Tuesday, 14 November 2017

        Coleridge: Biographia Literaria    

Q.1-Write in your words the difference between poem and prose.

A.1-

Definition:-

Prose:-Prose is a form of language that has no formal metrical structure. It applies a natural flow of speech, and ordinary grammatical structure rather than rhythmic structure, such as in the case of traditional poetry.

Poem :-A poem is a collection of spoken or written words that expresses ideas or emotions in a powerfully vivid and imaginative style. A poem is comprised of a particular rhythmic and metrical pattern.

Ø Poem

·        It is a lyrical form of writing.

·        It has structure, format and rhyming in the sentences.

·        It is usually divided into lines or phrases.

·        It is more expressive and attractive.

·        It serves to excite the readers.

·        It is imaginative.

Ø prose

·        It is the typical form of writing.

·        It has no structure, format and rhyming in the sentences.

·        It is not usually divided into sentences.

·        It is dull.

·        It is simple and common.

·        It is quite ordinary.

Ex:-

Poetry from “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” written by Robert Frost.

“The woods are lovely, dark and deep.

But I have promises to keep,

And miles to go before I sleep,

And miles to go before I sleep.”

Prose Form

“The woods look lovely against the setting darkness and as I gaze into the mysterious depths of the forest, I feel like lingering here longer.  However, I have pending appointments to keep and much distance to cover before I settle in for the night or else I will be late for all of them.”

Q.2-Write in your words the difference between poem and poetry.

A.2-

Definition:-   

Poem :-A piece of writing in which the expression of ideas is given intensity by particular attention to diction (sometimes involving rhyme), rhythm and imagery.  

Poetry:-Literary work in which the expression of feelings and ideas is given intensity by the use of distinctive style and rhythm; poems collectively or as genre of literature.

The word poem is often used in the sense of an individual piece of work. Poetry is a collected work. In other words it is a collective term used to indicate many pieces of individual poems. Poetry is a literary form whereas a poem is a written piece of work.

• Poetry is a literary form, whereas a poem is a written piece of work.

• Poetry is an art form, whereas a poem is a composed work.

• He who composes poems occasionally cannot be called a poet but can be called a versifier.

• A poem is the fundamental unit of poetry. It can thus be said that poetry is made of poems.

Worksheet: Aristotle's Poetics

 Q.1-  How far do you agree with Plato’s objection to freedom of expression and artistic liberty enjoyed by creative writers? Name the texts (novels, plays, poems, movies, TV soaps etc which can be rightfully objected and banned with reference to Plato’s objections)

(1-A).I agree Plato's objection to freedom of expression is true because some kind of serials ,advertisement and literary text is not good aspect for examples are

➨Ahaliya-indra, kunti's children and many other's things

.

➨Sony tv serial "Bharat ka veer putar 'Maharana pratap" .

In real life Maharana Pratap and Akbar never came face to face with each other. But here the two have been fighting each other ever since they were kid. Like every other serial, this serial Forget history, the serial just like any other contemporary TV show is full of saas bahu saajish and melodrama.

➨In the tragedy "Othello" by William Shakespeare During the drama the audience finds itself in concepts of love,hate,jealousy.Othello killed his wife.

➨Advertisements of "Domino's pizza" and other advertisements .97% of all food advertised to all food advertised to make children's unhealthy levels of fat, sugar,or salt.

So I agree with Plato's objection.

Q.2.  With reference to the literary texts you have studied during B.A. programme, write brief note on the texts which followed Aristotelian literary tradition (i.e. his concept of tragedy, catharsis, tragic hero with hamartia etc)

(2-A).Aristotle defines tragedy as, “the imitation of an action that is serious and also has moving magnitude, complete in itself; in appropriate and pleasurable language… in a dramatic rather than narrative form; with incidents arousing pity and fear, where with to accomplish a catharsis of emotions”, . These are unique qualities which can be in Othello. The story starting with the main character and protagonist Othello, an African general for the Venice army. Othello has just married his wife Desdemona. Throughout the play Othello is challenged by Iago who works under him. Iago provides the drama; he represents the antagonist.Nothing good becomes of this play. By the end of this tragedy, both Othello and Desdemona are dead.

Q.3.  With reference to the literary texts you have studies during B.A. programme, write brief note on the texts which did NOT follow Aristotelian literary tradition. (i.e. his concept of tragedy, catharsis, tragic hero with hamartia etc.)

(3-A.) Harry Ape as a modern tragedy does not follow the theory of Aristotle. Yank the hero has no hamartia as he is not a man of highrank . there are the action not external but internal.

Q.4.  Have you studied any tragedies during B.A. programme? Who was/were the tragic protagonist/s in those tragedies? What was their ‘hamartia’?

(4-A). Othello by william shakespeare tragedy I study in my B.A pogramme.follow necessary rules and regulations proposed bAristotle's definition of tragic hero othello follow this definition and not only othello reprsent a hero as a general of an army ,he is the main character of the play.he draws compassion and sympathy from the audience making him the tragic hero.

5. Did the ‘Plot’ of those tragedies follow necessary rules and regulations proposed by Aristotle? (Like chain of cause and effect, principle of probability and necessity, harmonious arrangement of incidents, complete, certain magnitude, unity of action etc)

(5-A)."othello" follow necessary rules and regulations proposed by Aristotle.

Paper -4 presentation

To evaluate my presentation click here,



Paper-3 presentation

Paper-2 presentation

Paper 1 presentation

Monday, 13 November 2017

Mahir pari 's assignment on dryden's comparative ,Shakespeare ,ben jonso

To evaluate my assignment click here


Name  :- Goswami mahirpari
Class.   :- M.A.sem - 1
Topic.    :- Dryden's comparative
           Shakespeare Ben jonso          
Paper no.  :- 3
Enrollment :- 2069108420180021
Number
Yer.       :- 2017 - 19
E mail  goswamimahirpari786@gmail
Submitted.  :- S.B.Garedi English         
             Department
            About critic :-
                     
( , Jhon Dryden )
      
 
     
