be a political economy of speed' (Zurbrugg, 2001: forthcoming.) Hence, in Popular Defense & Ecological Struggles (1990 [1978]) and Pure War (Virilio and Lotringer, 1997 [1983]), Virilio developed his dromological investigation to include considerations on pure power — the enforcement of surrender without engagement — and revolutionary resistance — Virilio's case against the militarization of urban space. The 'rationale' of pure war might be encapsulated as the logic of militarized technoscience in the epoch of 'Infowar'. For Virilio, the epoch of Infowar is an era in which unspecified civilian 'enemies' are invoked by the state in order to justify increased spending on the third age of military weaponry and, in particular, in the form of new information and communications technologies such as the Internet. Thus, for Virilio, in the post-Cold War age, the importance of the military-industrial complex — or what he calls the 'military- scientific complex' is not decreasing but increasing (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming. Original emphasis.) For the weapons of the military-scientific complex are not merely responsible for integral accidents like the 1987 world stock market crash, accidents brought about by the failure of automated program trading, but also for the fact that, 'in the very near future' it ' will no longer be war that is the continuation of politics by other means, it will be the integral accident that is the continuation of politics by other means ' (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming. Original emphasis.)

In The Aesthetics of Disappearance and The Lost Dimension (1991b [1984]), Virilio, a devotee of Mandelbrot's (1977) geometry of fractals, argues that cultural theory must take account of interruptions in the rhythm of human consciousness and 'morphological irruptions' in the physical dimension. Using his concept of 'picnolepsy' (frequent interruption) and Einstein's General Relativity Theory, he suggests that modern vision and the contemporary city are both the products of military power and time-based cinematic technologies of disappearance. Furthermore, although there are political and cinematic aspects to our visual consciousness of the cityscape, what is indispensable to them is their ability to designate the technological disappearance of Lyotard's (1984) grand aesthetic and spatial narratives and the advent of micro narratives. In Virilio's terms, Mandelbrot's geometry of fractals reveals the appearance of the 'overexposed' city — as when the morphological irruption between space and time splinters into a countless number of visual interpretations, and 'the crisis of whole dimensions' (Virilio, 1991b [1984]: 9-28). Important here is that Virilio's concerns about the aesthetics of disappearance and the crises of the physical dimension are not exercised by the textual construction of totalizing intellectual 'explanations'. Rather, they are exercised by the strategic positioning of productive interruptions and the creative dynamics of what he, following Churchill, calls the 'tendency' (Virilio, 1989 [1984]: 80). As Virilio maintains in The Lost Dimension, the rule in the overexposed city is the disappearance of aesthetics and whole dimensions into a militarized and cinematographic field of retinal persistence, interruption, and 'technological space-time'. Speaking recently about the overexposed city within the context of the 'totally bogus' court cases surrounding O. J. Simpson and the death of Princess Diana, Virilio suggested that, today, "all cities are overexposed". London, for example, "was overexposed at the time of Diana's burial' while 'New York was overexposed at the time of Clinton's confessions concerning Monica Lewinsky". (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming. Original emphasis.)

In War and Cinema ,Virilio applies the idea of 'substitution' when discussing the different kinds of reality that have appeared since the beginning of time. Bearing a remarkable similarity to Baudrillard's (1983) concept of 'simulation', Virilio's chief concern is with the connection between war, cinematic substitution and what he calls the 'logistics of perception' — the supplying of cinematic images and information on film to the front line. The importance of the concept of the logistics of perception can be seen in the context of 'post' and 'hyper' modern wars like the Persian Gulf War of 1991 and the Kosovo War of 1998-9. For in these kinds of conflicts not only do settled topographical features 'disappear' in the midst of battle but so too does the architecture of war. Indeed, the military high command has only two choices. It can entomb itself in subterranean bunkers with the aim of evading what one of Coppola's helicopters in the film Apocalypse Now announced as 'Death from Above'. Or, alternatively, it can take to the skies with the intention of invading what Virilio has dubbed in the CTHEORY interview, 'orbital space'. Conceptualising a logistics of perception where 'the world disappears in war, and war as a phenomenon disappears from the eyes of the world', Virilio has thus been analysing the relationship between war, substitution, human and synthetic perception since the 1980s, particularly in texts such as L'ecran du desert: chroniques de guerre (1989 [1984]: 66; 1991c). 5 Virilio's interests in war, cinema and the logistics of perception are primarily fuelled by his contention that military perception in warfare is comparable to civilian perception and, specifically, to the art of filmmaking. According to Virilio, therefore, cinematic substitution results in a 'war of images', or, Infowar. Infowar is not traditional war, where the images produced are images of actual battles. Rather, it is a war where the disparity between the images of battles and the actual battles is 'derealized'. To be sure, for Virilio, wars are 'no longer about confrontation' but about movement — the movement of 'electro-magnetic waves'. (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming.) Similar to Baudrillard's (1995) infamous claim that the Gulf War did not take place, Virilio's assertion that war and cinema are virtually indistinguishable is open to dispute. Yet Virilio's stance on the appearance of Infowar is consistent with his view that the only way to monitor cultural developments in the war machine is to adopt a critical theoretical position with regard to the various parallels that exist between war, cinema, and the logistics of perception. It is a view he developed in his trenchant critique of The Vision Machine (1994b [1988]).

In Virilio's universe, therefore, people 'no longer believe their eyes'. For him, 'their faith in perception ' has become 'slave to the faith in the technical sightline ', a situation in which contemporary substitution has reduced the 'visual field' to the 'line of a sighting device' (1994b [1988]: 13. Original emphases.) Viewed from this angle, The Vision Machine is a survey of what I have called 'pure perception' (Armitage, 2000a: 3). For, today, the military-scientific complex has developed ominous technological substitutions and potentialities such as Virtual Reality and the Internet. In Virilio's terms, 'the main aim' of pure perception is ' to register the waning of reality '. The aesthetics of disappearance is a form of aesthetics that is derived from 'the unprecedented limits imposed on subjective vision by the instrumental splitting of modes of perception and representation' (1994b [1988]: 49. Original emphases.) Hence, Virilio conceives of vision machines as the accelerated products of what he calls 'sightless vision' — vision without looking — that 'is itself merely the reproduction of an intense blindness that will become the latest and last form of industrialisation: the industrialisation of the non-gaze (1994b [1988]: 73. Original emphasis.) Virilio further details the far-reaching cultural relationships between vision and remote-controlled technologies in Polar Inertia .
In Polar Inertia , Virilio examines pure perception, speed, and human stasis. In 'Indirect Light', for example, Virilio considers the difference between the video screens recently adopted by the Paris Metro system and 'real' perceptual objects such as mirrors from a theoretical perspective that broadly conforms to what Foucault (1977) called 'surveillance societies' and Deleuze (1995) labelled 'control societies'. In contrast, other articles note the discrepancy between technologically generated inertia and biologically induced human movement. Discussing the introduction of 'wave machines' in Japanese swimming pools, the effacement of a variety of 'local times' around the world and their gradual replacement by a single 'global time', Virilio notes the disparity between 'classical optical communication' and 'electro-optical commutation'. In the era of pure perception, though, Virilio argues that it is not the creation of acceleration and deceleration that becomes important but the creation of 'Polar Inertia'. Here, Virilio proposes that in the early modern era of mobility, in his terms the era of emancipation, inertia did not exist. The idea of polar inertia thus excludes what would have been alternate aspects of the speed equation — simple acceleration or deceleration — in the industrial age. Yet, as Virilio has been arguing since the 1980s, in the post-industrial age of the absolute speed of light, real time has now superseded real space. In such circumstances, the geographical difference between 'here' and 'there' is obliterated by the speed of light as history itself 'crashes into the wall of time'. (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming.) Additionally, in its terminal mode, as exemplified by reclusive billionaires such as the late Howard Hughes, polar inertia becomes a kind of Foucauldian incarceration. Holed up in a single room in the Desert Inn hotel in Las Vegas for fifteen years, endlessly watching Sturges' Ice Station Zebra , Hughes, Virilio's 'technological monk', was not only polar inertia incarnate but, more importantly, the first inhabitant of a 'mass phenomenon'. Equally significantly, for Virilio, this phenomenon has stretched far beyond domestic cinema and TV audiences and on into the global war zone. In fact, according to him, in recent conflicts such as the one in Kosovo, the army now 'watches the battle from the barracks'. As he puts it, "today, the army only occupies the territory once the war is over ." (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming.) At the broadest level, then, Virilio's writings on polar inertia seek to show that large tracts of civilian and military physical geographical spaces no longer have significant human content. Therefore, in The Art of the Motor (1995 [1993]), Virilio turned his attention to the relationship between the spaces of the human body and technology.