    
Born         19 August 1631
             Aldwincle,Thrapston       
            Northamptonshire,
            England
Died       12 May 1700 (aged 68)
           London;England.
Occupation.  poet,literary critic,
            playwright ;librettist
Alma mater   Westminster School
               TrinityCollege
               Cambridge
Notableworks  AbsalomaAchitophel ,
              Mac Flecknoe
             ,The Hind the Panther.
Origin of " criticism " :-
                    Literary criticism is the study evaluation  or interpretation of literature Modern literary criticism is often influenced by literary theory which philosophical descusion of literature goals and methods
Though the two activities are closely related literary critics are not always have not alway be theorist
Whether or not literary criticism be conside a separate field of inquiry from literary theory or coonversel from book reveewing is a matter of some conttroversy
** :For example
the Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism draws no distinction  literary theory  literary critici or almost always uses the terms together to descrebe  same concept Some critics consider literary criticism a practical of leterary theory because criticism  deals directly with particular literary works while theory may be more general .
Literary criticism  often published in essay   Academic literary critics teach in literature college and published in academic journal  or more popular critics publish the previews in brooadlley circullaat period's as the time literar
Suplement  the New York Times Book  r-eview London Review of Books  The Nation and The New Yorker.
History of criticism :-
                   Literary criticism is thought to have existe as long literature t he 4 century bc aristotley wroote the
Poetics a typology and description literary form many specefec criticis of contemporary work of art
Poetics developed for the first time  concept of mimessees or catharsis  are still crucial in literary studies Plato'  atack on poetry as imettateve seconda  and false were formateve as well Around the same time
***   """. Bharata Muni  his
Natya Shastra ; wrote literary criticism on ancient
Indian literature and Sanskrit drama   """  ***
Later classical  medieval criticism focus on religious text several long relegeous traddettions of  her-meneutics a textual exege have  a proffound inflfuenc on the study or secular text  partiticularl case f the literary tradite ** ""  the 3 Abrahamic religions  :
1.)  Jewish literature
2 .)  Christian literature
3.)   Islamic literature
Literary criticism was also emplo other form in medieval Arabic literature and Arabic poetry from
9 century notably in
**Al-Jahiz in his al-Bayan wa-'l-tabyin and al-Hayawan **.
Definition of criticism :-
                       criticism
ˈkrɪtɪsɪz(ə)m/
noun
the expr ession of di sapproval someon a something on the basis of perceive faults or mistakes.
"he received a lot of criticism"  
(1.): the act of criticizing usually 
     unfavorably
(2.) a critical observation or remark
(3.) critique seeking encouragement rather than criticism
an unfair criticism  a minor criticism of the design
** "" : the art of evaluating or analyzing works of art or literature also "". ** :-
(1.) writings expressing such evaluation or analysis two
an anthology of literary criticism
(2.) the scientific investigation of literary document in regard to such matters as origin text composition or history .
Preface ,:-
John Dryden is  English
poet dramatist  critic he is the most important in literatur of the Restoration age  John Dryden most important prose work
** “
""Of Dramatic Poesy
An Essay” **
give him the reputations as the father of
   "" English literary criticism""
John Dryden represented the con+fflicting claems  the  2
sides as debate among four friends ,One of the them favours the ancient over the modern theater, One modernist prefers the French drama where as Dryden himself likes the life like drama of English theataer to French tragedy. which jo -hn considers beautiful lifeless
## Dryden includes the five points in this essay which are as below :##
A). Ancients versus Moderns
B). Unities
C). French versus English drama
D). Separation of tragedy and    Comedy versus Tragicomedy
E). Appropriateness of Rhyme in    drama
Discussion of ancients and moderns should not be for who is ‘better’ It should be more fundamental lg about how hi story itself func d should b read this if should be about the relations between past and present humanity and nature's a human un- derstanding and knowledge's
First we overview the conflict  the ancients and moderns and then we discuss in details separately.
· Controversy of the ancients and moderns :
In the age of Dryden there is the most important and high raged cha- tig  on the comparative meriestt and demerits of the ancients and moderns Welllknown satire writer Swift treated this chating on his famous work
**"
“ THE BATTLE THE BOOKS ”  **
Dryden also gives the argument on behalf moderns through the mouth of * Eugenius *  one of the four debtors in the essay
The case for the * Ancients *i s presented by * Crites * Ilcontroversy Dryden takes no extreme position follows the golden meanse  and is sensible en-
ough to give the Ancients their respect Means… Dryden does not disparage the ancients
          Through his dispassionate balanced and sane attitude  makes us see clea rly the achievementse  of the Ancients ad the indebtedness of the moderns to there as well as significa nt advances which have been made in modern times 
  Dryden was very well known critic in his time view on many writer like Ben Johnson, Shakespeare, Beaumont and Fletcher and many other writers  In an essay of dramatic poesy  he give new concept PR and Ben Johnson give good and bad side of the writers writing an essay of dramatic po
In1668 he wrote his important prose work of
“** Dramatic poesy an essay **” Dryden’s own defense of his literary practices, The four gentlemen Eugenius, Crites, Lisideius and Neander begin an ironic and witty conversant on the subject of Poetry which soon turns into a debate's on the virtu of modern or ancient writers
Restoration gravity  Dryden in his essay of dramatic poesy explains the favorable public response to plays by citing their      Unive -
rsal appeal.  they had written  2
or   3.  very  vunsuccess -fully as the like is reported of Ben Johnson  He rewrites every man in his humor pepper square drilling more regular than Shakespeare’s.
Dryden’s comparative criticism of
         Ben Johnson :-
       
***“Huumor was his proper sphere and in that he delight  most to   represe -
nt Mechanic people  He invades authors like a monarch and what would be thefte in others poets is onl-
y victory in him  a fault in his languaged in his play he didn't a little to much to Romanize our tongue
Leaving the word which he  translat -
ed almost as much Latin as he found them Wherein though he learnedly followed the Idiom of their language he did not enough comply with ours” **
Jonson have been done robberies so openlly authors like a monarch's he was represent old Rome to us.
He was master of mankind lovely of
any of his scenes His genius was to serious to do it gracefullyy he was deeply conversant in the ancient Greek and Latin So time he translate'sd word to word from ancient Dryden's  remarks on Ben Jonson who is compared with Shakespeare and in this way  of the respective merits of the 2 are brought out.
Ben Jonson is among the best nown writers and theorists of English     renaissance.    litera-
ture second in reputation only to Shakespeare A prollific dramatist and a man of letters highly learne
in the classics's he profoundllly influennced Augusstan age throough his emphasis on the precepts of Horac  Aristotle and other classical Greek and Latin thinkers
“as for Jonson  to who-
se character I am now arrived if we look upon him while he was himself For his last plays oo were but his dotages I think him the most learned and judicious writer which any theater ' s ever had He was a most severe judge of himself as well as others  In his work you find little to retrench or alter.wit and language's  and humor also in some measure we had before him I but sometime or anything  something drama was waiting till he came He managed his strength to more advntaggse then any who preceded him You seldom find him making love in any of his genius was 2 sullen and saturnine to do it gracefully especially when he
new he came after time to  those who perormed booeoth of such a heeght”.
**  Eugenius views on The Modernize  **  :-
Eugenius favors the moorderns over ancients so he replies to Crites that
In the be ginning he be lieves tha -
t the moderns have learned much from the ancients The moderns are indebted to them for rules of dramatically compositionally and must be gratefully appreciated to them for it The moderns are not following's  with blind way but they excel new thing's es in many ways He argues that modernist have model so that they learn from that and gi ves new ideas from  th-
eir example's .
because of the gr eater pains the-
y take they are nearer to perfe-
ction than the ancients Their greater la,dor makes them super-
ior in science as well in poetry But Crites proves that….
“ *** ancients imitated nature more perffooectly thanme the moderns has not estalishd.”***
Dryden’s comparative criticism of  
        Shakespeare :-
 
He is the very Janus of poets he wears almost every where 2
faces and you have scarce begun to one even you de oospise th -
e other He shows lovely passio-
n and present situ ation in his work Dryden say that Shakespeare is far above him he was quite con -
scious of both the weakness and greatness of Shakespeare
Androids and windows forms to John Dryden Shakespeare main who all modern and perha-
ps ancient poet of the largest and most comp ooes rehensive in his own time William Shakespeare was rated as merely one among talented playwright and poets but since  in  17 century he has bee-
n considered impaired of the English language
Some of Dryden’s so comments are repeated from earlier writers notably the assurance that Shakespeare's art was natural this time used almost as an excu se to justify the awkward fact that he did not follow the  rules as so in his play carefully as Jonson He did not pull his punches when it came to descr ibing what as Shakespe -
are’s faults He found Shakespeare’s plots  loose in construcn and deplored bombast of his passionate speeches destiny and imaginary was not so much as so many to good
*** Shakespeare:
”the begin then wh Shakespeare
he was the man who of all moder-
ns and perhaps poets had the large-
st and most comp rehensive sou All the images of naturally were still present to him and he drew them not laboriously but luckily when he descr ibes anythi oose ng you mo-
re than see it you feel it 2Those wh-
o accuse him to have wanted learn
-ing give him the greater compensation he was naturally learnoed  he needed not the specta cles of books to read nature he looked inwards and found her there I cannot where alike i were he so I should do him injury's to comp -are him with the gr eate st of mankind and to  He is many times flat insipid his comic wit degevvrse nerating into clenches his serious swel ling into bom bast But he is always great when some great occasion is pres but ented to him no human can say he ever had a fit subsection for his wit and did not raise himself as high above the rest of the poets.”
No other dram atist has be-
en perfor med even remotely as often on the world stage's as Shakespeare's  in his remark on Shakespeare Jhon  Dryden cease-
s to be a class icist and goes over to the other camp of the romantics
His appr but to eciation of the compr foe the to ehensive souled of Shakespeare as  a tribute to his  comprehensive soul and imag -inative sensibility
**  Conclusion  ** :-
  
“***  I admire Jonson a lot but I love Shakespeare.”***
  :- Dryden say ,” ***
I   must acknowledg him the more correct poet but Shakespeare this greatest wit he was the homer or father of our dramatically poet Jonson was virgil the pardnr of elaborate writteing he has given as the most correct playe so on the Precept's which he has laid doowwn on his discoeries we have is mony and profitability ruless for  f prefifxing the stage as any where which the French can furnish us john Dryden’s work “ Of Dramatic Poesy An essay’ gives the clieam of the two sdes as a chatinge among four friends And Dryden himself likes the lifelike  as life like dramatically of English thesaoater to French  tragedy which he considers beautiful but lifeless.
                            
    
  

Mahir pari 's assignment on critique on flea

To evaluate my assignment click her


Name  :- Goswami mahirpari
Class.   :- M.A.sem - 1
Topic.    :- Critique on Flea
Paper no.  :- 1
Enrollment :- 2069108420180021
Number
Yer.       :- 2017 - 19
E mail  goswamimahirpari786@gmail
Submitted.  :- S.B.Garedi English         
             Department.
             Introdution
About poet :-
            Dr.Samuel Johnson
           
             
 
             
      Done painting by isaae Oliver

Born          22 January 1572[1]
              London , England
Died         31 March 1631 (aged 58)
             London, England
Occupation   Poet, priest, lawyer
Nationality   English
Alma mater  Hart Hall, Oxford
            University of Cambridge
Genre Satire, love poetry, elegy , sermons
Subject Love, sexuality , religion, death
Literary movement Metaphysical poetry
           " metaphysical poetry "
Metaphysical poetry occupies a unique place in the history of English poetry. A group of poets emerged in the beginning of the seventeenth century, in the age of Milton or Jacobean age which tried to write poetry in altogether different way and their poetry come to be known as the Metaphysical poetry.
It was Dr. Samuel Johnson who for the first time used the term ‘metaphysical poetry’ for the poetry of John Donne and his followers. Since Donne was the pioneer, it is known as the school of Donne or The School of Metaphysical Poetry. Dr. Samuel Johnson while giving introduction to the life of Abraham Cowley used the term metaphysical poetry to identify the poetry of Donne and his followers. The poets who followed the style of John Donne are: Richard Crashaw, George Hurbert, Abraham Cowley and Andrew Marvell. These are the main metaphysical poets.
When Dr. Johnson used the term metaphysical poetry, it was in a negative sense , to criticise the poetry of Donne and his followers. But with the passing of the time the tone of the term was changed and it became a term of appraisal, giving merit to the School of Donne.
Definition of metaphysical poetry :-
          
         """""   highly intellectualized poetry marked by bold and ingenious conceits, incongruous imagery, complexity and subtlety of thought, frequent use of paradox, and often by deliberate harshness or rigidity of expression """""
Origin of the metaphysical poetry  :-
                                The term metaphysical poets was coined by the critic Samuel Johnson to describe a loose group of 17th-century English poets whose work was characterized by the inventive use of conceits , and by a greater emphasis on the spoken rather than lyrical quality of their verse. These poets were not formally affiliated and few were highly regarded until 20th century attention established their importance. Given the lack of coherence as a movement, and the diversity of style between poets, it has been suggested that calling them Baroque poets after their era might be more useful. Once the Metaphysical style was established, however, it was occasionally adopted by other and especially younger poets to fit appropriate circumstances.
"About John Donne " :-
                     He is considered the pre-eminent representative of the metaphysical poets . His works are noted for their strong, sensual style and include sonnets , love poems, religious poems, Latin translations, epigrams ,
elegies , songs, satires and sermons . His poetry is noted for its vibrancy of language and inventiveness of metaphor , especially compared to that of his contemporaries. Donne's style is characterised by abrupt openings and various paradoxes, ironies and dislocations. These features, along with his frequent dramatic or everyday speech rhythms, his tense syntax and his tough eloquence, were both a reaction against the smoothness of conventional Elizabethan poetry and an adaptation into English of European baroque and mannerist techniques. His early career was marked by poetry that bore immense knowledge of English society and he met that knowledge with sharp criticism. Another important theme in Donne's poetry is the idea of true religion, something that he spent much time considering and about which he often theorized. He wrote secular poems as well as erotic and love poems. He is particularly famous for his mastery of metaphysical conceits .

His writing style :-
                His work has received much criticism over the years, especially concerning his metaphysical form. Donne is generally considered the most prominent member of the metaphysical poets , a phrase coined in 1781 by
Samuel Johnson , following a comment on Donne by
John Dryden .
Dryden had written of Donne in 1693:
He affects the metaphysics, not only in his satires, but in his amorous verses, where nature only should reign; and perplexes the minds of the fair sex with nice speculations of philosophy, when he should engage their hearts, and entertain them with the softnesses of love."
In Life of Cowley (from Samuel Johnson's 1781 work of biography and criticism Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets ), Johnson refers to the beginning of the seventeenth century in which there
"appeared a race of writers that may be termed the metaphysical poets".
Donne's immediate successors in poetry therefore tended to regard his works with ambivalence,
with the
Neoclassical poets regarding his conceits as abuse of the metaphor .
Izaak Walton have wrote biography of
      Donn in ( 1658 ) :
he returned not back into England till he had stayed some years, first in Italy , and then in Spain, where he made many useful observations of those countries, their laws and manner of government, and returned perfect in their languages.
                 