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, then, Virilio's cultural theory is concerned with what he calls the third, or, the transplant revolution — the almost total collapse of the distinction between the human body and technology . Intimately linked to the technological enhancement and substitution of body-parts through the miniaturisation of technological objects, the third revolution is a revolution conducted by militarized technoscience against the human body through the promotion of what the Virilio calls 'neo-eugenics'. Such developments range across Virilio's (1995 [1993]: 109-112; Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming) criticisms of the work of Stelarc, the Australian cybernetic performance artist, to his concerns about the eventual fate of the jet-pilots in the Kosovo war. This is because, for Virilio, both Stelarc and the jet-pilot represent much the same thing: "the last man before automation takes command". (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming.) Nevertheless, it should be stressed that Virilio's criticisms of automation are closely connected to the development of his concept of endo-colonization — what takes place when a political power like the state turns against its own people, or, as in the case of militarized technoscience, the human body.

As a result, in Open Sky (1997 [1995]), Politics of the Very Worst , and The Information Bomb, Virilio has elaborated a critique of cyberfeminism that Plant (1997), following Haraway's (1985) 'manifesto for cyborgs', describes as a revolution on the part of cybernetic technology and feminists against the rule of patriarchy. Nonetheless, Virilio has little time for cyberfeminism or 'cybersex'; notions that he criticises, likening cybersex, for example, to the technological replacement of the emotions (Armitage, 2000b: 5). For Virilio, it is imperative to reject cybernetic sexuality, refocus theoretical attention on the human subject, and resist the domination of both men and women by technology. According to Virilio, cyberfeminism is merely one more form of technological fundamentalism — the religion of all those who believe in the absolute power of technology (Virilio and Kittler, 1999.) Having departed from the religious sensibility required in order to understand the contemporary Gods of ubiquity, instantaneity, and immediacy of new information and communications technologies, cyberfeminists, along with numerous other cultural groups, have thus capitulated to the raptures of cyberspace.

Virilio's newest work, though, is Strategy of Deception . Focusing on the Kosovo War, Virilio argues that while war was a failure both for Europe and for NATO it was a success for the Unites States (US). In the world according to Virilio, this is because the US conducted an 'experiment' on Kosovo using the informational and cybernetic tools of the Pentagon's much-hyped 'Revolution in Military Affairs' (RMA). The RMA is thus a revolution that Virilio perceives to be analogous to his conception of 'the information bomb' and cyberwar as well as his contention that the present aim of the US is to seek what its military chiefs term Global Information Dominance (GID).

A Brief Critique Of Virilio

Virilio's cultural theory and numerous activities have courted controversy since the 1960s. When Virilio and Parent built their 'bunker church' — and which has to be seen to be believed — the bishop who consecrated it was, according to Virilio, muttering to himself the following words: 'what a ghastly thing! Amen! What a ghastly thing! Amen!' As Virilio tells the story: 'the priest turned towards the bishop and said: "Monsignor, this is not an exorcism! It is a consecration!"' (Armitage, 2001a: forthcoming.) Religious criticisms of Virilio and Parent's architecture aside, there have also been a number of recent academic critiques of Virilio's ideas concerning the state, technology, and speed. Deleuze and Guattari (1988: 351-423), for instance, attempted what Crogan (1999) calls a problematic effort to 'subsume' Virilio's thought into their own poststructuralist approach to cultural theory. But, as Crogan suggests, Deleuze and Guattari's 'static, ahistorical model' of the state and technology cannot easily be combined with Virilio's writings without undoing 'its own coherency in the process'. In turn, Virilio's The Aesthetics of Disappearance has outraged the neo-Marxian geographer Harvey (1989: 293, 299, and 351; 2000: 88). For Harvey, Virilio's 'response' to what the former recently called the 'theme of time-space compression' 'has been to try and ride the tiger of time-space compression through construction of a language and an imagery that can mirror and hopefully command it'. Harvey places the 'frenetic writings' of Virilio (and Baudrillard) in this category because 'they seem hell-bent on fusing with time-space compression and replicating it in their own flamboyant rhetoric'. Harvey, of course, has 'seen this response before, most specifically in Nietzsche's extraordinary evocations in The Will To Power '. Yet, in The Aesthetics of Disappearance, Virilio's unfolding and wholly intentional reactions to the emergence of the dromocratic condition are actually concerned with 'the importance of interruption, of accident, of things that are stopped as
productive ' (Virilio and Lotringer, 1997 [1983]: 44. Original emphasis.) As Virilio told Lotringer: 'It's entirely different from what Gilles Deleuze does in Milles Plateaux . He progresses by snatches, whereas I handle breaks and absences. The fact of stopping and saying, "let's go somewhere else" is very important for me' (Virilio and Lotringer, 1997 [1983]: 45.) What Virilio's 'frenetic writings' actually substantiate throughout the 1980s are the material and, crucially, the
immaterial consequences of dromological changes in aesthetics, military power, space, cinema, politics, and technology. In an era increasingly eclipsed by the technologically produced disappearance of cultural life, war, matter, and human perception, this is a very significant achievement. In the contemporary era, though, the limitations of Virilio's cultural theory are likely to rest not — as Harvey suggests — with his similarities but with his differences from Nietzsche. As Waite (1996: 381-2. Original emphases.), quoting the American performance artist Laurie Anderson, has argued:

Virilio still desperatelyholds on to a modicum of modernist critique of postmodern military tactics, strategies, and technologies, whereas Nietzsche basically would have been impatient with mere critique, moving quickly to appropriate them for his own use , at least conceptually and rhetorically, as metaphors and techniques of persuasion to preserve power for elites over corpses — 'now that the living outnumber the dead'.

Conclusion
Virilio is, therefore, one of the most important and thought-provoking cultural theorists on the contemporary intellectual battlefield. Just the same, unlike Lyotard's or Baudrillard's postmodernism, Virilio's hypermodernism does not articulate itself as a divergence from modernism and modernity but as a critical analysis of modernism and modernity through a catastrophic perception of technology. It is for these and other reasons that Virilio defines his general position as a critic of the art of technology. Virilio's theoretical position and cultural sensibilities concerning technology thus remain beyond the realm of even critical cultural theory. He does not depend on intellectual 'explanations' but on 'the obvious quality of the implicit' (Virilio and Lotringer, 1997 [1983] On the one hand, therefore, Virilio is a cultural theorist who movingly considers the tendencies of the present period. On the other, he is a cultural theorist who utterly rejects cultural theory.
Hence, it is debatable whether there is much to be gained from cultural theorists attempting to establish the 'truth' or otherwise of Virilio's thought. For Virilio's critical responses to the military, chronopolitics, cinema, art, and technology are actually ethical and emotional responses to the arrival of technological culture. However, it is crucial to remember that Virilio's responses are not the passive responses of the armchair critic. As he emphasises in the CTHEORY interview, '[r]esistance is always possible! But we must engage in resistance first of all by developing the idea of a
technological culture'. Virilio is of course also aware that his work is 'often dismissed in terms of scandalous charges!' As he has noted, in France '[t]here's no tolerance' for 'irony, for wordplay, for argument that takes things to the limit and to excess' (Zurbrugg, 2001: forthcoming.) Hence, to raise the question of Virilio's cultural theory is to raise the question of whether, outside France, his work should be dismissed in terms of scandalous charges, received in terms suffused with praise, or a mixture of both? In short, it is to raise the question of how much tolerance there is in the English-speaking world for irony, for wordplay, and for arguments that take things to excess? Attempting to answer such complex questions will ensure that Virilio's hypermodern cultural theory continues to elicit theoretical argument and social debate for many years to come.

Mahir Pari's Assignment on " Literary Term :- " Eco - Criticism "

 To evaluate my assignment click here



       SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


   Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
   Roll no :- 21
   Topic name :-  Literary Term :- " Eco - Criticism "
   Submitted to :- Department of English
   Paper name :- Literary Theory & Criticism: The 20th Western & Indian Poetics – 2:
   E - mail :- goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com
   Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021


                  Definition of postcolonial

---------> colonialism: The imperialist expansion of Europe into the rest of the world during the last four hundred years in which a dominant imperium or center carried on a relationship of control and influence over its margins or colonies. This relationship tended to extend to social, pedagogical, economic, political, and broadly culturally exchanges often with a hierarchical European settler class and local, educated (compractor) elite class forming layers between the European "mother" nation and the various indigenous peoples who were controlled. Such a system carried within it inherent notions of racial inferiority and exotic otherness.

post-colonialism: Broadly a study of the effects of colonialism on cultures and societies. It is concerned with both how European nations conquered and controlled "Third World" cultures and how these groups have since responded to and resisted those encroachments. Post-colonialism, as both a body of theory and a study of political and cultural change, has gone and continues to go through three broad stages:

an initial awareness of the social, psychological, and cultural inferiority enforced by being in a colonized state
the struggle for ethnic, cultural, and political autonomy
a growing awareness of cultural overlap and hybridity

             According to M h a Ibrahim

---------->.  


Postcolonial Studies. The critical analysis of the history, culture, litera-

ture, and modes of discourse that are specific to the former colonies of Eng-

land, Spain, France, and other European imperial powers. These studies have

focused especially on the Third World countries in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean

islands, and South America. Some scholars, however, extend the scope of such

analyses also to the discourse and cultural productions of such countries as

Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, which achieved independence much

earlier than the Third World countries. Postcolonial studies sometimes en-

compass also aspects of British literature in the eighteenth and nineteenth

centuries, viewed through a perspective that reveals the extent to which the

social and economic life represented in the literature was tacitly underwritten

by colonial exploitation.

An important text in establishing the theory and practice in this recently

developed field of study was Orientalism (1978) by the Palestinian-American

scholar Edward Said, which applied a revised form of Michel Foucault's his-

toricist critique of discourse (see under new historicism) to analyze what he

called "cultural imperialism." This mode of imperialism imposed its power

not by force, but by the effective means of disseminating in subjugated

colonies a Eurocentric discourse that assumed the normality and preeminence

of everything "occidental," correlatively with its representations of the "ori-

ental" as an exotic and inferior other. Since the 1980s, such analysis has been

supplemented by other theoretical principles and procedures, including Al-

thusser's redefinition of the Marxist theory of ideology and the deconstructive

theory of Derrida. The rapidly expanding field of postcolonial studies, as a re-

sult, is not a unified movement with a distinctive methodology. One can,

however, identify several central and recurrent issues:

(1) The rejection of the master-narrative of Western imperialism—in

which the colonial other is not only subordinated and marginalized,but in effect deleted as a cultural agency—and its replacement by a

counter-narrative in which the colonial cultures fight their way back

into a world history written by Europeans. The influential collection of

essays, The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Litera-

tures (1989), ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffins, stresses

what it terms the hybridization of colonial languages and cultures, in

which imperialist importations are superimposed on indigenous tradi-

tions; it also includes a number of postcolonial countertexts to the

hegemonic texts that present a Eurocentric version of colonial history.

(2) An abiding concern with the formation, within Western discursive

practices, of the colonial and postcolonial "subject," as well as of the

categories by means of which this subject conceives itself and per-

ceives the world within which it lives and acts. (See subject under post-

structuralism.) The subaltern has become a standard way to designate

the colonial subject that has been constructed by European discourse

and internalized by colonial peoples who employ this discourse;

"subaltern" is a British word for someone of inferior rank, and com-

bines the Latin terms for "under" (sub) and "other" (alter). A recurrent

topic of debate is how, and to what extent, a subaltern subject, writ-

ing in a European language, can manage to serve as an agent of resis-

tance against, rather than of compliance with, the very discourse that

has created its subordinate identity. See, e.g., Gayatri Chakravorty

Spivak, "Can the Subaltern Speak?" (1988), reprinted in The Postcolo-

nial Studies Reader, listed below.

(3) A major element in the postcolonial agenda is to disestablish Euro-

centric norms of literary and artistic values, and to expand the liter-

ary canon to include colonial and postcolonial writers. In the United

States and Britain, there is an increasingly successful movement to in-

clude, in the standard academic curricula, the brilliant and innova-

tive novels, poems, and plays by such postcolonial writers in the

English language as the Africans Chinua Achebe and Wole Soyinka,

the Caribbean islanders V. S. Naipaul and Derek Walcott, and the au-

thors from the Indian subcontinent G. V. Desani and Salman

Rushdie. See Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture (1994); and for a

survey of the large and growing body of literature in English by post-

colonial writers throughout the world, see Martin Coyle and others,

Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism (1990), pages 1113-1236.

A comprehensive anthology is The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (1995), ed.

Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. Refer also to Franz Fanon,

The Wretched of the Earth (trans., 1966); Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakravorti

Spivak, Selected Subaltern Studies (1988); Trinh T. Minh-ha, Woman, Native,

Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism (1989); Terry Eagleton, Fredric

Jameson, and Edward W. Said, Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature (1990);

Christopher L. Miller, Theories of Africans: Francophone Literature and Anthro-

pology in Africa (1990); Edward W. Said, Culture and Imperialism (1993).

                   History of postcolonial


------------> Since the 1980s, numerous novelists, dramatists, and poets have been marketed as postcolonial writers. But what is postcolonial literature? In the broadest terms, this category includes works that have a relationship to the subjugating forces of imperialism and colonial expansion. In short, postcolonial literature is that which has arisen primarily since the end of World War II from regions of the world undergoing decolonization. Works from such regions in the 20th and 21st centuries, such as the Indian subcontinent, Nigeria, South Africa, and numerous parts of the Caribbean, for example, might be described as postcolonial.


           The rise of postcolonial theory

----------> In order to understand the rising attention to postcolonial fiction, a basic understanding of postcolonial theory is necessary. Keep in mind, this is a very short history and is by no means all-inclusive! If you’re interested in postcolonial theory, you might start with some of the writers we’re about to discuss before moving onto your own explorations of the topic.

In 1961, Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth was published in French. Arising out of the Algerian struggle for independence from France, the text examined possibilities for anti-colonial violence in the region and elsewhere. Fanon was a Martinique-born intellectual who was also a member of the Algerian National Liberation Front, and his writings have inspired numerous people across the globe in struggles for freedom from oppression and racially motivated violence. If you’re particularly interested in Fanon as a collector, you might seek out first editions of Fanon’s work. Grove Press published the first U.S. edition of The Wretched of the Earth in 1963, with a translated forward by Jean-Paul Sartre.

By 1979, Edward Said had written Orientalism, a text examining the relationship between those in the West and the “Other” in the East. This work has become a staple in postcolonial courses, and it helped to expand the field over the last few decades. Said was a Palestinian-American scholar who taught at Columbia University for the majority of his academic career. Other important early thinkers in postcolonial theory, just to name a couple, include Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Homi Bhabha.


         Early Postcolonial writer's of Imaginative literature

--------> While the field of postcolonial studies only began taking shape in the late 1970s and early 1980s, numerous fiction writers began publishing works in the decades immediately following World War II. One of the most significant postcolonial novels to emerge in this period was Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart (1958). This novel now graces many Anglophone fiction course syllabi, which isn’t a surprise given its enormous popularity and importance when it first was published.

Published in the late 1950s, Achebe wrote the book at the end of the British colonial period in Nigeria but depicted an earlier moment in Nigerian history. The novel tells the story of Okonkwo, an Igbo village leader in the late 19th century who must witness the tragic demise of his culture at the hands of colonialism. Nigeria remained a British colony until 1960. If you’re interested in adding one of Achebe’s works to your collection, you might look for a first U.K. edition of Things Fall Apart, published by William Heinemann Ltd. in 1958, or a first American edition published a year later in New York by McDowell Obolensky.


Even before Chinua Achebe published Things Fall Apart, Nadine Gordimer had already written one book and several short-story collections, and she was in the process of publishing her second novel. A South African writer of Eastern European origin, Gordimer didn’t personally experience the racial discrimination and violence that arose from decolonization and the institution of apartheid, but she nonetheless spent her career advocating for equal rights in her country. Some of her most notable works that deal with postcolonial politics and the stark harms of apartheid include The Conservationist (1974), Burger’s Daughter (1979), and July’s People (1981). A signed copy of one of Gordimer’s works would make a fantastic edition to any postcolonial literature collection.

Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North (1966) is another significant and early work of postcolonial fiction. A bildungsroman of sorts, Salih’s novel follows an unnamed protagonist as he returns to his Sudanese village after years of education abroad in England only to learn of the devastating effects of imperialism. The novel was originally written in Arabic, and it was published in English for the first time in 1969.

When it comes to plays, Derek Walcott’s Dream on Monkey Mountain (1970) helped to set the world stage for postcolonial dramatists. A writer from Saint Lucia, Walcott’s works frequently depict the colonial harms of the West Indies. Indeed, his plays, as well as his poems, encourage his readers to question the history and politics of the Caribbean, and its role as a postcolonial site through which we might renegotiate remedies for imperialism.

Stay tuned for Part II of our brief history of postcolonial literatue, in which we'll explore contemporary writers who detail the postcolonial condition.


               Critical approaches

--------> Amongst prominent theorists are Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, Frantz Fanon, Bill Ashcroft, NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong'o, Chinua Achebe, Leela Gandhi, Gareth Griffiths, Abiola Irele, John McLeod, Hamid Dabashi, Helen Tiffin, Khal Torabully, and Robert Young. Another important theorist is Harvard University professor Homi K Bhabha, (1949 – ). He is one of the most important figures in contemporary post-colonial studies, and has developed a number of the field's neologisms and key concepts, such as hybridity, mimicry, difference, and ambivalence.

Frantz Omar Fanon (1925 – 1961) was a Martinique-born Afro-Caribbean psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and writer whose works are influential in the fields of post-colonial studies, critical theory, and Marxism.[3] As an intellectual, Fanon was a political radical, Pan-Africanist, and a Marxist humanist concerned with the psychopathology of colonization,[4] and the human, social, and cultural consequences of decolonization.

Post-colonial literary theory re-examines colonial literature, especially concentrating upon the social discourse, between the colonizer and the colonized, that shaped and produced the literature. In Orientalism (1978), Edward Saïd analyzed the fiction of Honoré de Balzac, Charles Baudelaire, and Lautréamont (Isidore-Lucien Ducasse), and explored how they were influenced, and how they helped to shape the societal fantasy of European racial superiority. Post-colonial fiction writers deal with the traditional colonial discourse, either by modifying or by subverting it, or both.

The “anti-conquest narrative” recasts the indigenous inhabitants of colonized countries as victims rather than foes of the colonisers.[8] This depicts the colonised people in a more human light but risks absolving colonisers of responsibility for addressing the effects of colonisation by assuming that native inhabitants were "doomed" to their fate.

Mary Pratt, however, proposes a completely different theorization of "anti-conquest" than the ideas discussed here, that can be traced to Edward Said. Instead of referring to how natives resist colonization or are victims of it, Pratt analyzes European literatures in which a European narrates their adventures and struggles to survive in the land of the non-European Other.[9] The anti-conquest is a function of how the narrator writes him or her self out of being responsible for or an agent, direct or indirect, of colonization and colonialism. This different notion of anti-conquest is used to analyze the ways in which colonialism and colonization are legitimized nonetheless through entertaining stories of survival and adventure. Pratt created this unique notion in association with concepts of contact zone and transculturation, which have been very well received in Latin America social and human science circles.[citation needed] Négritude is a literary and ideological philosophy, developed by francophone African intellectuals, writers, and politicians in France during the 1930s. Its initiators included Martinican poet Aimé Césaire, Léopold Sédar Senghor (a future President of Senegal), and Léon Damas of French Guiana. Négritude intellectuals disapproved of French colonialism and claimed that the best strategy to oppose it was to encourage a common racial identity for native Africans worldwide.

                  Back to Africa movement
--------> Marcus Mosiah Garvey, Jr. (1887 – 1940),[10] was a Jamaican political leader, publisher, journalist, entrepreneur, and orator who was a proponent of the Pan-Africanism movement, to which end he founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League (UNIA-ACL).He also founded the Black Star Line, a shipping and passenger line which promoted the return of the African diaspora to their ancestral lands.

Prior to the 20th century, leaders such as Prince Hall, Martin Delany, Edward Wilmot Blyden, and Henry Highland Garnet advocated the involvement of the African diaspora in African affairs. Garvey was unique in advancing a Pan-African philosophy to inspire a global mass movement and economic empowerment focusing on Africa known as Garveyism.Promoted by the UNIA as a movement of African Redemption, Garveyism would eventually inspire others, ranging from the Nation of Islam to the Rastafari movement (some sects of which proclaim Garvey as a prophet).


                    Postcolonial feminist literature

--------->Postcolonial feminism is a form of feminism that developed as a response to the fact that feminism seemed to focus solely on the experiences of women in Western cultures. Postcolonial feminism seeks to account for the way that racism and the long-lasting political, economic, and cultural effects of colonialism affect non-white, non-Western women in the postcolonial world.

                    South Africa

-------->. Elleke Boehmer (cf. Cullhed, 2006: 79) writes, “Nationalism, like patriarchy, favours singleness—one identity, one growth pattern, one birth and blood for all ... [and] will promote specifically unitary or ‘one-eyed’ forms of consciousness.” The first problem any student of South African literature is confronted with, is the diversity of the literary systems. Gerrit Olivier notes, "While it is not unusual to hear academics and politicians talk about a 'South African literature', the situation at ground level is characterised by diversity and even fragmentation". Robert Mossman adds that "One of the enduring and saddest legacies of the apartheid system may be that no one – White, Black, Coloured (meaning of mixed-race in South Africa), or Asian – can ever speak as a "South African." The problem, however, pre-dates Apartheid significantly, as South Africa is a country made up of communities that have always been linguistically and culturally diverse. These cultures have all retained autonomy to some extent, making a compilation such as the controversial Southern African Literatures by Michael Chapman, difficult. Chapman raises the question:

[W]hose language, culture, or story can be said to have authority in South Africa when the end of apartheid has raised challenging questions as to what it is to be a South African, what it is to live in a new South Africa, whether South Africa is a nation, and, if so, what its mythos is, what requires to be forgotten and what remembered as we scour the past in order to understand the present and seek a path forward into an unknown future.

South Africa has 11 national languages: Afrikaans, English, Zulu, Xhosa, Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, Venda, SiSwati, Tsonga, and Ndebele. Any definitive literary history of South Africa should, it could be argued, discuss literature produced in all eleven languages. But the only literature ever to adopt characteristics that can be said to be "national" is Afrikaans. Olivier argues: "Of all the literatures in South Africa, Afrikaans literature has been the only one to have become a national literature in the sense that it developed a clear image of itself as a separate entity, and that by way of institutional entrenchment through teaching, distribution, a review culture, journals, etc. it could ensure the continuation of that concept." Part of the problem is that English literature has been seen within the greater context of English writing in the world, and has, because of English's global position as lingua franca, not been seen as autonomous or indigenous to South Africa – in Olivier’s words: "English literature in South Africa continues to be a sort of extension of British or international English literature." The African languages, on the other hand, are spoken across the borders of Southern Africa - for example, Tswana is spoken in Botswana, and Tsonga in Zimbabwe, and Sotho in Lesotho. South Africa's borders were drawn up by the British Empire and, as with all other colonies, these borders were drawn without regard for the people living within them. Therefore: in a history of South African literature, do we include all Tswana writers, or only the ones with South African citizenship? Chapman bypasses this problem by including "Southern" African literatures. The second problem with the African languages is accessibility, because since the African languages are regional languages, none of them can claim the readership on a national scale comparable to Afrikaans and English. Sotho, for instance, while transgressing the national borders of the RSA, is on the other hand mainly spoken in the Free State, and bears a great amount of relation to the language of Natal for example, Zulu. So the language cannot claim a national readership, while on the other hand being "international" in the sense that it transgresses the national borders.

Olivier argues that "There is no obvious reason why it should be unhealthy or abnormal for different literatures to co-exist in one country, each possessing its own infrastructure and allowing theoreticians to develop impressive theories about polysystems". Yet political idealism proposing a unified "South Africa" (a remnant of the colonial British approach) has seeped into literary discourse and demands a unified national literature, which does not exist and has to be fabricated. It is unrealistic to ever think of South Africa and South African literature as homogenous, now or in the near or distant future, since the only reason it is a country at all is the interference of European colonial powers. This is not a racial issue, but rather has to do with culture, heritage and tradition (and indeed the constitution celebrates diversity). Rather, it seems more sensible to discuss South African literature as literature produced within the national borders by the different cultures and language groups inhabiting these borders. Otherwise the danger is emphasising one literary system at the expense of another, and more often than not, the beneficiary is English, with the African languages being ignored. The distinction "black" and "white" literature is further a remnant of colonialism that should be replaced by drawing distinctions between literary systems based on language affiliation rather than race.