                  — Izaak Walton

About poem :-
             
The flea                MARK but this flea, and mark in this, How little that which thou deniest me is ; It suck'd me first, and now sucks thee,  And in this flea our two bloods mingled be. Thou know'st that this cannot be said A sin, nor shame, nor loss of maidenhead ;     Yet this enjoys before it woo,     And pamper'd swells with one blood made of two ;     And this, alas ! is more than we would do.  O stay, three lives in one flea spare, Where we almost, yea, more than married are. This flea is you and I, and this Our marriage bed, and marriage temple is. Though parents grudge, and you, we're met, And cloister'd in these living walls of jet.     Though use make you apt to kill me,     Let not to that self-murder added be,     And sacrilege, three sins in killing three.  Cruel and sudden, hast thou since Purpled thy nail in blood of innocence? Wherein could this flea guilty be, Except in that drop which it suck'd from thee? Yet thou triumph'st, and say'st that thou Find'st not thyself nor me the weaker now. 'Tis true ; then learn how false fears be ; Just so much honour, when thou yield'st to me, Will waste, as this flea's death took life from thee.
Summary :-
           The poet  tell his be loved to lookef at the flea bef -ore them or  to note “how little” is that thing that she denied him  For the flea he  has sicked firest his blood's then her blood's so that now in sides the flea they are mingles  and that ming -
ling cannot be called
""" sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead.”
The flea has join them tog ether in a way that,
“alas is more than we would do”
As his be lov move to killed the flea the poet  said her hand's asking her to spare the 3  lives in the flea:
"his life #her life and #the flea’s ownlife""
the flea he says where their blo -
od is mingle  they are almost married+no more than married+and the flea is their marrriage bed and marriage temple mixed into one Though their parents grudge their romane or  tho ugh she will not make love to him they are neverthee
unit  or  cloister in the living wall -
s of the flea She was apt to kill him poet said but he asks that she not kill herself by killing the flea that contain -
ed her blood's he says'e  that to kill the flea wooould be sacrilegeed
"" three sins in killing three ""”
“Cruel and sudden” the s poet  calls his lover who has now killd the flea
“purplinged” her fingernail with the “blood of innocence” The speaker asks his lover what the flea"s sin is other than having suck. from each of them a drop of blood's He says that his belover replies that neither of them is less noble for having killed the flea
It is true he side  and  is this very fact that proved  that her fears are false If she were to sleep with him “yield to me” she would lose no more honored than she losted when she kill's the flea
Analysis :-
            John Donne’s poem "The Flea" is a complexity's yet simple explanted of a desired to for sex The poet  use  a flea as an argument as to why his beloved should engage -
ment in the sexualed act
In "1633" when the poem was writte -
n sex before marriaged would be consider a sin and that’s why the poet
was  trying to convinced otherwise
The literal meaninged  of the poem is about a little flea who sucksed  blood 's from the port  and his be -
lov which give the poet courage to reason with his be love about sex He claimed that what this flea has done has intertwin's  them already and therefore the actual act of sex would not be consider sinfuled  However she kill  the flea meaninged that sleeping with him would make her more sinful than killinged the flea
the overall meaning of the poem's is expressed through the 3
stanzas of the poem As readers we get a conversationaled  tone from stanza
* He is trying to explain  how little  the flea that she deniesed  is and explained what this flea has done By sucking him first and then sucking her in this flea our two bloods mingl be  Repetition of the word  suck can al -
so be seeen as adding to the central theme of sex The speaker then clai-
ms that what this flea has done
cannot be called sin nor shame nor - loss of maidenhead  which refers to virginity  Donne ends off the first stanza by explaininged  how the flea has joined them in a particular way which is more than we would do
By the openinged of stanza 2  the topic of marriage's  is brought into the poet ' s argumented as the bel -
over wishes to kill the flea
He attempts to convince her not to
by saying this flea is you and i and this our marriage bed's and marriage temple is.   which coveys a mess -
age that they are now marrid because they're blood is together inside this flea's  Marriage also contribute's to the central theme of sex because marriage would no longered  make sex sinfuled  Therefore if the spea -
ker can convinc  his belov  that they are technically marries he can hold ho-
pe of receiving what’s desir  Stanza two is also the turning point's Through another conversationaled tone Donne says though parent's grudge we are cloistered  or secluded in the body 's of this flea and to not add self-murder to the equation There will be  3
sins in killing thee  meaning's if she killd that one flea she not only kills it but herself and him
The beloved end's the argument probably out of annoyance by sim -
ply killing the flea causing Donne to call her cruel and sudden   in stanza 3. In an efffort for justification's he ask why she killled the flea  wherein could this flea's guilllty be  beca use all it’s done is take one drop of bloood's from each of us  However within her responded he concluded that her alleged fear of sin is false bec -
ause if she had sex with him it would be the same as the sin committ by killlling the flea
The way the poem is formatted also makes this poem great. The entire poem is made up of a combination of iambic tetrametered  and iambic pentameter which is most commonly The author uses the last two lines of each stanza to show iambic's pentametered  making the en -
tire poem a 4 then 5 stressed syllable line The last two lines being 5 stressed syllable linesed
The rhyme scheme in this particular poem follows an AABBCCDDD pattern which means that Donne rhymes the first 2  lines the second 2  lines the
3 two lines and the last three lines in each stanza Sound device's such as alliteration are used throughout the poem making the rhythm lucid like
sucked and  sucks  in stanza 1 marriage or  marriage. 
in stanza 2 and  thou triumphst that thou  in stanza 3
The entire poem can be seen as a big metaphor's as the flea is used to symbolized  their love or sex The blood 's the flea hold  inside of him is compared to a marriage bed and marriage temple The min gling of the blood also metaphoricallyed stan -
ds for mingling of sex There are a few symbol  that stand out in this poem Marriage for one is essentially symb  -olized Donne tries to make his argument better by saying this flea has basically married us because our blood is joined inside him Sex is also a symbol  however is discretely spoken ofl  His entire argument revolves around the act itself which he later explains would not be less sinful then killinged  the flea Imagery is used through the flea who is also personified  As reader we picture something so small being personified to have such significance to the author’s argument's Similes were found once in the last line of the poem "as this flea’s death took life from thee".
Overall   Donne is conv eying a messageed  that he would like to have sex with his beloved and it is not sinful which ironi.  cally she agre -
es to as she commits a sin herself allowing Donne to conclude her fear was wastefuled The particular form and devices used such as figurative language's Alliteration's or  the rhyme scheme help's the poem seem effortlesslyed  written becccause you dont realiz ed those part abo ut the poem until you further reading Whi -
le the poem can be seen as a serious -
ed persuasions it also con oosists of humorous which make it perfectly logic
Conclusion :-
             though the lover sug  -
gest that he is in control   that it is a matter of “when thou yield’st” some 
  scholars have noted that he is po -
werless to do anything until  woman makes her descusion He merely utters his words of waorming but she can raise her hand and kill the flea similarly she can exxxercise her power by continuant to deny the man his des -
ired the Flea could take what it wantd with out stopp to wooo but the lover uses no forced be yond
force of argume -
ntHe has not ben success so far but we do not now what will happen .
Thank you so much
The end .......

Mahir pari's assignment kanthapura as a myth

To evaluate my assignment click here

Name  :- Goswami mahirpari
Class.   :- M.A.sem - 1
Topic.    :- kanthapura as a myth
Paper no.  :- 4
Enrollment :- 2069108420180021
Number
Yer.       :- 2017 - 19
E mail  goswamimahirpari786@gmail
Submitted.  :- S.B.Garedi English         
             Department.
                         