---------> The first texts produced by black authors were often inspired by missionaries and frequently deal with African history, in particular the history of kings such as Chaka. Modern South African writing in the African languages tends to play at writing realistically, at providing a mirror to society, and depicts the conflicts between rural and urban settings, between traditional and modern norms, racial conflicts and most recently, the problem of AIDS.

In the first half of the 20th century, epics largely dominated black writing: historical novels, such as Sol T. Plaatje’s Mhudi: An Epic of South African Native Life a Hundred Years Ago (1930), Thomas Mofolo’s Chaka (trans. 1925), and epic plays including those of H. I. E. Dhlomo, or heroic epic poetry such as the work of Mazizi Kunene. These texts “evince black African patriarchy in its traditional form, with men in authority, often as warriors or kings, and women as background figures of dependency, and/or mothers of the nation” (Cullhed, 2006: 21). Female literature in the African languages is severely limited because of the strong influence of patriarchy, but over the last decade or two society has changed much and it can be expected that more female voices will emerge.

The following are notable white South African writers in English: Athol Fugard, Nadine Gordimer, J. M. Coetzee, and Wilbur Smith. Andr̩ Brink has written in both Afrikaans and English while Breyten Breytenbach writes primarily in Afrikaans, though many of their works have been translated into English. Dalene Matthee's (1938 Р2005) is another Afrikaner, best known for her four Forest Novels, written in and around the Knysna Forest, including Fiela se Kind (1985) (Fiela's Child).[35] Her books have been translated into fourteen languages, including English, French, and German.[36] and over a million copies have been sold worldwide.

                The Americas
                            Caribbean Islands
Maryse Condé (1937 – ) is a French (Guadeloupean) author of historical fiction, best known for her novel Segu (1984–1985).


                      West Indies

---------> An exemplar post-colonial novel is Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) by Jean Rhys (1890 – 1979), a mid-twentieth century novelist who was born and grew up in the Caribbean island of Dominica, though she was mainly resident in England from the age of 16. This novel is based on Jane Eyre (1847), by Charlotte Brontë, re-told from the perspective of a subaltern protagonist, Antoinette Conway. It is the story of Antoinette Cosway, a white Creole heiress, from the time of her youth in Jamaica, to her unhappy marriage to a certain English gentleman—he is never named by the author. He renames her to a prosaic Bertha, declares her mad, and requires her to relocate to England. Caught in an oppressive patriarchal society in which she fully belongs neither to the white Europeans nor the black Jamaicans, Cosway is Rhys' version of Brontë's devilish "madwoman in the attic." As with many postcolonial works, the novel deals with the themes of racial inequality and the harshness of displacement and assimilation. It is also concerned with power relations between men and women



----------> The term "West Indies" first began to achieve wide currency in the 1950s, when writers such as Samuel Selvon, John Hearne, Edgar Mittelholzer, V.S. Naipaul, and George Lamming began to be published in the United Kingdom.[39] A sense of a single literature developing across the islands was also encouraged in the 1940s by the BBC radio programme Caribbean Voices, which featured stories and poems written by West Indian authors, recorded in London under the direction of producer Henry Swanzy, and broadcast back to the islands.[40] Magazines such as Kyk-Over-Al in Guyana, Bim in Barbados, and Focus in Jamaica, which published work by writers from across the region, also encouraged links and helped build an audience.[41]

Many—perhaps most—West Indian writers have found it necessary to leave their home territories and base themselves in the United Kingdom, the United States, or Canada in order to make a living from their work—in some cases spending the greater parts of their careers away from the territories of their birth. Critics in their adopted territories might argue that, for instance, V. S. Naipaul ought to be considered a British writer instead of a Trinidadian writer, or Jamaica Kincaid and Paule Marshall American writers, but most West Indian readers and critics still consider these writers "West Indian".

West Indian literature ranges over subjects and themes as wide as those of any other "national" literature, but in general many West Indian writers share a special concern with questions of identity, ethnicity, and language that rise out of the Caribbean historical experience.

One unique and pervasive characteristic of Caribbean literature is the use of "dialect" forms of the national language, often termed creole. The various local variations in the language adopted from the colonial powers such as Britain, Spain, Portugal, France and the Netherlands, have been modified over the years within each country and each has developed a blend that is unique to their country. Many Caribbean authors in their writing switch liberally between the local variation - now commonly termed nation language - and the standard form of the language.[42] Two West Indian writers have won the Nobel Prize for Literature: Derek Walcott (1992), born in St. Lucia, resident mostly in Trinidad during the 1960s and '70s, and partly in the United States since then; and V. S. Naipaul, born in Trinidad and resident in the United Kingdom since the 1950. (Saint-John Perse, who won the Nobel Prize in 1960, was born in the French territory of Guadeloupe.)

Other notable names in (anglophone) Caribbean literature have included Earl Lovelace, Austin Clarke, Claude McKay, Orlando Patterson, Andrew Salkey, Edward Kamau Brathwaite (who was born in Barbados and has lived in Ghana and Jamaica), Linton Kwesi Johnson, and Michelle Cliff, to name only a few. In more recent times, a number of literary voices have emerged from the Caribbean as well as the Caribbean diaspora, including Kittitian Caryl Phillips (who has lived in the UK since one month of age), Edwidge Danticat, a Haitian immigrant to the United States; Anthony Kellman from Barbados, who divides his time between Barbados and the United States; Andrea Levy of the United Kingdom, Jamaicans Colin Channer and Marlon James, the author of the Man Booker Prize-winning novel A Brief History of Seven Killings (2014) (as well as John Crow's Devil, The Book of Night Women, the unpublished screenplay "Dead Men", and the short story "Under Cover of Darkness"), Antiguan Marie-Elena John, and Lasana M. Sekou from St. Maarten/St. Martin.

Earl Lovelace (1935 – ) is an award-winning Trinidadian novelist, journalist, playwright, and short story writer. He is particularly recognized for his descriptive, dramatic fiction on Trinidadian culture: "Using Trinidadian dialect patterns and standard English, he probes the paradoxes often inherent in social change as well as the clash between rural and urban cultures."[43] As Bernardine Evaristo notes, "Lovelace is unusual among celebrated Caribbean writers in that he has always lived in Trinidad. Most writers leave to find support for their literary endeavours elsewhere and this, arguably, shapes the literature, especially after long periods of exile. But Lovelace's fiction is deeply embedded in Trinidadian society and is written from the perspective of one whose ties to his homeland have never been broken


                       United States

------------>. American David Henry Hwang's play M. Butterfly addresses the Western perspective on China and the French as well as the American perspectives on Vietnam during the Vietnam War. It was inspired by Giacomo Puccini's opera Madama Butterfly.

Maxine Hong Kingston (1940– ) is a Chinese American author who has written three novels and several works of non-fiction about the experiences of Chinese immigrants living in the United States.

Bharati Mukherjee although of East Indian ancestry has gone on record that she considers herself an American writer, and not an Indian expatriate writer. In a 1989 interview with Amanda Meer, Mukherjee said: "I totally consider myself an American writer, and that has been my big battle: to get to realize that my roots as a writer are no longer, if they ever were, among Indian writers, but that I am writing about the territory about the feelings, of a new kind of pioneer here in America. I’m the first among Asian immigrants to be making this distinction between immigrant writing and expatriate writing. Most Indian writers prior to this, have still thought of themselves as Indians, and their literary inspiration, has come from India. India has been the source, and home. Whereas I’m saying, those are wonderful roots, but now my roots are here and my emotions are here in North America."

Jhumpa Lahiri (1967 –) is an Indian-American author. Lahiri's debut short story collection Interpreter of Maladies (1999) won the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, and her first novel, The Namesake (2003), was adapted into the popular film of the same name.