         Myth in Kanthpura
●       About Raja Rao  :-               
Born                     8 November 1908
                               Hassan, Mysore, India
Died                     8 July 2006 (aged 97)
                               Austin, Texas, United States
Occupation       Writer and professor
Language       English, French, Kannada
Alma mater          University  of Texas
Genre               Novel, short story, essay
Notable works Kanthapura (1938)
Notable awards Sahitya Akademi Award in 1964,
                                 Padma Bhushan in 1969,
                                 Neustadt International Prize for    
                                 Literature in 1988,
                                Padma Vibhushan in 2007.
Introduction
        Myth has always had a very segnefficant poo-sition in human sychology ; mythology in Indian context is perhaps the most utilized and most adm-iredfor ev-ery genaration and genre. The word 'myth'has often sufers from a wrong conotation; so here i am giv-ing definition of myth.
Definition of myth
     Myth is a traditional story of unknown authorship ostensibli with a historical basics but serving us-ually to explain some phenomenan of nature, the origin of men or the  customs,institutions,religious rites, etc. Of a people ; myths usually involv the exploits of godds and heroe.
Myth is ,
  “a traditional or legendary story usualy concerne with deities or Diem-gods and the creation of the world and its inhabitants."
" A primitive habit of mind myth are the life blood of life.’’
Myth of Village Kanthpura
   The dramatic tale narrated by the old woman, Rangamma evoke the spirit of Indias traditional folk epic, puran, the technique adopted by Rao is flash back technique.
   The story is narrated by an old grand mother to a new comer to the village. kanthapura is the village  of south india; kenchamma godes. people are poor simple, superstitious, religious there are number of mythical devise in kanthapura; it is excellent example of combination of puranic and folktale elements right in the centre of the village is a temple dedicated to kenchama great godes, benign one all the villagers are belive in Goodness kenchamma.
   There is a folk song which evoke in us image or attitude as to what kenchamma means to the people of kanthapura
"Goddess benign and bounteous ,
            Mother of earth, blood life,
Harvest queen, rain  crowned,
            Goddess benign and bounteous."
   Myth is an inseparable part of the culture of any country. India is essentially a culturaly rich country. Every village of India has its own story of origin though it may or may not be true. Myth form an important part of every human particular of those who are away from the scientific knowledge.
   Raja rao in his novel Kanthapura had made myth one of the primary factor that continue the novel,In spite of being residing and educating in foreign he shows his faith in mythology.
   The plot of the story is laid in an imaginary village which is surrounding by other imeginary villages.  In this novel  Raja rao make the narative in the form of sthala purana and an old lady is the narator of the story, His Kanthapura is based on the pattern of "Ramayana". The way in which Ramayana is narrated by "Sage Valmiki" Achakka is the narrator and commentator.
   She compare Gandhi with Rama and India with Sita.Gandhi was gone to England is compared to Ramas exil and Indians are consulted with Bharath. Like Ayodya, Kanthapura is a casteriden village which is far  away from  moden views of living.As Sita is capture and  by Ravana; in the same way India were captured and looted by Redmen. Like Rama save of Sita same Gandhi also strugle to free India from British. In Ramayana  Rama done war against Ravana. Similar in Kanthapura Gandhi wage war against British.
   A way between Rama and Ravana leads to a number of deaths. Similarly when the people of village in war a mant of them are cought, jailed,  and killed.
   At last as Rama save Sita from Ravana; Gandhi save India from British and get Swaraj.
Hence in a sense the novelist describe the same old imaginary story of Ramayana in a new way although the character are change but the story is the same.
   As the novel start Achakka told the sisters about the story of Kanchamma the local daitya of Kanthapura. There were a time when demon spare violence in the country. He made man as his food and women as his wive.
   Kenchamma come from heaven to free the country from the demon and a war broke out between Kenchamma and the demon in which Kenchamma come as victorious and demon was defeated and kiled after Kenchamma starting living with the common people of Kanthapura and helping in their problems.
   Achakka says that its help the people of Kanthapura in their problems even today. This shows that how the people believing  mythical story of Kenchamma and pray her whenever they would face any problem.
   In Kanthapura we also come across various comparisons between Moorthy and Gandhi. The people of Kanthapura give the status of God to Gandhi after learn about his life.
   Moorthy is consider as an avatar of Gandhi. The people find spirituality in Gandhi as well as in Moorthy and blindly accept their advice.
Hence, being a political novel Kanthapura is filled with myth and blind faith ; such myth and blind faith prevalent in all the under develop villages of India.
“There is no village in India however mean  that has not a rich sthala- puran or legend -
ary hi story of it's own some God or gooodlike hero's has passsed by the village Rama might have rest's here under the papal tree  Sita mighted have dried her clothes after her bath o this yellllow stone's or the Mahatma himself on one of his many pilgr images through the country might have slept's in this hut the low one by the village gate's In this way the past mingled with the presentation and goddds mingle with men to make the repertory of our grand mother alway bright. One such story from the contemmmporary annals of my village I have tried to tell”. (kanthapura 5)
The novel rather than bei -
ng tradit ional novel with a neat linear structure's and compact plot KANTHAPURA foll-
ows the tradition of Indian sthala- Purana or legenda-
ry his tory As Raja Rao expla -
ins in KANTHAPURA by the imagery of village and villagers Kant:hapura is microcosm of the macrocosm macrocos- m for what happens in kanthapura was happening all over the country during those stirrring days of the Gandhian freedom struggle as raja rao tells us in the very first sentence of his well known preface to the novel every village in India has a rich sthala purana or lege -
ndary history  It has a legend concerning the local goooddess kenchamma who protects the villager from harm and presi -
des over their destiny The novel -ist style or narration makes it a Gandhi purana or a Gandhi epic
In kanthapura raja rao made an effectively use of the mythically techniquelly used with such successfully by English writer like T.S Eliot and Joyce The use of mythically technique means that the past is juxt aposed with the pr esent an in his way the past may serve as criti cism of the present or it may be used heighten and glorify the present in his waste land T.S.Eliot has used the mythi -cal tech nique to criticize the present and in kanthapura raja -rao has used this very techniquelly to glorify the present and impart to the novel the dignity and status of an epic or purana it is in this way that the Gandhian movement, ”kanthapura is again another and a larger attempt at creating a sthala purana
Conclusion
    Kanthapura is a great regional novel  as well as an interasting sthala purana. The novelist rise from the particular to the general by the use of myth and legend give to the freedom struggle of the kanthapurians an all India characters. The weving of ancient myth in to the structure of the novel give  the quality of timelesness which all great work of art.By mythis sing the heroic struggle and self-sacrifice of the people of the south Indian village he has create a new sthala purana a new local leged.
    The novel illustrate how new legends or sthala puranas are make and how the ordinary and the commonplace acquire larger than life dimension in the imagination of poets and bards and gossipy narrators like Achakka.

Mahir pari's assignment on Robinson Crusoe as a myth

To evaluate my assignment click here


Name  :- Goswami mahirpari

Class.   :- M.A.sem - 1
Topic.    :- Robinson Crusoe as a
            Myth
Paper no.  :- 2
Enrollment :- 2069108420180021
Number
Yer.       :- 2017 - 19
E mail  goswamimahirpari786@gmail
Submitted.  :- S.B.Garedi English         
             Department
       About writer :-
         ( . Daniel Defoe )
   
Born        Daniel Foe
             1659–1660
            London England.
Died       24 April 1731
            (aged 70–72)
            London England.
Occupati Writer
journalist,   merchant
Genre Adventure  
Origin of the myth  : -
                    An origin myth is a myth that purports to describe the origin of some feature of the natural or social world. One type of origin myth is the cosmogonic myth , which describes the creation of the world. However, many cultures have stories set after the cosmogonic myth, which describe the origin of natural phenomena and human institutions within a preexisting universe.
In Western classical scholarship , the terms
etiological myth and aition (from the Ancient Greek αἴτιον, "cause") are sometimes used for a myth that explains an origin, particularly how an object or custom came into existence.
Definition of the myth  :-
                      myth
mɪθ/
noun
1.
a traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.
"ancient Celtic myths"
    traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.  ‘ancient Celtic myths’
[mass noun] ‘the heroes of Greek myth’
      


  Robinson Crusoe as a Myth :-
                          Robinson Crusoe may be a novel in it's treat ment of the individually but in respects to its view of colonization's it  certainly idealizes  is the portra yal of the ultimate eighteenth-chentury British fantastic a human shipwrecked on an island not only survi ves but flour ishes popul ating an enti-
e colonylly  in service of God and - country If Robinson Crusoe is the Empires dream then The Mnstone is its nightmar For Defoe the perip -hery is comp lacent or co-operative It is productive Even while on the peripheral island it is Robinson not Friday  who remain's the focuses of the novel though Robinson and Friday certain sha re a questionably -lly intimated relat ionship Moonstone is interested's in boundarie and in the crossings of them both by people's or ad  by thing's It is asks about the Consequence's lly  of a peripheral push back: what if Friday's weren’t complacently? What if the colonies lly were to infiltrated te core on an existentially l evel that ran dee-
per than the funneling of raw materials's
Chapter 1 of the First Period opens with a description of what is to be found “
*** in the first part of Robinson Crusoe at the page one hund red and twenty-nine you will find it thus written ‘Now I saw, thou gh too late the Folly of beginn ing's a Work bef ore we count the Cost and before we jud -
ge righ -tly of our own Stre ngth to go thr ough with it’” ***
Is this a novel we’ve begun or a critical essay?
For Betteredge
Crusoe is much more than a novel ?   it is his san ctuary and adv-
ice guide He consults it by arbitrarily turning's the pages treating the pass ages he finds with religio references borderinged on obsession Betteredge “has worn out six stout Robinson Crusoes with hard work in his services' 
He even goes so far as to say that “such a book as Robinson Crusoe
never was writtened and never will be writtened form  again”  I think we would be remi to take this state ment as only an indica of an old humaan’s madness whetvher or not we trust Betteredge as a or narrator s an entirelyly  different question's
The danger to in the peri phery penetratingly the core is also party mythological te diamond is not only a raw materials but it is cursed is a product of the social relation surrounding's it is  the 3
Brahmins, the Sultan, the Colonel… but because the diamonds is both a product of social relation or a product's of India it is assumes mystic presenceing which haunts the novel The mythology of the diamond escal ates the st stakes of the conflict to the  not only has the periphery insinuates itself into the cor, but the core cannot even firmly articulate's if us as to the curse of the diamonds is simply “a fancifully storyline” or a threat to be taken seriouslylly
The myth of "Robinson Crusoe" is analogous to the bou urgeois myth
Crusoe's story about his twenty eight years life on an island is full of mythic charmsed There is one class of people's  whom the story  "Robinson Crusoe" can assume a timelessness value. That class is the class of bourgeois'eds people The 18 chentury bourgeois people find the perprojection of the assumpions and belief systemsed i Robinson Crusoe's life on a hitherto un inhabited island for twenty eight years
Crusoe worked's hard when he was left in the lurc h on a hith-
erto uninhabited island He believeing is to in the emanci-
patory power of hard work
Work-ethics become the motiv
ating 'sfactor in his lonely life entrapp in the wild of the island Sometimes he used to feel terribly sad's he used to stop working he used to become nervoused in that time he  In the fit of ll extreme sadness he used to interrog ate the divine will He used to contemplate 's on how the divine will operates
At the moment of serious contemplation's he used to console him preordained cause divine cause behind as in his  my entrapped Island-life in loneli-
ness and isolation It is work's or work alone that I can understand ' the mysteryed of the operation of the divine Providence  After thus kind of contemplations Robinson Crusoe used to work
This work-ethics of Crusoe strongly attrac or to  the bourgeois class people. Itlls through hardwork and -rational styles of taking ' precautiov nary measur es that Robinson Crusoe successes in taming this wild islands Behind Crusoe's successful civilizin's-
g mission lies the secret of the rational bent of mind and as a time so the continuous organiz martial powere's gun power The power of reason and the power of gun enabl Robinson Crusoe to assert dominion over all the the island Moreover find it TG hat his protestanted faith of God encouraged him to be loyal to the work-ethnics he clung strictly  These aspects of  robin Crusoe's life on the island bear timeless significance The bourgeois class  human ti and the class of
who undertake the project'd of colonialism have jointly seen the timelessness value and significants in the story of Robinson Crusoe Hence If "The Robinson Crusoe" is the mythcall and or to find it it is the myth of the basically secret of succeed One step ahead it is th-
e myth which is cent ral to th-
e bourgeois s and the s of people who tend to colonize throug-
h conquest
Myth: repetition, contradiction and ideology
The myth then  repeated those event's which are important either from a narrative or isr ideological point of views expressed by the way Indeed a very good these very often coincidence Crusoe’s “masterings of his trau ma throug -
h repetition's”  is less a matter of sychology though it is that than of textual's mythical and hen-
ce ideologically legitimtion Repeatd event include Crusoe’s urge to wandering ostensively an evil but an essentially or  un -resolved drive behind the narrative which is repeated in both large's a or  small formsed through out the story one of Crusoe’s ill-fated boat trips from the island is describes as a dangeroused “ramblings to sea”  Other rep repetitions incv lude the ‘beginn ing mome nt’ of repetitious contradicting in Crusoe’s account's of his first landings upon the island the dream which by to the anticipated the coming's of Friday disc ussed earlier and Friday’s “abandoning of the state of natur-
e for the advantagesed of civilizations”  which repeated with some important difference Crusoe’s  earlier dev develop ment which is the itself also a moveme-
nt from heathenism the is a as symbols of dangeroues individual freeform to Christianity's
Repetition thus occurs of tho-
se narratived event which form point of tension or thus where the power's of the myth as in bearer of ideologues needs to be reinforced but in the same movements the repetition's signals that some -
thing of an ideological nature pperhaps a potential threat or change to the existent social morality is seeking releas-
e Similarlytion  contradiction reveal the rupture where something of the real historically condition can be glimpsed beneath the fabric of the mythcall Both repeti tion and contradictions can be round in the famous episode where Crus-
oe comes upon a drawertion  full of gold in the shipwrecks This has been analysd by many critics  but only Zelnick notes that the finding of gold is repeatedly later and none comments upon the fact that the whole sequence of shipw reck to the findings an salvation of gold and supplies is repeated in a rema - rkably similar form later in the book when Crusoe observes a ship running onto subm erged rocks-
and his reac tion is to give tha-
nks to God that “of two ships’ companiesedv  who were now cast away upon this part's of the world not one life should be spar but mine”  He then raids this ship and finds a seaman’single chest with “fifty pieces or o is f eight in royals”: “however I lugged this money home to my cave and laid it up”
The hoading of the gold des-
pite its lack of utility is of course a contra diction the gold must initiall-
y be rejects but then admitt since Crusoe is the economic man and reveals the impurity of Crusoe’s State of Nature's At the same time it elliptica point to the major unresolvd contradicon in the text which arises from a historically emer ging desire for yet the inherent dang er of freedom from restriction's in the economically sphere embossed in the mobility and restrictions of the individual the an opposition's of passivity:action and inherent in Crusoe’s prison island run on a laissezfaire economy's
Defoe’s book is crossed by many discoursed religiously normal economics comm ercial or and colonialism These discourses intersect in multiple ways just wanted to look forward  for example commerci an moral disco urses join in Crusoe’s ‘moral bookkeeping’ although here it might be more appro priate to see comme rcial disco urse as colon and hence structuring mo-
ral thought's Here I will argue that three of these discours bearing the weight of ideas of econo-
mics individualism and colonialism respective are treat or to and have histo rically been reading in such a way as to confer a mythical status upon the novel
In all three cases mythcall funct - ions or emer ges in the text in at least three ways. Firstly, myth - serves as a myth of origin wheth-
er in a really chronological sens-
e many ‘primitive’ mythcall an legend's tell o the original of hum-
an and his envir ons, for example or in the sense which gives a priority to a particular elem ent of the book the individual manby  for exampe as an historical or social dete - rminant and hence thought of as in some way ‘prior’ to larger compounds macrocos- 
mic structured To cover bovth these senses  but espe cially the latter I will use the term ‘originary’. Second  myth env tails some sense of unre ality of fals-
ity or uto pian fantasy usu-ally detecte and measurd here against ‘real’, document historical evidenc. As ideology this may involve an ‘essentialisation’ of complexity's in some sense reduction simplifica
or notsoradical separation of the element's’ Thirdly on the level of form and pattern myth w-
orks through the narrative as ‘adventure sto and through repe “the funcion of repetitio is to render the structure of the mythcall apparet”
These three elements of myth not only allow us to detect its strucuring presence but also sign myth as the bearer of ideology and hence at its po ints of tension myth is ruptures by the contradiction that the ideology seeks to smooth over This is to  then that Robinson Crusoe work in these textua specific and sometime-
s  contra dictory or am bivalent ways to embody and prom-ote a certain ideo logy and cons-onant with this to provide a mythical configu ration wh erein such as the structure of the self and other both geographill and psycholog
can be thought.
Cannibaism is a recurrng triple throughout Robinson Crusoe  Crusoe  highl repeti -tious ‘fear of being eaten’ is a mytheme supporting the larger mythic structured Cannibalism defined the white man by negation but it also signal as a pole of the ‘outer limit’ of the man construcng a scale begning with civilised Englishumen aa or  descening through the buffer zone of the Spaniard since they speak the “savage lang-
uage”  through savage through cannibal In this construcion is that which has yet to receive in - corporate the rationale of the nineteenth century’s theories of evolution found in such canoni-
cal wors as Conrad’s Heart of Dark ml ness  there is contaed a common term to be fine in their lives  the man which is potentially the destrucion of the whole representaional system Hulme explains thu “They canniba are not regardd as inh uman because if they were aanimalls their behaviovur would be naturally and could not be not cause the outrage and fear that annibalismas always provoked
*** Generalised Conclusion  *** :-
My discussion of Robinson Crusoe has read against the grain of the book's surfface realism or has suggest that a mythic discourse is  true structur force ‘working through’ the both senses or f the hrase narrative and formal repetition the myth is all the more powerful for its
historically locations prior to economically and literary hey-
day of coloniaism in the 19chentury in in  its con contradddictions and repetition's thought we find that in a sense's  Crusoe is not ‘about’ the colonized at all Hugh Riddley claims that
“the Crusoe storierevealed how little interest lay in the newn of the world to be disovered”  and how
“the strange advent -urelead.. .back to Europe and to the European self” . Any reading of
Crusoe thus bec oms relentless about the bokk's ‘reading back’ to the Europe h is alway already its birth place about the text as part of the “ideologyll of a new' and vast ed hist orical process” Watt
Rise's   dive rgence or conve rgence or  the great preoccupaons of Enlightenment utility and the practically natural law's the State of Nature aod the ‘recent inveb ntion’ of ‘human’ in its many forms's
Robinson's Crusoe ‘ mythical represe ntations of the Other -bifurcate into contr adictor -
y doubles noble savage WS cannibalism savage geography vs. Edenic dominiontion and represe -ntations of the primal encoun -
ter as “** idealised tribute***” vs. “f***ierce hostility”*** under the weighted an expa nsive capitalists ideology which cannot ye-
  t represent those dangerous complexities which consequen escape it yet inevitably return in the text in or  Neither but can show to
For  the ideology nor mythical creature disc ourse that's is it's 'vehicle openly admit that the Other always pro duces the Self despit-
e it's narrative' which develops due -to a search for self a them which prod uces an inf on inite number's of narative's – how many book including The Life and Str-
ange Surprizing Adve oes ntures of Robinson Crusoe  beg in with “I” Myth utopia  projection exist because of the gap be tween represen-
tation and the really and more specifica
n the yearly eiightenth chentury the geographically or metaphys-
ically gap between Europe and its emerging colonies  as Other come to be economics and ideol ogical indis -pensab