             African-American literature

------------>. Throughout American history, African Americans have been discriminated against and subject to racist attitudes. This experience inspired some Black writers, at least during the early years of African-American literature, to prove they were the equals of European-American authors. As Henry Louis Gates, Jr, has said, "it is fair to describe the subtext of the history of black letters as this urge to refute the claim that because blacks had no written traditions they were bearers of an inferior culture."

By refuting the claims of the dominant culture, African-American writers were also attempting to subvert the literary and power traditions of the United States. Some scholars assert that writing has traditionally been seen as "something defined by the dominant culture as a white male activity." This means that, in American society, literary acceptance has traditionally been intimately tied in with the very power dynamics which perpetrated such evils as racial discrimination. By borrowing from and incorporating the non-written oral traditions and folk life of the African diaspora, African-American literature broke "the mystique of connection between literary authority and patriarchal power." In producing their own literature, African Americans were able to establish their own literary traditions devoid of the white intellectual filter. This view of African-American literature as a tool in the struggle for Black political and cultural liberation has been stated for decades, perhaps most famously by W. E. B. Du Bois.


                        Native American Renaissance

---------------> Native American Renaissance is a term originally coined by critic Kenneth Lincoln in the 1983 book Native American Renaissance to categorise the significant increase in production of literary works by Native Americans in the United States in the late 1960s onwards. A. Robert Lee and Alan Velie note that the book's title "quickly gained currency as a term to describe the efflorescence on literary works that followed the publication of N. Scott Momaday's House Made of Dawn in 1968". Momaday's novel garnered critical acclaim, including the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1969.

Conclusion

          --------------> here I conclude this literary term postcolonial with his definition and brief history and some colonize Nations and the literature  and their major writers and their works I have written it.

Mahir pari's Assignment on ' Discuss the portrait of woman characters in "Oliver twist"


To evaluate my assignment click here


SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


      Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
      Roll no :- 21
      Topic name :- Discuss the portrait of woman characters in
"Oliver Twist"  
      Submitted to :- Department of English
      Paper name :- The Victorian Literature
      E - mail :- goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com
      Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021



                Brief introduction about author :- Charles Dickens

Charles John Huffam Dickens  was an English writer and social critic. He created some of the world's best-known fictional characters and is regarded by many as the greatest novelist of the Victorian era. His works enjoyed unprecedented popularity during his lifetime, and by the 20th century critics and scholars had recognised him as a literary genius. His novels and short stories enjoy lasting popularity.


Born :-  Charles John Huffam Dickens,7 February 1812Landport, Hampshire, England.
Died:-   9 June 1870 (aged 58)Higham, Kent, England,Resting place.Poets' Corner,
        Westminster Abbey
Occupation :- Writer
Nationality :- British
Notable works :- The Pickwick Papers,
               Oliver Twist,
               Nicholas Nickleby,
               A Christmas Carol,
               David Copperfield,
               Bleak House,
               Little Dorrit,
              A Tale of TwoCities,
               Great Expectations,


  Brief history of novel :-
                Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in 1830s England. His mother, whose name no one knows, is found on the street and dies just after Oliver’s birth. Oliver spends the first nine years of his life in a badly run home for young orphans and then is transferred to a workhouse for adults. After the other boys bully Oliver into asking for more gruel at the end of a meal, Mr. Bumble, the parish beadle, offers five pounds to anyone who will take the boy away from the workhouse. Oliver narrowly escapes being apprenticed to a brutish chimney sweep and is eventually apprenticed to a local undertaker, Mr. Sowerberry. When the undertaker’s other apprentice, Noah Claypole, makes disparaging comments about Oliver’s mother, Oliver attacks him and incurs the Sowerberrys’ wrath. Desperate, Oliver runs away at dawn and travels toward London.
Outside London, Oliver, starved and exhausted, meets Jack Dawkins, a boy his own age. Jack offers him shelter in the London house of his benefactor, Fagin . It turns out that Fagin is a career criminal who trains orphan boys to pick pockets for him. After a few days of training, Oliver is sent on a pickpocketing mission with two other boys. When he sees them swipe a handkerchief from an elderly gentleman, Oliver is horrified and runs off. He is caught but narrowly escapes being convicted of the theft. Mr. Brownlow, the man whose handkerchief was stolen, takes the feverish Oliver to his home and nurses him back to health. Mr. Brownlow is struck by Oliver’s resemblance to a portrait of a young woman that hangs in his house. Oliver thrives in Mr. Brownlow’s home, but two young adults in Fagin’s gang, Bill Sikes and his lover Nancy, capture Oliver and return him to Fagin.
Fagin sends Oliver to assist Sikes in a burglary. Oliver is shot by a servant of the house and, after Sikes escapes, is taken in by the women who live there, Mrs. Maylie and her beautiful adopted niece Rose. They grow fond of Oliver, and he spends an idyllic summer with them in the countryside. But Fagin and a mysterious man named Monks are set on recapturing Oliver. Meanwhile, it is revealed that Oliver’s mother left behind a gold locket when she died. Monks obtains and destroys that locket. When the Maylies come to London, Nancy meets secretly with Rose and informs her of Fagin’s designs, but a member of Fagin’s gang overhears the conversation. When word of Nancy’s disclosure reaches Sikes, he brutally murders Nancy and flees London. Pursued by his guilty conscience and an angry mob, he inadvertently hangs himself while trying to escape.
Mr. Brownlow, with whom the Maylies have reunited Oliver, confronts Monks and wrings the truth about Oliver’s parentage from him. It is revealed that Monks is Oliver’s half brother. Their father, Mr. Leeford, was unhappily married to a wealthy woman and had an affair with Oliver’s mother, Agnes Fleming. Monks has been pursuing Oliver all along in the hopes of ensuring that his half-brother is deprived of his share of the family inheritance. Mr. Brownlow forces Monks to sign over Oliver’s share to Oliver. Moreover, it is discovered that Rose is Agnes’s younger sister, hence Oliver’s aunt. Fagin is hung for his crimes. Finally, Mr. Brownlow adopts Oliver, and they and the Maylies retire to a blissful existence in the countryside.









           Women character in Oliver Twist



1.)  Nancy


2.)  Rose maylie


3.)  Agen's Fleming


4.)  Mrs. Maylie


5.)  Mrs. Corney


6.)  Mrs. Bedwin


7.)  Monkes's mother


8.)  Mrs. Sowerberry


9.)  Mrs.Mann        
       
             



                             Nancy

Nancy is a fictional character in the novel Oliver Twist and its numerous theatre , television and motion picture adaptations. She is a member of Fagin's gang and the lover , and eventual victim, of Bill Sikes .

Though it is never explicitly stated in the novel, it is strongly implied that Nancy is a prostitute as well as a thief. Dickens expressly asserted this in his preface to the novel's 1841 edition ("the boys are pickpockets, and the girl is a prostitute").
Despite her criminality , Nancy is portrayed as a
sympathetic figure, whose concern for Oliver overcomes her loyalty to Sikes and Fagin. By the climax of the novel she is emaciated with sickness and worry, and filled with guilt about the life she is leading.

                            Background
Nancy was tainted and played at a young age by
Fagin , the receiver of stolen goods who persuades downtrodden youths to do his bidding. Her exact age is not mentioned in the book, although she says she has been a thief for 12 years (and began working for Fagin when she was half Oliver's age). From this it can be deduced that she is probably around seventeen. She is typically depicted in her teens or mid 20s in film versions of the novel. She apparently looks older than her years, as she tells Rose Maylie "I am younger than you would think, to look at me, but I am well used to it."
Nancy is one of the members of Fagin's gang that few, if any, know about in central London, since she has recently moved from the suburbs — something referred to by Sikes when he and Fagin, concerned that Oliver might inform on them, are trying to convince her to attend his impending trial after he is mistakenly arrested for pickpocketing ("No one around here knows anything about you"). Her excuse for not attending is that she does not wish anyone to know about her; nevertheless, she winds up attending it, presumably after having been physically threatened by Sikes.