Thursday, 9 November 2017

Yugpurush

Yugpurush- Mahatma ka mahatma
August 4,2017
Today we was going to see the live play Mahatma ka Mahatma at Yashwant rai Natya Gruh, Bhavnagar.
Yugpurush is the play about the nation father Mahatma Gandhi's Life. This play is talk about where Gandhi inspired to doing SatyaGrah. We know what is importance of guru (teacher) in our life.

Guru is our deity. If guru wants, he/she will change our life. Guru is our destiny. We can see that Gandhi also a guru Jain philosopher Shrimad Rajchandraji. And he changed Gandhiji's life.
The Father of the Indian Nation, Mahatma Gandhi is synonymous with ahimsa and satyagraha. One wonders who the Mahatma's inspiration was. Gandhiji placed Shrimad Rajchandraji as foremost among those he considered to be his guides. Shrimadji's direct interaction with Gandhiji and His letters, both played a pivotal role in shaping Gandhiji's character and kindled in him the novel idea of using ahimsa to attain independence.
The Yugpurush is a heart-touching portrayal of this special bond between Shrimadji and Gandhiji that catapulted him from 'Mohandas' to 'Mahatma'. What began as friendship, progressed to Gandhiji's proclamation of Shrimadji as his spiritual mentor.

Post Truth

We know the definition of Post Truth very well.
According to Oxford Dictionary that
"Relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.
‘in this era of post-truth politics, it's easy to cherry-pick data and come to whatever conclusion you desire'."
It means  the truth has broken by media and another social media like facebook, twitter,whats app,Instagram etc, that the truth has saw as very Pepperded, and the conclusion has desired by whatever they want. Nd some of critic has believed that this era also a 'Post Truth Political Era'.
I would like to give some political examples like a 'Achhe din'.
We know Modiji will have been completed his 5 year as a PM. And we also know that whatever he done and doing and will be do. And we also know he has done work, which is impossible to another government. We can see that our social media network has propagated that Making a image, and also know the 'Vikas'. They make a jokes, commentary to fight with each other. Like a Congress and Bhajapa, Aam aadmi party and another parties.
I would like tell that one news conference I must that is name 'Aapki adalat' which is organised by Rajat Sharma. I seen this conference, Rajat Sharma has given some example Congress party and Bhajapa's party. Here we can see that nowadays Bhajapa Government has ruler so that Rajat Sharma and another News reporter has spoken with Bhajapa. Whenever government will change, they change.
I would like to share here Rajat sharma's These conference link.
I would like to give some more example about post truth. We are habitually watching T.V serial and  film. Here we can see that most of the directer has started old concept story like 'Mahabharat', 'Gita' and other story. Here we can see that the director has changed and make a new story & serial and they conclude as they wants.

S . T . Coleridge

Difference between prose & poem.
There are some common things between poem and prose. say for i.e, Language first of all, then pleasure, delight, catharsis and other feelings like that. All the things which can be narrated in poem, it also can be expressed well in prose writing.
Bht how and where it differs is thus -
In comparison with poem, prose have limited addition of meanings whereas poem can be meant in thousands of ways. It is the charm of poetry. There might be less words than prose but it can be interpreted in so many ways.
Now if we glimpse over on Coleridge's statement,then we can say that why prose has elements of truth & poem has pleasure.because as we see above that prose has simple structure containing particular subject matter & that only has aimed to be strict to the truth,while poem has sentimental & emotional journey of poet with full expressions & decorations that should have the aim of delight or please to others only.
2.Difference between poetry and poems:
poem;
A poem is the arrangements of words that contain meaning and musical elements. It is a piece of writing that expresses the writer’s thought and feelings in order to set a mood; it can be happy or sad simple or complex. In just a few words, a poem can say a lot, it can be happy or sad , simple or complex. A poem can either be rhyming or non-rhyming. It uses symbols and has lines and stanzas that have sentences, fragments of sentences or both. It uses metaphor and alliteration, especially in poems for children.
Both poetry and prose are generally creative in nature and are used to express emotion or to tell a story. Although poetry is more structured in terms of the format in which it is written, prose is generally more rigid in terms of grammatical correctness. Prose is typically comprised of complete sentences which convey specific thoughts or feelings. Poetry is often more abstract or vague with words being written as they come and less attention being given to proper grammatical rules.

Hamlet

William Shakespeare was an English poet and playwright who is considered one of the greatest writers to ever use the English language. He is also the most famous playwright in the world, with his plays being translated in over 50 languages and performed across the globe for audiences of all ages. His works span tragedy, comedy, and historical works, both in poetry and prose. And although the man is the most-recognized playwright in the world, very little of his life is actually known. No known autobiographical letters or diaries have survived to modern day, and with no surviving descendants, Shakespeare is a figure both of magnificent genius and mystery. This has led to many interpretations of his life and works, creating a legend out of the commoner from Stratford-upon-Avon who rose to prominence and in the process wrote many of the seminal works that provide the foundation for the current English language. His notable work is
“Hamlet”
“The Taming of the Shrew”
“Henry IV, Part 1”
“The Merry Wives of Windsor”
“A Midsummer Night’s Dream”
“Richard III”
First Folio
“Macbeth”
“King John”
“The Merchant of Venice”etc.
Hamlet is the world famous revenge play. Most of film industries try to making film plot of a Hamlet. Kenneth Branagh is a director, who tried to make film as well as hamlet its full based on William Shakespeare's Hamlet.
The movie is faithful in terms of the soliloquy and the dialogues spoken by the characters in the play. The main incidents like the madness of Ophelia, grave digging scene etc are very well shown in the film as similar to the way it is described in the original play, But there are many things in the movie which is different from the original play in terms of costumes, customs. Even in the film hamlet is portrayed as too old than the real Prince Hamlet in the play who is very young. there are many changes made in this film. The presence of ghost is shown by the movement of the sword of the statue whereas in the play the text is unable to show it dramatic movement.Even the falling of the statue at the end is also indicates a big change. So after watching the film my perception about the play, character and the situation is totally changed.
In the film the players came to enact on stage as per the instructions and some dialogues given by Hamlet.When they are performing the incident which relates to the life of Claudius, Gertrude and King Hamlet, both the husband and wife that is Claudius and Gertrude became fearful and Claudius leaves that place immediately.
Yes, I feel catharsis in the film when Ophelia gone mad. and the scene of Grave yard, hamlet saw Yoric's skull.
Yes the screening of the movie helps me a lot in better understanding of the play. because there were many character i understood to his relationship to another like Fortinbras, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern.

Hamlet

William Shakespeare was an English poet and playwright who is considered one of the greatest writers to ever use the English language. He is also the most famous playwright in the world, with his plays being translated in over 50 languages and performed across the globe for audiences of all ages. His works span tragedy, comedy, and historical works, both in poetry and prose. And although the man is the most-recognized playwright in the world, very little of his life is actually known. No known autobiographical letters or diaries have survived to modern day, and with no surviving descendants, Shakespeare is a figure both of magnificent genius and mystery. This has led to many interpretations of his life and works, creating a legend out of the commoner from Stratford-upon-Avon who rose to prominence and in the process wrote many of the seminal works that provide the foundation for the current English language. His notable work is
“Hamlet”
“The Taming of the Shrew”
“Henry IV, Part 1”
“The Merry Wives of Windsor”
“A Midsummer Night’s Dream”
“Richard III”
First Folio
“Macbeth”
“King John”
“The Merchant of Venice”etc.
Hamlet is the world famous revenge play. Most of film industries try to making film plot of a Hamlet. Kenneth Branagh is a director, who tried to make film as well as hamlet its full based on William Shakespeare's Hamlet.
The movie is faithful in terms of the soliloquy and the dialogues spoken by the characters in the play. The main incidents like the madness of Ophelia, grave digging scene etc are very well shown in the film as similar to the way it is described in the original play, But there are many things in the movie which is different from the original play in terms of costumes, customs. Even in the film hamlet is portrayed as too old than the real Prince Hamlet in the play who is very young. there are many changes made in this film. The presence of ghost is shown by the movement of the sword of the statue whereas in the play the text is unable to show it dramatic movement.Even the falling of the statue at the end is also indicates a big change. So after watching the film my perception about the play, character and the situation is totally changed.
In the film the players came to enact on stage as per the instructions and some dialogues given by Hamlet.When they are performing the incident which relates to the life of Claudius, Gertrude and King Hamlet, both the husband and wife that is Claudius and Gertrude became fearful and Claudius leaves that place immediately.
Yes, I feel catharsis in the film when Ophelia gone mad. and the scene of Grave yard, hamlet saw Yoric's skull.
Yes the screening of the movie helps me a lot in better understanding of the play. because there were many character i understood to his relationship to another like Fortinbras, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern.

Paheredar piya ki

I am support this Serial.
Pehredaar Piya Ki” serial is created by Shashi. Peheredaar piya ki’ Title suggest that pehredaar means protector and we can also found in this serial that Diya marries to Ratan for the sack of his protection The serial Pehredaar Piya Ki on Sony TV shows a 10 year boy married to a woman. who is much older to him.
This show is more controversial in the society because of its story. Storyline of this serial is that the 19 year young girl marry with 9 year little boy after his parents death for protect him towards his own evil family member. And also in this serial child marriage happened but they are not promoting it. society doesn't accept this kind of Marriage but media show this kinds of things and Many people request to ban this serial because of theme of child marriage but it is not first time came these kind of serial but many time came to in show for example " Gulal" , " Balika Vadhu".
So we can't say that it is a good serial or bad because its our entertainment. The Serial and Movies are making for our enjoyment. Of course it should be moral and effective. But some stories like 'Paheredar Piya ki', 'Balika vadhu', 'Kumkum Bhagya' etc making for entertainment and also a Ridiculous custom of Social, our culture. If the director has seen this type of scene in his/her serial, they indicate that this type of man and woman, how to face his/her situation. We can not tumble to it misguide us.

2.1

  2.1 it's not only words wps office from Goswami Mahirpari