                          Description
In the novel she drinks heavily. She is described thus when she first appears:
“ A couple of young ladies called to see the young gentlemen; one of whom was named Bet, and the other Nancy. They wore a good deal of hair, not very neatly turned up behind, and were rather untidy about the shoes and stockings. They were not exactly pretty, perhaps; but they had a great deal of colour in their faces, and looked quite stout and hearty." ”
In the original illustrations by George Cruikshank , Nancy is depicted as stout and fleshy, with a round, bulbous face.
By the end of the novel Nancy has dramatically lost weight through anxiety. She is described as "so pale and reduced with watching and privation, that there would have been considerable difficulty in recognising her as the same Nancy who has already figured in this tale."
In the preface Dickens says in writing dialogue for Nancy, he deliberately avoided using the crude language that would have been used by a real person like Nancy:
“ No less consulting my own taste, than the manners of the age, I endeavoured, while I painted it in all its fallen and degraded aspect, to banish from the lips of the lowest character I introduced, any expression that could by possibility offend; and rather to lead to the unavoidable inference that its existence was of the most debased and vicious kind, than to prove it elaborately by words and deeds. In the case of the girl, in particular, I kept this intention constantly in view.  ”
Instead Nancy and her friend Bet are introduced using faux-genteel terminology, portrayed as if seen though Oliver's innocent eyes, but recognisably ironic to the reader. Bet's brash refusal to get something for Fagin is described as "a polite and delicate evasion of the request" showing "the young lady to have been possessed of natural good-breeding." [5] Nancy's visit to the magistrates is described in similar language. Only later, when Nancy speaks to Rose, does she explicitly describe herself as degraded and corrupted. Their criminal enterprises are spoken of in euphemisms, creating for the reader a "game of guessing the crime".

                       Relationship to Oliver

Nancy, who is fiercely protective of Oliver and harbors a great deal of motherly affection and pity for him, tries to prevent him from being kidnapped a second time, after Oliver has finally managed to find safety in the household of the Maylie family, whom Sikes tried unsuccessfully to rob. She gives Rose Maylie and Mr. Brownlow , Oliver's benefactor, information about Oliver's evil half-brother Monks , who is in league with Fagin. However, she has managed to keep Bill's name out of it. But Fagin has sent a spy (Noah) out after her, and when the spy reports on what he has heard and seen, Fagin, furious at what she has done, tells Sikes about her actions. However, he twists the story just enough to make it sound as if she informed on him, knowing that this will probably result in her being murdered and thus silenced. It is her murder and the subsequent search for Sikes, her killer, that helps bring down Fagin's gang.
Nancy commits one of the most noble acts of kindness in the story when she ultimately defies Bill, in order to help Oliver to a better life, and she is subsequently martyred for it . Her character represented Dickens' view that a person, however tainted by society, could still retain a sense of good and redeem for past crimes. One of the main reasons Dickens puts Nancy in Oliver Twist is so that she can be contrasted with the pure, gentle Rose Maylie .

                            Role of the character

Dickens was criticized for using a character that was a thief. Dickens, however, defended his decision in the Preface to the story when it appeared in novel-form, explaining that it was his intention to show criminals, however petty, in "all their deformity", and that he had thought that dressing Nancy in anything other than "a cheap shawl" would make her seem more fanciful than real as a character.
Nancy is one of literature's earliest examples of the
stock character of the “ tart with a heart ”—the stereotypical character of a tragic or fallen woman who makes her way through life through crime but is still a good and compassionate person.

                               Rose Maylie

Rose Fleming Maylie is a character in Charles Dickens ' novel Oliver Twist, who is eventually discovered to be Oliver's maternal aunt. Though she plays a significant role in the novel, she is often omitted from dramatisations of the story.

                               Role
Rose is portrayed as pure, innocent and beautiful. Seventeen years old at the time of the novel's events, she is set up as a dramatic foil to Nancy , who is around the same age and sees her own degradation in contrast to Rose.

                               Biography

Rose is an orphan whose original surname was Fleming. She is raised from childhood by Mrs. Maylie, who adopted her from a poor family who were looking after her. She refers to Rose as her niece.  Rose is haunted by the thought that she may be illegitimate, and so she rejects the suit of Mrs. Maylie's son Harry for fear that marriage to her may harm his career in the church.
Bill Sikes and Toby Crackit, two thieves, break into the Maylies' house, accompanied by Oliver, who they use to get access, as he is small enough to climb through a window. Oliver is shot and wounded by Giles, the butler of the Maylies.
Later, Rose learns about Oliver's plight from Nancy. She offers to help Nancy escape from Sikes, but Nancy refuses to leave him. Rose teams up with Mr. Brownlow to rescue Oliver. It is later revealed that she is Oliver's aunt.  Her sister Agnes Fleming was Oliver's mother. Like Oliver, she was a victim of
Monks ' plotting.
Towards the end of the novel Rose becomes seriously ill and is apparently on the point of death. Harry hastens to her side and declares his love for her. She recovers and the couple are married.

                Notable portrayals

Rose Maylie is completely omitted from the musical
Oliver! and the film thereof. She is also missing from the 1948 and 2005 film versions of the novel. Often Rose's familial relationships differ from those of the original novel, with Mr. Brownlow (with whom she had no connection before bonding over their acquaintances with Oliver in the novel) occasionally appearing as her uncle or adopted guardian.

                 Minor character of Oliver Twice
                               Agnes Fleming


Oliver’s mother. After falling in love with and becoming pregnant by Mr. Leeford, she chooses to die anonymously in a workhouse rather than stain her family’s reputation. A retired naval officer’s daughter, she was a beautiful, loving woman. Oliver’s face closely resembles hers.

                                   Mrs. Maylie
A kind, wealthy older woman, the mother of Harry Maylie and adoptive “aunt” of Rose.

                                   Mrs. Corney

The matron of the workhouse where Oliver is born. Mrs. Corney is hypocritical, callous, and materialistic. After she marries Mr. Bumble, she hounds him mercilessly.

                                  Mrs.Bedwin
Mr. Brownlow’s kindhearted housekeeper. Mrs. Bedwin is unwilling to believe Mr. Bumble’s negative report of Oliver’s character.
                             
                             
                                  Monks's mother
An heiress who lived a decadent life and alienated her husband, Mr. Leeford. Monks’s mother destroyed Mr. Leeford’s will, which left part of his property to Oliver. Much of Monks’s nastiness is presumably inherited from her.

                                 Mrs.Sowerberry
Sowerberry’s wife. Mrs. Sowerberry is a mean, judgmental woman who henpecks her husband.

                                 Mrs.Mann
The superintendent of the juvenile workhouse where Oliver is raised. Mrs. Mann physically abuses and half-starves the children in her care.

             Conclusion
                        :- in that way we can see it how the women character are portrait in Oliver Twist and how to play Vital role in this novel.

Mahir pari's Assignment on " Write a not on science versus nature in "Frankenstein"


     

To evaluate my assignment click here

SMT S.B.Gardi Department of English M.K.Bhavnagar University.


   Name :- Goswami Mahir Pari C.
   Roll no :- 21
   Topic name :-  Write a not on
                  Science Versus    
                  nature in
                  Frankenstein
   Submitted to :- Department of
                   English
   Papername :-The Romantic Literature
   E-mail:-goswamimahirpari786@gmail.com  Enrollment no :- 20691084201180021

                       

                   Nature vs. Science


 Throughout the novel Victor constantly seeks solace through nature immediatel after multiple traumatic deaths of his famiily member The serene beauty of the natural scenery he vesets often diminishes his feeling's of sadness worry and guiilt and proovides him with a somewhat restor
sense of hope in the world This portrayal of nature as a source of comfort recurs commonly in the genre of Romanticism
In contrasted the novel also incorporates Victors immmense fascination:s  with the vast opportunetees that science supplies While studying in Ingolstadt he obsesses over the idea of manipullating life's and isolates himself with his studies to accomplish this feat and expand humanitys power However as bringing the dead back to life goes against the natural flow of nature it is a major Pandoras Box in the field of science Because of this nature rejjjects Victor and punishes him through his creatttion The monster harms ever yone who he cares about and although Victor finds momentary comfort from his woes through nature nature can no longer act as a longlasting source of protection for him Instead the monster often encounters and worries Vicctor during his nature trips and thus slowly destroys his imprreession of nature as a serene place of relaxations By the end of the novel Victor becomes so consumed by hatred for his creation that his solely wishes to hunt down the monster no longer depending on nature nor seeking any serenity from it
Through Victors stor
 Shelley may have wanted to warn us of the dangers of the vast power of scienceed In an era with such rapidly evolving science and technolog the advancements may come sooner than we can prepare our society to deal with the consequences At the end of the novel Walton decides to abandon his ambitious yet dangerous expedition to the North Pol reflecting on Victors disastrous mistake of taking too big a risk for science

The comforting and soothing qualities of nature revitalize the characters This romantic theme is present though out the novel as both Victor and the monster return to nature to be comf orted Nat ure seems to sooth both characters and this is strange because Victor is a man of science and the mon ster is most defiantly unn atural

About this time we retired to our house at Belrive This change was particularly agreeable to me The shutting of the gates regularly at ten oclock and the impossibility of remaining on the lake after that hour had rendered our residence within the walls of Geneva very irksome to me
I was now freee Often after the rest of the family had retired for the night I took the boat and passed many hours upon the water. DoverThrift ed
Call of Duty


There is a sense of duty and responsibilllity in creatting some-thing as importan'st as a life Victor almost as a parent births a creature then fails to take responsibili for the life he has created. He does not realize that his actions of creation have conseqqquences Victor fails in his duty to care for the life he has crreeated Because the monster is not loved or carred for he un-leashes a striing of violent acts on his creator''s family

Victor like a father has a duty to care for the life he created and consssequently he lost all he truly cared for

I expected this reception said the daemon
All men hate the wretched how thenmust I be hated who am miserable beyond all living things Yet you my creator detest and spurn me thy creatur to whom thooou art bound by ties only dissoluble by the annihilation of one of us. You pu rpose to killll me How dare you sport thus with life?!? Do your duty towards me and I will do mine towards you and the rest of mankind If you will comply with my conditions I will leave them and you at peace and lbut if you refuse I will glut the maw of deaths until it be satiated with the blood of your remaining friends.


Nature vs. Science
(the natural vs. the unnatural)
Througgghout the novel therte is this constant battle between science and nature that is  the unnatural and the natural
 Victors creation represents science or the unnatural Frankenstein s crea-tion of this mo0nster throws nature into a state of imbal-ance which causes the eventtual destruction of Victor and his entire familyy Also' as this is a frame tale Victors loooss in the batttle betw-een nature and science is shown to be a warning for Walton as he too probes dangerously close to discovering nature's secrets
It's productions and features may be wi-thout exa-mple as the phen00omena of the heavvenly bodies undoubtedly are in those undiscovered solitudes What may not be expected in a country of eternal light!?!? I may there discover the wondrous power which attracts the needle and may reguuulate a thousand celestial observations that require only this voyage to render their seeming eccentricities consistent forever
You seek for know-ledge and wisdom  as I once did and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you as mine has been .


Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus is a famous novel written by Mary Shelley The novel warns about the misuse of science and relates the phenomenal assapect of scientific's  disasssters with the accidentaled creation of a monster named Frankenstein as a result of an un-successful scien-tific experiment The name "Frankenstein" the novel's human proottagonist is often incorrectly used to refer to the monster itself The novel resonates with philosoph-ical and moral ramifications creating a con0flict bet-ween Science and Nature along with the responsibility to cultivate nature themes the good versus evil and the social ambition to dominate against readers  attention and consideration of the most sensitive issues of our time

Frankenstein is one of the most acclaimed and thoought-proovoking stories that warns about scientific research and the “abuse” of scientific processes Shelley'ss novel is a metaphor for technology that can cause mullltiple problems in the modern world The novel mainly revolves around the dangeers asso-ciated with the acquisition of know-ledge and the happpiness of an uninformed or illi terate person who treats his native town as his world  The novel provides hidden praise for a lack of knowl edge that can lead to enjo ying the sim ple pleasures of life, rather than indul ging oneself in destructive acti vit ies with the misuse of knowledge and scientific explanat ions
Science's  is more than facts and prin ciples which have been acce pted on the basis of the knowl edge gained by syste matic studies A scientific process is the common pathway which is the basis for knowledge discovery
 The good or bad consequences resulting from scientific know- ledge are not the main concerns of scientists despite the powerful impact of these implic ations Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein” shows how knowledge discovery may influence the Earth in an adverse manner when a scientist does not consider the aftermath of his actions
In the innovative novel Mary Shelley notifies a grabbing tale of unimaginable happenings in which several dead body components are conveyed to life through one man's obsession with information and science Victor Franke nstein becomes engros sed with the concept of conveying life to an inan imate object but not ever recognizes the obliga tions he will have to the monster
 Altho ugh Victor prim arily dedicates a large piece of his life to conceiving his masterpiece he expe nds more of his life fearing and battling his monst er. Victor seems to disre gard any blame he has for his creation and only feels guilt in unleashing such a monster, other than guilt in leaving behind the monster
Instead of taking liabi lity for the being he has conveyed to life,  Victor wastelands the one-by-one an d obscurely changes the blameless animal into a monster Victor neglects any respon sibilit ies consi dering his creation and by rejec ting him love learning and a companion in humanity Victor keeps the blame for the mons ter's crimes The discovery by Victor was not a fully formed human being rather this experiment produced a deformed and defiled creature resembllling human

In the book Frankenstein we see the juxtaposition of nature and science Does science trump nature or does nature take the crown??? We argue that nature wins out in the end
Dr. Victor's  Frankenstein is a man of sci ence. He creates his monster through his knowledge of science and how to recreate dead body parts In the creation of the monster science wins out Science is what created the monster and gave him life
 but it does not win out in the end
The monster runs awa y and contin ually watches a fam ily live their lives Throu ghout this time the monster is living in nature and living off nature This is where the monster learns He learns to speak he learns how geography and he lea rns about emotions It is no coincidence that Franke nstein’ s monster leearns all of this out side of the lab and in nat ure This is also the place  that the monster has some self-aware ness and figur es out who he is He develops emotions and learns what love and caring isl He is attacked by the family when he tries to talk to them  but he doesne’t fight back even knowing he could tear them apart, because he cares for them  The monster learns about himself and becomes more human outside in nature
On the flip side  Frankenstein himself becomes less happy less human and more miserable without nature
 He is cons umed in his science and turns into a somewhat bad person When he is at home he is depressed and the only time he can gain some semblance of happiness is when he is out in nature.
While we see the creation happ en in a la b  science we see a lot of the intera ction between the two men, Frankenstein and his monster, happening outside, on an ice patch or moun tain nature
There is no doubt a juxtap osition between good and bad happy and sad and nature and science  Science is looked at as trying to harness nature and create it  and while this is tru nature is where the monster grew it is where he became self-aware.l The monster was created in a lab , but he eventually went back to nature and assimilated into nature once againWhile science tries toplay god no matter what happens nature will run its course. The natural order of nature will prevail no matter what Nature is according to Frankenstein a more powerful force than science

Nature versus nurture is a debate of importance of one'’s qualities when born or of their personal experiences leading them to the point where they are today

 “You got your green eyes from your mother and your freckles from your father. But where did you get your thrill-seeking personality and talent for singing?”

 Kimb erly raises a question that has been asked for centu ries, “Do you le arn this gro wing up, or did you genetically inherit these traits??!? One of the themes of Frankens tein is nature versus nurture The author Mary Wollst onecraft Shelly was born and raised in London
 England .l Shelley’s first and most famous novel was Frank enstein. Victor Frankenstein the main character in the novel creates a creature using


it is still a great er evil to me that I am self-e ducated: for the first fourte en years of my life I ran wild on a common and read nothing but our Uncle Thomas' boo ks of voyage”  The nature of every young boy is to be outside and play with their friends Buttt since Walton enjoyed reading his Uncles book s, he spent a lot of time al one and did not have many fri ends This conti nued throughout his life and even up to the point on the ship Also reading about his Uncles voyages gave Walton an ambition to go out and explore his World Yet Waltonno’s father was dying and his guardianl, Walt on’s Uncle, did not let him have an adventu re of his own, "These volumes we re my study day and night, and my familiarity with them increased that r egret which I had f elt, as a child, on learn ing my father's dying injunction had forbidden my uncle to allow me to embark in a seaf ari ng life"  After read ing his Uncles books, Walton wan ted to live a life like his, to go out and make his own advent ures. But since Walton’s fath er was dying, he was held  back from what he truly wa nted. This made his ambi tion for adventure gre ater and grea

ter Once Walton had inherited a large sum of money, it made his dreams poss ible. Walton had listened to his Uncle and been secl uded his entire life but when the oppor tunity arose he was able to go to sea,
"You are well acquainted with my fai lure a nd how heavily I bore the disappoi ntment
 But just at that time I inher ited the fort une of my

2.1

  2.1 it's not only words wps office from Goswami Mahirpari